
GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile vs GeForce GTX 1650

GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile
Popular choices:

GeForce GTX 1650
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile is positioned at rank #110 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Balanced cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 20.7% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce GTX 1650.
| Insight | GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile | GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+20.7%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-20.7%) |
| Longevity | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ampere (2020−2025) / 8nm) | Turing (2018−2022) (12nm) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (4 GB) | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce GTX 1650 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $75 versus $150 for the GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile, it costs 50% less. While it maintains lower overall performance, this results in a 65.8% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile | GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+65.8%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($150) | ✅More affordable ($75) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile and GeForce GTX 1650

GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile
The GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 11 2021. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1238 MHz to 1500 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 60W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 9,494 points.

GeForce GTX 1650
The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile scores 9,494 versus the GeForce GTX 1650's 7,869 — the GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile leads by 20.7%. The GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile is built on Ampere while the GeForce GTX 1650 uses Turing, both on 8 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile) vs 896 (GeForce GTX 1650). Boost clocks: 1500 MHz vs 1665 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile | GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 9,494+21% | 7,869 |
| Architecture | Ampere | Turing |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 12 nm |
| Shading Units | 2048+129% | 896 |
| Boost Clock | 1500 MHz | 1665 MHz+11% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The GeForce GTX 1650 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile | GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2.0 | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 / AFMF (Compatible) | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 4 GB of video memory. Memory bandwidth: 192 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile) vs 128 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1650) — a 50% advantage for the GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile | GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 192 GB/s+50% | 128 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile) vs 12 (GeForce GTX 1650). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 3.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile | GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2+2% | 12 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.4+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4+33% | 3 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 8.0 (GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile) vs NVENC 5th gen (Volta) (GeForce GTX 1650). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP11 vs NVDEC 4th gen. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1650).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile | GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 8.0 | NVENC 5th gen (Volta) |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP11 | NVDEC 4th gen |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) | H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile draws 60W versus the GeForce GTX 1650's 75W — a 22.2% difference. The GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile) vs 300W (GeForce GTX 1650). Power connectors: Mobile vs None. Card length: 0mm vs 229mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile | GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 60W-20% | 75W |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 300W-40% |
| Power Connector | Mobile | None |
| Length | 0mm | 229mm |
| Height | 0mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 70°C |
| Perf/Watt | 158.2+51% | 104.9 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 1650 costs 50% less ($75 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 63.3 (GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile) vs 104.9 (GeForce GTX 1650) — the GeForce GTX 1650 offers 65.7% better value. The GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile is the newer GPU (2021 vs 2019).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile | GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $149 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $150 | $75-50% |
| Performance per Dollar | 63.3 | 104.9+66% |
| Codename | GN20-P0 | TU117 |
| Release | May 11 2021 | April 23 2019 |
| Ranking | #286 | #323 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.











