G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB

2024

Why buy it

✅+74.8% higher PassMark G3D performance.
✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 63.6 vs 0 G3D/$ ($169 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 4 GB).
✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.

Quadro M4000M

2015

Why buy it

✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (6,148 vs 10,749).
❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
❌Poor future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 63.6 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $169 MSRP).

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB

2024

Quadro M4000M

2015

Why buy it

✅+74.8% higher PassMark G3D performance.
✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 63.6 vs 0 G3D/$ ($169 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 4 GB).
✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Why buy it

✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (6,148 vs 10,749).
❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
❌Poor future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 63.6 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $169 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is GeForce RTX 3050 6GB better than Quadro M4000M?

Yes. GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is clearly the better overall GPU here. You are also looking at 10,749 vs 6,148 in G3D Mark. On top of that, GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is a 2024 card with DLSS Super Resolution, while Quadro M4000M is a 2015 model from an older generation with no meaningful modern upscaling stack. So this is not really a tight same-tier comparison. It is more a modern card against an older, weaker alternative.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2024 generation instead of 2015, 74.8% more raw performance headroom, more VRAM at 6 GB instead of 4 GB, and better upscaling support with DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack. That leaves it with more room for heavier textures, tougher ray tracing loads, and higher-end 1440p or 4K gaming over the next few years.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is the smarter buy today, but it is not as lopsided as a simple winner label makes it sound. GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is priced in an unclear MSRP range at $169 MSRP versus an unclear MSRP, and you are getting 74.8% higher G3D Mark. It also leads G3D-per-dollar by 100+%. That is why the better overall card still comes out as the smarter buy today, not just the faster one.

Is Quadro M4000M still worth buying for gaming in 2026?

Yes. Quadro M4000M is still a strong modern gaming GPU: it is still comfortable for 1080p and decent for 1440p, though 4K is more situational. It remains a good buy when you can get it meaningfully cheaper than the alternative around an unclear MSRP, even if GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is still the cleaner recommendation on overall value today.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Benchmark Check

Quadro M4000M Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 3050 6GB	Quadro M4000M
1080p
low	109 FPS	102 FPS
medium	92 FPS	88 FPS
high	77 FPS	70 FPS
ultra	45 FPS	42 FPS
1440p
low	95 FPS	89 FPS
medium	81 FPS	77 FPS
high	59 FPS	55 FPS
ultra	34 FPS	32 FPS
4K
low	30 FPS	28 FPS
medium	28 FPS	26 FPS
high	19 FPS	17 FPS
ultra	16 FPS	15 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Open Quadro M4000M

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 3050 6GB	Quadro M4000M
1080p
low	174 FPS	210 FPS
medium	149 FPS	173 FPS
high	118 FPS	128 FPS
ultra	87 FPS	96 FPS
1440p
low	129 FPS	154 FPS
medium	106 FPS	123 FPS
high	83 FPS	96 FPS
ultra	62 FPS	72 FPS
4K
low	74 FPS	84 FPS
medium	62 FPS	67 FPS
high	48 FPS	54 FPS
ultra	34 FPS	40 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Open Quadro M4000M

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	GeForce RTX 3050 6GB	Quadro M4000M
1080p
low	484 FPS	277 FPS
medium	387 FPS	221 FPS
high	322 FPS	184 FPS
ultra	242 FPS	138 FPS
1440p
low	363 FPS	207 FPS
medium	290 FPS	166 FPS
high	242 FPS	138 FPS
ultra	181 FPS	104 FPS
4K
low	242 FPS	138 FPS
medium	193 FPS	111 FPS
high	161 FPS	92 FPS
ultra	121 FPS	69 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Open Quadro M4000M

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	GeForce RTX 3050 6GB	Quadro M4000M
1080p
low	243 FPS	180 FPS
medium	210 FPS	146 FPS
high	171 FPS	131 FPS
ultra	144 FPS	102 FPS
1440p
low	185 FPS	128 FPS
medium	166 FPS	107 FPS
high	131 FPS	97 FPS
ultra	109 FPS	74 FPS
4K
low	104 FPS	75 FPS
medium	87 FPS	58 FPS
high	69 FPS	48 FPS
ultra	55 FPS	35 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Open Quadro M4000M

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3050 6GB and Quadro M4000M

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB

The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 2 2024. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1042 MHz to 1470 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 18 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,749 points. Launch price was $179.

Quadro M4000M

The Quadro M4000M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 18 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 975 MHz to 1013 MHz. It has 1,280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,148 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB scores 10,749 versus the Quadro M4000M's 6,148 — the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB leads by 74.8%. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is built on Ampere while the Quadro M4000M uses Maxwell 2.0, both on 8 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 2,304 (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 1 (Quadro M4000M). Raw compute: 6.774 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 2.496 TFLOPS (Quadro M4000M). Boost clocks: 1470 MHz vs 1013 MHz.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3050 6GB	Quadro M4000M
G3D Mark Score	10,749+75%	6,148
Architecture	Ampere	Maxwell 2.0
Process Node	8 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	2304+80%	1,280
Compute (TFLOPS)	6.774 TFLOPS+171%	2.496 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	1470 MHz+45%	1013 MHz
ROPs	32	64+100%
TMUs	72	80+11%
L1 Cache	2.3 MB+389%	0.47 MB
L2 Cache	2 MB	2 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Quadro M4000M relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3050 6GB	Quadro M4000M
Upscaling Tech	DLSS 2 Super Resolution	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro M4000M has 4 GB. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 96-bit vs 256-bit.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3050 6GB	Quadro M4000M
VRAM Capacity	6 GB+50%	4 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Bus Width	96-bit	256-bit+167%
L2 Cache	2 MB	2 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 12 (12_1) (Quadro M4000M). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3050 6GB	Quadro M4000M
DirectX	12 Ultimate	12 (12_1)
Vulkan	1.3	1.3
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC (5th Gen) (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs NVENC 5 (Quadro M4000M). Decoder: NVDEC (7th Gen) vs NVDEC 1. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode Only) (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs H.264,MPEG-2,MPEG-4,VC-1,DivX (Quadro M4000M).

Feature	GeForce RTX 3050 6GB	Quadro M4000M
Encoder	NVENC (5th Gen)	NVENC 5
Decoder	NVDEC (7th Gen)	NVDEC 1
Codecs	H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode Only)	H.264,MPEG-2,MPEG-4,VC-1,DivX

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB draws 70W versus the Quadro M4000M's 100W — a 35.3% difference. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 350W (Quadro M4000M). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 80°C.