GeForce RTX 3050 6GB vs Radeon RX Vega 64

NVIDIA

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB

2024Core: 1042 MHzBoost: 1470 MHz
RTX family
·······
VS
AMD

Radeon RX Vega 64

2017Core: 1247 MHzBoost: 1546 MHz
Similar parts
·······

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB vs Radeon RX Vega 64 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB vs Radeon RX Vega 64 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB vs Radeon RX Vega 64: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB

2024

Why buy it

  • Costs $330 less on MSRP ($169 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
  • Delivers 127.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 63.6 vs 28.0 G3D/$ ($169 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
  • Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
  • Better long-term bet: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
  • Draws 70W instead of 295W, a 225W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than Radeon RX Vega 64 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.

Radeon RX Vega 64

2017

Why buy it

  • 44.9% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • 33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 6 GB).

Trade-offs

  • No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
  • 2017 hardware with 8 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
  • 195.3% HIGHER MSRP
    $499 MSRPvs$169 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 28.0 vs 63.6 G3D/$ ($499 MSRP vs $169 MSRP).
  • 321.4% higher power demand at 295W vs 70W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Radeon RX Vega 64 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 44.9% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 29.8% in PassMark G3D (13,949 vs 10,749), so the answer here is pretty clean.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 8nm process instead of 14nm, 18 vs 0 ray-tracing units, and a newer 2024 generation instead of 2017. That gives it the more rounded hardware package for newer games.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB makes the most sense to buy today. It is $330 cheaper on MSRP at $169 vs $499, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 127.5% (63.6 vs 28.0), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. Radeon RX Vega 64 still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB vs Radeon RX Vega 64 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB

The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 2 2024. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1042 MHz to 1470 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 18 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,749 points. Launch price was $179.

AMD

Radeon RX Vega 64

The Radeon RX Vega 64 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 7 2017. It features the GCN 5.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1247 MHz to 1546 MHz. It has 4096 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 295W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,949 points. Launch price was $499.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB scores 10,749 versus the Radeon RX Vega 64's 13,949 — the Radeon RX Vega 64 leads by 29.8%. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is built on Ampere while the Radeon RX Vega 64 uses GCN 5.0, both on 8 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 2,304 (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 4,096 (Radeon RX Vega 64). Raw compute: 6.774 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 12.66 TFLOPS (Radeon RX Vega 64). Boost clocks: 1470 MHz vs 1546 MHz.

FeatureGeForce RTX 3050 6GBRadeon RX Vega 64
G3D Mark Score
10,749
13,949+30%
Architecture
Ampere
GCN 5.0
Process Node
8 nm
14 nm
Shading Units
2304
4096+78%
Compute (TFLOPS)
6.774 TFLOPS
12.66 TFLOPS+87%
Boost Clock
1470 MHz
1546 MHz+5%
ROPs
32
64+100%
TMUs
72
256+256%
L1 Cache
2.3 MB+130%
1 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB
4 MB+100%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon RX Vega 64 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureGeForce RTX 3050 6GBRadeon RX Vega 64
Upscaling Tech
DLSS 2 Super Resolution
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB has 6 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX Vega 64 carries 8 GB. Radeon RX Vega 64 gives you 33.3% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bandwidth: 168 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 484 GB/s (Radeon RX Vega 64) — a 188.1% advantage for the Radeon RX Vega 64. Memory bus width is 96-bit on the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB and 2048-bit on the Radeon RX Vega 64. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 4 MB (Radeon RX Vega 64) — the Radeon RX Vega 64 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce RTX 3050 6GBRadeon RX Vega 64
VRAM Capacity
6 GB
8 GB+33%
Memory Type
GDDR6
HBM2
Memory Bandwidth
168 GB/s
484 GB/s+188%
Bus Width
96-bit
2048-bit+2033%
L2 Cache
2 MB
4 MB+100%
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 12.1 (Radeon RX Vega 64). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

FeatureGeForce RTX 3050 6GBRadeon RX Vega 64
DirectX
12 Ultimate
12.1
Vulkan
1.3+18%
1.1
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
4
4
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC (5th Gen) (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs VCE 4.0 (Radeon RX Vega 64). Decoder: NVDEC (7th Gen) vs UVD 7.0. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode Only) (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon RX Vega 64).

FeatureGeForce RTX 3050 6GBRadeon RX Vega 64
Encoder
NVENC (5th Gen)
VCE 4.0
Decoder
NVDEC (7th Gen)
UVD 7.0
Codecs
H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode Only)
MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB draws 70W versus the Radeon RX Vega 64's 295W — a 123.3% difference. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 750W (Radeon RX Vega 64). Power connectors: None vs 2x 8-pin. Card length: 160mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 85°C.

FeatureGeForce RTX 3050 6GBRadeon RX Vega 64
TDP
70W-76%
295W
Recommended PSU
300W-60%
750W
Power Connector
None
2x 8-pin
Length
160mm
267mm
Height
111mm
Slots
2
2
Temp (Load)
75°C-12%
85°C
Perf/Watt
153.6+225%
47.3
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB came in at $169, while the Radeon RX Vega 64 launched at $499. On MSRP, GeForce RTX 3050 6GB was 66.1% cheaper ($330 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 63.6 (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 28.0 (Radeon RX Vega 64) — the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB offers 127.1% better value. The newer card here is GeForce RTX 3050 6GB (2024 vs 2017).

FeatureGeForce RTX 3050 6GBRadeon RX Vega 64
MSRP
$169-66%
$499
Performance per Dollar
63.6+127%
28.0
Codename
GA107
Vega 10
Release
February 2 2024
August 7 2017
Ranking
#252
#171

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.