G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB vs Quadro RTX 3000 with Max-Q Design FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB vs Quadro RTX 3000 with Max-Q Design: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB

2024

Why buy it

✅+32.4% higher PassMark G3D performance.
✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 63.6 vs 0 G3D/$ ($169 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅Better long-term bet: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Quadro RTX 3000 with Max-Q Design across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (72 vs 288), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
❌16.7% higher power demand at 70W vs 60W.

Quadro RTX 3000 with Max-Q Design

2019

Why buy it

✅10.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅300% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (288 vs 72).
✅Draws 60W instead of 70W, a 10W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (8,119 vs 10,749).
❌GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is the safer long-term pick here because the hardware is newer and the feature stack is stronger.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 63.6 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $169 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Quadro RTX 3000 with Max-Q Design is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 10.0% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward GeForce RTX 3050 6GB instead at 10,749 vs 8,119, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 8nm process instead of 12nm and a newer 2024 generation instead of 2019. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. Quadro RTX 3000 with Max-Q Design still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB vs Quadro RTX 3000 with Max-Q Design Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB

The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 2 2024. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1042 MHz to 1470 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 18 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,749 points. Launch price was $179.

Quadro RTX 3000 with Max-Q Design

The Quadro RTX 3000 with Max-Q Design is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 600 MHz to 1215 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 60W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 36 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 8,119 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB scores 10,749 versus the Quadro RTX 3000 with Max-Q Design's 8,119 — the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB leads by 32.4%. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is built on Ampere while the Quadro RTX 3000 with Max-Q Design uses Turing, both on 8 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 2,304 (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 2,304 (Quadro RTX 3000 with Max-Q Design). Raw compute: 6.774 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 5.599 TFLOPS (Quadro RTX 3000 with Max-Q Design). Boost clocks: 1470 MHz vs 1215 MHz. Ray tracing: 18 RT cores (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 36 (Quadro RTX 3000 with Max-Q Design) with 72 Tensor cores vs 288.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3050 6GB	Quadro RTX 3000 with Max-Q Design
G3D Mark Score	10,749+32%	8,119
Architecture	Ampere	Turing
Process Node	8 nm	12 nm
Shading Units	2304	2304
Compute (TFLOPS)	6.774 TFLOPS+21%	5.599 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	1470 MHz+21%	1215 MHz
ROPs	32	64+100%
TMUs	72	144+100%
L1 Cache	2.3 MB	2.3 MB
L2 Cache	2 MB	4 MB+100%
Ray Tracing Cores	18	36+100%
Tensor Cores	72	288+300%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	GeForce RTX 3050 6GB	Quadro RTX 3000 with Max-Q Design
Upscaling Tech	DLSS 2 Super Resolution	DLSS 2 Super Resolution
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	NVIDIA Reflex

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 6 GB of GDDR6. Memory bus width is 96-bit on the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB and 256-bit on the Quadro RTX 3000 with Max-Q Design. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 4 MB (Quadro RTX 3000 with Max-Q Design) — the Quadro RTX 3000 with Max-Q Design has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3050 6GB	Quadro RTX 3000 with Max-Q Design
VRAM Capacity	6 GB	6 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Bus Width	96-bit	256-bit+167%
L2 Cache	2 MB	4 MB+100%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 12 Ultimate (Quadro RTX 3000 with Max-Q Design). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3050 6GB	Quadro RTX 3000 with Max-Q Design
DirectX	12 Ultimate	12 Ultimate
Vulkan	1.3	1.3
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC (5th Gen) (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs NVENC 7th Gen (Quadro RTX 3000 with Max-Q Design). Decoder: NVDEC (7th Gen) vs NVDEC 4th Gen. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode Only) (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs H.265,H.264 (Quadro RTX 3000 with Max-Q Design).

Feature	GeForce RTX 3050 6GB	Quadro RTX 3000 with Max-Q Design
Encoder	NVENC (5th Gen)	NVENC 7th Gen
Decoder	NVDEC (7th Gen)	NVDEC 4th Gen
Codecs	H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode Only)	H.265,H.264

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB draws 70W versus the Quadro RTX 3000 with Max-Q Design's 60W — a 15.4% difference. The Quadro RTX 3000 with Max-Q Design is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 500W (Quadro RTX 3000 with Max-Q Design). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 160mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs Unknown.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3050 6GB	Quadro RTX 3000 with Max-Q Design
TDP	70W	60W-14%
Recommended PSU	300W-40%	500W
Power Connector	None	PCIe-powered
Length	160mm	0mm
Height	—	0mm
Slots	2	0-100%
Temp (Load)	75°C	Unknown-100%
Perf/Watt	153.6+14%	135.3

💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is GeForce RTX 3050 6GB (2024 vs 2019).

Feature	GeForce RTX 3050 6GB	Quadro RTX 3000 with Max-Q Design
MSRP	$169	—
Codename	GA107	TU106
Release	February 2 2024	May 27 2019
Ranking	#252	#313

Search GeForce RTX 3050 6GB on Amazon

Search Quadro RTX 3000 with Max-Q Design on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.