
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
Popular choices:

GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
2024Why buy it
- ✅Costs $131 less on MSRP ($169 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 33.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 63.6 vs 47.8 G3D/$ ($169 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile across 28 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌40% higher power demand at 70W vs 50W.
GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile
2023Why buy it
- ✅34.1% more average FPS across 28 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 6 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 50W instead of 70W, a 20W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌77.5% HIGHER MSRP$300 MSRPvs$169 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 47.8 vs 63.6 G3D/$ ($300 MSRP vs $169 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
2024GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile
2023Why buy it
- ✅Costs $131 less on MSRP ($169 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 33.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 63.6 vs 47.8 G3D/$ ($169 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
Why buy it
- ✅34.1% more average FPS across 28 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 6 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 50W instead of 70W, a 20W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile across 28 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌40% higher power demand at 70W vs 50W.
Trade-offs
- ❌77.5% HIGHER MSRP$300 MSRPvs$169 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 47.8 vs 63.6 G3D/$ ($300 MSRP vs $169 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile better than GeForce RTX 3050 6GB?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does GeForce RTX 3050 6GB make more sense than GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 109 FPS | 136 FPS |
| medium | 92 FPS | 120 FPS |
| high | 77 FPS | 105 FPS |
| ultra | 45 FPS | 86 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 95 FPS | 120 FPS |
| medium | 81 FPS | 99 FPS |
| high | 59 FPS | 84 FPS |
| ultra | 34 FPS | 72 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 30 FPS | 67 FPS |
| medium | 28 FPS | 59 FPS |
| high | 19 FPS | 42 FPS |
| ultra | 16 FPS | 36 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 174 FPS | 296 FPS |
| medium | 149 FPS | 245 FPS |
| high | 118 FPS | 188 FPS |
| ultra | 87 FPS | 145 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 129 FPS | 198 FPS |
| medium | 106 FPS | 166 FPS |
| high | 83 FPS | 137 FPS |
| ultra | 62 FPS | 109 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 74 FPS | 105 FPS |
| medium | 62 FPS | 87 FPS |
| high | 48 FPS | 75 FPS |
| ultra | 34 FPS | 58 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 484 FPS | 645 FPS |
| medium | 387 FPS | 516 FPS |
| high | 322 FPS | 430 FPS |
| ultra | 242 FPS | 322 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 363 FPS | 442 FPS |
| medium | 290 FPS | 373 FPS |
| high | 242 FPS | 316 FPS |
| ultra | 181 FPS | 242 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 242 FPS | 321 FPS |
| medium | 193 FPS | 258 FPS |
| high | 161 FPS | 200 FPS |
| ultra | 121 FPS | 153 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 284 FPS | 484 FPS |
| medium | 244 FPS | 424 FPS |
| high | 204 FPS | 360 FPS |
| ultra | 160 FPS | 322 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 208 FPS | 402 FPS |
| medium | 188 FPS | 351 FPS |
| high | 153 FPS | 285 FPS |
| ultra | 118 FPS | 242 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 118 FPS | 240 FPS |
| medium | 99 FPS | 203 FPS |
| high | 83 FPS | 185 FPS |
| ultra | 63 FPS | 159 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3050 6GB and GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 2 2024. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1042 MHz to 1470 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 18 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,749 points. Launch price was $179.

GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile
GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile
The GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 3 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1455 MHz to 1755 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 20 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 14,332 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB scores 10,749 versus the GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile's 14,332 — the GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile leads by 33.3%. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is built on Ampere while the GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile uses Ada Lovelace, both on 8 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 2,304 (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 2,560 (GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile). Raw compute: 6.774 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 8.986 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile). Boost clocks: 1470 MHz vs 1755 MHz. Ray tracing: 18 RT cores (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 20 (GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile) with 72 Tensor cores vs 80.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 10,749 | 14,332+33% |
| Architecture | Ampere | Ada Lovelace |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 2304 | 2560+11% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 6.774 TFLOPS | 8.986 TFLOPS+33% |
| Boost Clock | 1470 MHz | 1755 MHz+19% |
| ROPs | 32 | 48+50% |
| TMUs | 72 | 80+11% |
| L1 Cache | 2.3 MB | 2.5 MB+9% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 12 MB+500% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 18 | 20+11% |
| Tensor Cores | 72 | 80+11% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile supports the newer DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution, whereas the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is capped at DLSS 2 Super Resolution.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | Yes (DLSS 3.5) |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile has 8 GB. The GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile offers 33.3% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 168 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 192 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile) — a 14.3% advantage for the GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile. Bus width: 96-bit vs 96-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 12 MB (GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile) — the GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB | 8 GB+33% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 168 GB/s | 192 GB/s+14% |
| Bus Width | 96-bit | 96-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 12 MB+500% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 12.2 (GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (5th Gen) (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 8th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile). Decoder: NVDEC (7th Gen) vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode Only) (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (5th Gen) | 8th Gen NVENC |
| Decoder | NVDEC (7th Gen) | 5th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode Only) | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB draws 70W versus the GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile's 50W — a 33.3% difference. The GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 500W (GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile). Power connectors: None vs Mobile. Card length: 160mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 70W | 50W-29% |
| Recommended PSU | 300W-40% | 500W |
| Power Connector | None | Mobile |
| Length | 160mm | 0mm |
| Height | — | 0mm |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C-6% | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 153.6 | 286.6+87% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB launched at $169 MSRP, while the GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile launched at $300. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB costs 43.7% less ($131 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 63.6 (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 47.8 (GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile) — the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB offers 33.1% better value. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is the newer GPU (2024 vs 2023).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $169-44% | $300 |
| Performance per Dollar | 63.6+33% | 47.8 |
| Codename | GA107 | AD107 |
| Release | February 2 2024 | January 3 2023 |
| Ranking | #252 | #166 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












