
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
Popular choices:

RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
2024Why buy it
- ✅Costs $680 less on MSRP ($169 MSRP vs $849 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 276% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 63.6 vs 16.9 G3D/$ ($169 MSRP vs $849 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅Measures 160mm instead of 167mm, a 7mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell across 29 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (72 vs 136), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell
2025Why buy it
- ✅71.2% more average FPS across 29 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅88.9% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (136 vs 72).
- ✅166.7% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 6 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Blackwell 2.0 on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌402.4% HIGHER MSRP$849 MSRPvs$169 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 16.9 vs 63.6 G3D/$ ($849 MSRP vs $169 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
2024RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell
2025Why buy it
- ✅Costs $680 less on MSRP ($169 MSRP vs $849 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 276% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 63.6 vs 16.9 G3D/$ ($169 MSRP vs $849 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅Measures 160mm instead of 167mm, a 7mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Why buy it
- ✅71.2% more average FPS across 29 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅88.9% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (136 vs 72).
- ✅166.7% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 6 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Blackwell 2.0 on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell across 29 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (72 vs 136), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
Trade-offs
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌402.4% HIGHER MSRP$849 MSRPvs$169 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 16.9 vs 63.6 G3D/$ ($849 MSRP vs $169 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell better than GeForce RTX 3050 6GB?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is GeForce RTX 3050 6GB still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 109 FPS | 181 FPS |
| medium | 92 FPS | 160 FPS |
| high | 77 FPS | 135 FPS |
| ultra | 45 FPS | 99 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 95 FPS | 158 FPS |
| medium | 81 FPS | 133 FPS |
| high | 59 FPS | 99 FPS |
| ultra | 34 FPS | 72 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 30 FPS | 80 FPS |
| medium | 28 FPS | 68 FPS |
| high | 19 FPS | 49 FPS |
| ultra | 16 FPS | 44 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 174 FPS | 294 FPS |
| medium | 149 FPS | 255 FPS |
| high | 118 FPS | 211 FPS |
| ultra | 87 FPS | 170 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 129 FPS | 212 FPS |
| medium | 106 FPS | 181 FPS |
| high | 83 FPS | 152 FPS |
| ultra | 62 FPS | 121 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 74 FPS | 99 FPS |
| medium | 62 FPS | 83 FPS |
| high | 48 FPS | 70 FPS |
| ultra | 34 FPS | 52 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 484 FPS | 646 FPS |
| medium | 387 FPS | 517 FPS |
| high | 322 FPS | 431 FPS |
| ultra | 242 FPS | 323 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 363 FPS | 485 FPS |
| medium | 290 FPS | 388 FPS |
| high | 242 FPS | 323 FPS |
| ultra | 181 FPS | 242 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 242 FPS | 323 FPS |
| medium | 193 FPS | 259 FPS |
| high | 161 FPS | 215 FPS |
| ultra | 121 FPS | 162 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 243 FPS | 290 FPS |
| medium | 210 FPS | 247 FPS |
| high | 171 FPS | 203 FPS |
| ultra | 144 FPS | 177 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 185 FPS | 229 FPS |
| medium | 166 FPS | 198 FPS |
| high | 131 FPS | 165 FPS |
| ultra | 109 FPS | 139 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 104 FPS | 139 FPS |
| medium | 87 FPS | 116 FPS |
| high | 69 FPS | 93 FPS |
| ultra | 55 FPS | 76 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3050 6GB and RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 2 2024. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1042 MHz to 1470 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 18 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,749 points. Launch price was $179.

RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell
RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell
The RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 11 2025. It features the Blackwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 982 MHz to 1957 MHz. It has 4352 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 34 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 14,363 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB scores 10,749 versus the RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell's 14,363 — the RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell leads by 33.6%. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is built on Ampere while the RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell uses Blackwell 2.0, both on 8 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 2,304 (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 4,352 (RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell). Raw compute: 6.774 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 17.03 TFLOPS (RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell). Boost clocks: 1470 MHz vs 1957 MHz. Ray tracing: 18 RT cores (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 34 (RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell) with 72 Tensor cores vs 136.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 10,749 | 14,363+34% |
| Architecture | Ampere | Blackwell 2.0 |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 2304 | 4352+89% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 6.774 TFLOPS | 17.03 TFLOPS+151% |
| Boost Clock | 1470 MHz | 1957 MHz+33% |
| ROPs | 32 | 64+100% |
| TMUs | 72 | 136+89% |
| L1 Cache | 2.3 MB | 4.3 MB+87% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 32 MB+1500% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 18 | 34+89% |
| Tensor Cores | 72 | 136+89% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell supports the newer Upscaling support, whereas the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is capped at DLSS 2 Super Resolution.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell has 16 GB. The RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell offers 166.7% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 96-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 32 MB (RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell) — the RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB | 16 GB+167% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 96-bit | 256-bit+167% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 32 MB+1500% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 12.0 (RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.4+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (5th Gen) (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 9th Gen NVENC (RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell). Decoder: NVDEC (7th Gen) vs 6th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode Only) (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (5th Gen) | 9th Gen NVENC |
| Decoder | NVDEC (7th Gen) | 6th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode Only) | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB draws 70W versus the RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell's 70W — a 0% difference. The RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 500W (RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 160mm vs 167mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 70°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 70W | 70W |
| Recommended PSU | 300W-40% | 500W |
| Power Connector | None | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 160mm | 167mm |
| Height | — | 68mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | 70°C-7% |
| Perf/Watt | 153.6 | 205.2+34% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB launched at $169 MSRP, while the RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell launched at $849. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB costs 80.1% less ($680 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 63.6 (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 16.9 (RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell) — the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB offers 276.3% better value. The RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell is the newer GPU (2025 vs 2024).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $169-80% | $849 |
| Performance per Dollar | 63.6+276% | 16.9 |
| Codename | GA107 | GB206 |
| Release | February 2 2024 | August 11 2025 |
| Ranking | #252 | #165 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












