G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB vs Quadro P2000 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB vs Quadro P2000: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB

2024

Why buy it

✅50.2% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Costs $256 less on MSRP ($169 MSRP vs $425 MSRP).
✅Delivers 288.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 63.6 vs 16.4 G3D/$ ($169 MSRP vs $425 MSRP).
✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
✅20% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 5 GB).

Trade-offs

❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.

Quadro P2000

2017

Why buy it

✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3050 6GB across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 5 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
❌2017 hardware with 5 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
❌
151.5% HIGHER MSRP
$425 MSRPvs$169 MSRP

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 50.2% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 54.4% in PassMark G3D (10,749 vs 6,964), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 6 GB vs 5 GB of VRAM, the newer upscaling stack, DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, a 8nm process instead of 16nm, and 18 vs 0 ray-tracing units. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB makes the most sense to buy today. It is $256 cheaper on MSRP at $169 vs $425, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 288.2% (63.6 vs 16.4), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB vs Quadro P2000 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB

The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 2 2024. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1042 MHz to 1470 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 18 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,749 points. Launch price was $179.

Quadro P2000

The Quadro P2000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 6 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1076 MHz to 1480 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,964 points. Launch price was $585.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB scores 10,749 versus the Quadro P2000's 6,964 — the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB leads by 54.4%. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is built on Ampere while the Quadro P2000 uses Pascal, both on 8 nm vs 16 nm. Shader units: 2,304 (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 1,024 (Quadro P2000). Raw compute: 6.774 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 3.031 TFLOPS (Quadro P2000). Boost clocks: 1470 MHz vs 1480 MHz.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3050 6GB	Quadro P2000
G3D Mark Score	10,749+54%	6,964
Architecture	Ampere	Pascal
Process Node	8 nm	16 nm
Shading Units	2304+125%	1024
Compute (TFLOPS)	6.774 TFLOPS+123%	3.031 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	1470 MHz	1480 MHz
ROPs	32	40+25%
TMUs	72+13%	64
L1 Cache	2.3 MB+505%	0.38 MB
L2 Cache	2 MB+60%	1.25 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Quadro P2000 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3050 6GB	Quadro P2000
Upscaling Tech	DLSS 2 Super Resolution	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB has 6 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro P2000 carries 5 GB. GeForce RTX 3050 6GB gives you 20% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 96-bit on the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB and 256-bit on the Quadro P2000. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 1.25 MB (Quadro P2000) — the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3050 6GB	Quadro P2000
VRAM Capacity	6 GB+20%	5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Bus Width	96-bit	256-bit+167%
L2 Cache	2 MB+60%	1.25 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 12.0 (Quadro P2000). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3050 6GB	Quadro P2000
DirectX	12 Ultimate	12.0
Vulkan	1.3+18%	1.1
OpenGL	4.6+2%	4.5
Max Displays	4	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC (5th Gen) (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs NVENC 6.0 (Quadro P2000). Decoder: NVDEC (7th Gen) vs PureVideo HD VP8. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode Only) (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Quadro P2000).

Feature	GeForce RTX 3050 6GB	Quadro P2000
Encoder	NVENC (5th Gen)	NVENC 6.0
Decoder	NVDEC (7th Gen)	PureVideo HD VP8
Codecs	H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode Only)	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB draws 70W versus the Quadro P2000's 75W — a 6.9% difference. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 350W (Quadro P2000). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 160mm vs 201mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3050 6GB	Quadro P2000
TDP	70W-7%	75W
Recommended PSU	300W-14%	350W
Power Connector	None	PCIe-powered
Length	160mm	201mm
Height	—	112mm
Slots	2	1-50%
Temp (Load)	75°C	—
Perf/Watt	153.6+65%	92.9

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB came in at $169, while the Quadro P2000 launched at $425. On MSRP, GeForce RTX 3050 6GB was 60.2% cheaper ($256 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 63.6 (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 16.4 (Quadro P2000) — the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB offers 287.8% better value. The newer card here is GeForce RTX 3050 6GB (2024 vs 2017).

Feature	GeForce RTX 3050 6GB	Quadro P2000
MSRP	$169-60%	$425
Performance per Dollar	63.6+288%	16.4
Codename	GA107	GP106
Release	February 2 2024	February 6 2017
Ranking	#252	#346

Search GeForce RTX 3050 6GB on Amazon

Search Quadro P2000 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.