G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB

2024

Why buy it

✅+15.4% higher PassMark G3D performance.
✅Costs $110 less on MSRP ($169 MSRP vs $279 MSRP).
✅Delivers 90.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 63.6 vs 33.4 G3D/$ ($169 MSRP vs $279 MSRP).
✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation (2023).

Radeon RX 590

2018

Why buy it

✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation (2023).
✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 6 GB).

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (9,315 vs 10,749).
❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 8 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
❌
65.1% HIGHER MSRP
$279 MSRPvs$169 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 33.4 vs 63.6 G3D/$ ($279 MSRP vs $169 MSRP).

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB

2024

Radeon RX 590

2018

Why buy it

✅+15.4% higher PassMark G3D performance.
✅Costs $110 less on MSRP ($169 MSRP vs $279 MSRP).
✅Delivers 90.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 63.6 vs 33.4 G3D/$ ($169 MSRP vs $279 MSRP).
✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Why buy it

✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation (2023).
✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 6 GB).

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation (2023).

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (9,315 vs 10,749).
❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 8 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
❌
65.1% HIGHER MSRP
$279 MSRPvs$169 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 33.4 vs 63.6 G3D/$ ($279 MSRP vs $169 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is GeForce RTX 3050 6GB better than Radeon RX 590?

Yes. GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is clearly the better overall GPU here. You are also looking at 10,749 vs 9,315 in G3D Mark. On top of that, GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is a 2024 card with DLSS Super Resolution, while Radeon RX 590 is a 2018 model from an older generation with FSR upscaling + limited Frame Generation. So this is not really a tight same-tier comparison. It is more a modern card against an older, weaker alternative.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2024 generation instead of 2018, 15.4% more raw performance headroom, the stronger feature stack with DLSS Super Resolution instead of FSR upscaling + limited Frame Generation, and a 8nm process instead of 12nm. That broader feature stack should age better as more games lean on modern upscaling and frame-generation support.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is the smarter buy today, but it is not as lopsided as a simple winner label makes it sound. GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is about $110 cheaper on MSRP at $169 MSRP versus $279 MSRP, and you are getting 15.4% higher G3D Mark. It also leads G3D-per-dollar by 90.5%. That is why the better overall card still comes out as the smarter buy today, not just the faster one.

Is Radeon RX 590 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?

Yes. Radeon RX 590 is still a strong modern gaming GPU: it is still comfortable for 1080p and decent for 1440p, though 4K is more situational. It remains a good buy when you can get it meaningfully cheaper than the alternative around $279 MSRP, even if GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is still the cleaner recommendation on overall value today.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Benchmark Check

Radeon RX 590 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 3050 6GB	Radeon RX 590
1080p
low	109 FPS	175 FPS
medium	92 FPS	159 FPS
high	77 FPS	138 FPS
ultra	45 FPS	107 FPS
1440p
low	95 FPS	153 FPS
medium	81 FPS	126 FPS
high	59 FPS	104 FPS
ultra	34 FPS	85 FPS
4K
low	30 FPS	76 FPS
medium	28 FPS	64 FPS
high	19 FPS	49 FPS
ultra	16 FPS	43 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Open Radeon RX 590

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 3050 6GB	Radeon RX 590
1080p
low	174 FPS	170 FPS
medium	149 FPS	145 FPS
high	118 FPS	126 FPS
ultra	87 FPS	98 FPS
1440p
low	129 FPS	96 FPS
medium	106 FPS	75 FPS
high	83 FPS	60 FPS
ultra	62 FPS	49 FPS
4K
low	74 FPS	46 FPS
medium	62 FPS	36 FPS
high	48 FPS	31 FPS
ultra	34 FPS	26 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Open Radeon RX 590

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	GeForce RTX 3050 6GB	Radeon RX 590
1080p
low	484 FPS	419 FPS
medium	387 FPS	335 FPS
high	322 FPS	279 FPS
ultra	242 FPS	210 FPS
1440p
low	363 FPS	314 FPS
medium	290 FPS	252 FPS
high	242 FPS	210 FPS
ultra	181 FPS	157 FPS
4K
low	242 FPS	210 FPS
medium	193 FPS	168 FPS
high	161 FPS	140 FPS
ultra	121 FPS	105 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Open Radeon RX 590

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	GeForce RTX 3050 6GB	Radeon RX 590
1080p
low	243 FPS	419 FPS
medium	210 FPS	335 FPS
high	171 FPS	279 FPS
ultra	144 FPS	210 FPS
1440p
low	185 FPS	314 FPS
medium	166 FPS	252 FPS
high	131 FPS	210 FPS
ultra	109 FPS	157 FPS
4K
low	104 FPS	190 FPS
medium	87 FPS	149 FPS
high	69 FPS	131 FPS
ultra	55 FPS	105 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Open Radeon RX 590

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3050 6GB and Radeon RX 590

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB

The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 2 2024. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1042 MHz to 1470 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 18 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,749 points. Launch price was $179.

Radeon RX 590

The Radeon RX 590 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 15 2018. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1469 MHz to 1545 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 175W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 9,315 points. Launch price was $279.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB scores 10,749 versus the Radeon RX 590's 9,315 — the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB leads by 15.4%. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is built on Ampere while the Radeon RX 590 uses GCN 4.0, both on 8 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 2,304 (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 2,304 (Radeon RX 590). Raw compute: 6.774 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 7.119 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 590). Boost clocks: 1470 MHz vs 1545 MHz.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3050 6GB	Radeon RX 590
G3D Mark Score	10,749+15%	9,315
Architecture	Ampere	GCN 4.0
Process Node	8 nm	12 nm
Shading Units	2304	2304
Compute (TFLOPS)	6.774 TFLOPS	7.119 TFLOPS+5%
Boost Clock	1470 MHz	1545 MHz+5%
ROPs	32	32
TMUs	72	144+100%
L1 Cache	2.3 MB+311%	0.56 MB
L2 Cache	2 MB	2 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 590 is support for FSR Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon RX 590 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3050 6GB	Radeon RX 590
Upscaling Tech	DLSS 2 Super Resolution	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	FSR Frame Generation
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 590 has 8 GB. The Radeon RX 590 offers 33.3% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 168 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 256 GB/s (Radeon RX 590) — a 52.4% advantage for the Radeon RX 590. Bus width: 96-bit vs 256-bit.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3050 6GB	Radeon RX 590
VRAM Capacity	6 GB	8 GB+33%
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	168 GB/s	256 GB/s+52%
Bus Width	96-bit	256-bit+167%
L2 Cache	2 MB	2 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 12.0 (Radeon RX 590). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3050 6GB	Radeon RX 590
DirectX	12 Ultimate	12.0
Vulkan	1.3+8%	1.2
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC (5th Gen) (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs VCE 3.4 (Radeon RX 590). Decoder: NVDEC (7th Gen) vs UVD 6.3. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode Only) (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Radeon RX 590).

Feature	GeForce RTX 3050 6GB	Radeon RX 590
Encoder	NVENC (5th Gen)	VCE 3.4
Decoder	NVDEC (7th Gen)	UVD 6.3
Codecs	H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode Only)	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB draws 70W versus the Radeon RX 590's 175W — a 85.7% difference. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 500W (Radeon RX 590). Power connectors: None vs 8-pin. Card length: 160mm vs 241mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 80°C.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3050 6GB	Radeon RX 590
TDP	70W-60%	175W
Recommended PSU	300W-40%	500W
Power Connector	None	8-pin
Length	160mm	241mm
Height	—	111mm
Slots	2	2
Temp (Load)	75°C-6%	80°C
Perf/Watt	153.6+189%	53.2

💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB launched at $169 MSRP, while the Radeon RX 590 launched at $279. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB costs 39.4% less ($110 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 63.6 (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 33.4 (Radeon RX 590) — the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB offers 90.4% better value. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is the newer GPU (2024 vs 2018).