
GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU vs GeForce GTX 780 Ti

GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU
Popular choices:

GeForce GTX 780 Ti
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU is positioned at rank #40 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Great cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU is significantly newer (2022 vs 2013). The GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce GTX 780 Ti lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.2% higher G3D Mark score and 33.3% more VRAM (4 GB vs 3 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce GTX 780 Ti.
| Insight | GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU | GeForce GTX 780 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.2%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.2%) |
| Longevity | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ampere (2020−2025) / 8nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Kepler (2012−2018)) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (4 GB) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | Standard Size (267mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU and GeForce GTX 780 Ti

GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU
The GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 27 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1545 MHz to 1740 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 90W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 16 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 9,489 points. Launch price was $199.

GeForce GTX 780 Ti
The GeForce GTX 780 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 7 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 875 MHz to 928 MHz. It has 2880 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 9,469 points. Launch price was $699.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU scores 9,489 and the GeForce GTX 780 Ti reaches 9,469 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU is built on Ampere while the GeForce GTX 780 Ti uses Kepler, both on 8 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU) vs 2,880 (GeForce GTX 780 Ti). Raw compute: 7.127 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU) vs 5.345 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 780 Ti). Boost clocks: 1740 MHz vs 928 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU | GeForce GTX 780 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 9,489 | 9,469 |
| Architecture | Ampere | Kepler |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 2048 | 2880+41% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 7.127 TFLOPS+33% | 5.345 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1740 MHz+88% | 928 MHz |
| ROPs | 32 | 48+50% |
| TMUs | 64 | 240+275% |
| L1 Cache | 2 MB+770% | 0.23 MB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+33% | 1.5 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The GeForce GTX 780 Ti relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU | GeForce GTX 780 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2.0 | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 / AFMF (Compatible) | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 780 Ti has 3 GB. The GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU offers 33.3% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 192 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU) vs 336 GB/s (GeForce GTX 780 Ti) — a 75% advantage for the GeForce GTX 780 Ti. Bus width: 128-bit vs 384-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU) vs 1.5 MB (GeForce GTX 780 Ti) — the GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU | GeForce GTX 780 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB+33% | 3 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 192 GB/s | 336 GB/s+75% |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 384-bit+200% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+33% | 1.5 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU) vs 12 (GeForce GTX 780 Ti). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU | GeForce GTX 780 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12 |
| Vulkan | 1.3+8% | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (7th Gen) (GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU) vs NVENC 1st gen (GeForce GTX 780 Ti). Decoder: NVDEC (5th Gen) vs NVDEC 1st gen. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,AV1,VP9 (GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU) vs H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce GTX 780 Ti).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU | GeForce GTX 780 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (7th Gen) | NVENC 1st gen |
| Decoder | NVDEC (5th Gen) | NVDEC 1st gen |
| Codecs | H.264,HEVC,AV1,VP9 | H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU draws 90W versus the GeForce GTX 780 Ti's 250W — a 94.1% difference. The GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU) vs 600W (GeForce GTX 780 Ti). Power connectors: Mobile vs 6-pin + 8-pin. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 83°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU | GeForce GTX 780 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 90W-64% | 250W |
| Recommended PSU | 500W-17% | 600W |
| Power Connector | Mobile | 6-pin + 8-pin |
| Length | — | 267mm |
| Height | — | 111mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | 83°C-2% |
| Perf/Watt | 105.4+178% | 37.9 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2013).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU | GeForce GTX 780 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $699 |
| Avg Price (30d) | — | $42 |
| Codename | GA107 | GK110B |
| Release | January 27 2022 | November 7 2013 |
| Ranking | #276 | #278 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
















