G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB vs MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB vs MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB

2024

Why buy it

✅+307.6% higher PassMark G3D performance.
✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 63.6 vs 0 G3D/$ ($169 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
✅200% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 2 GB).
✅Better long-term bet: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.

MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M

2012

Why buy it

✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (2,637 vs 10,749).
❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
❌2012 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 63.6 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $169 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 307.6% in PassMark G3D (10,749 vs 2,637), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 6 GB vs 2 GB of VRAM, the newer upscaling stack, DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, a 8nm process instead of 40nm, and 18 vs 0 ray-tracing units. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup.

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB vs MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB

The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 2 2024. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1042 MHz to 1470 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 18 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,749 points. Launch price was $179.

MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M

The MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 22 2012. It features the Fermi 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 620 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,637 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB scores 10,749 versus the MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M's 2,637 — the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB leads by 307.6%. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is built on Ampere while the MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M uses Fermi 2.0, both on 8 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 2,304 (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 384 (MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M). Raw compute: 6.774 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 0.9523 TFLOPS (MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M).

Feature	GeForce RTX 3050 6GB	MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M
G3D Mark Score	10,749+308%	2,637
Architecture	Ampere	Fermi 2.0
Process Node	8 nm	40 nm
Shading Units	2304+500%	384
Compute (TFLOPS)	6.774 TFLOPS+611%	0.9523 TFLOPS
ROPs	32	32
TMUs	72+13%	64
L1 Cache	2.3 MB+360%	0.5 MB
L2 Cache	2 MB+300%	0.5 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M supports the newer Upscaling support, whereas the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is capped at DLSS 2 Super Resolution.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3050 6GB	MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M
Upscaling Tech	DLSS 2 Super Resolution	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	NVIDIA Reflex

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB has 6 GB of VRAM, while the MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M carries 2 GB. GeForce RTX 3050 6GB gives you 200% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 96-bit on the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB and 64-bit on the MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 0.5 MB (MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M) — the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3050 6GB	MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M
VRAM Capacity	6 GB+200%	2 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR5
Bus Width	96-bit+50%	64-bit
L2 Cache	2 MB+300%	0.5 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 11.0 (MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M). OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.2. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 2.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3050 6GB	MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M
DirectX	12 Ultimate+9%	11.0
OpenGL	4.6+10%	4.2
Max Displays	4+100%	2

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC (5th Gen) (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs PureVideo HD (MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M). Decoder: NVDEC (7th Gen) vs VP4. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode Only) (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs MPEG-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4,VC-1,H.264 (MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M).

Feature	GeForce RTX 3050 6GB	MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M
Encoder	NVENC (5th Gen)	PureVideo HD
Decoder	NVDEC (7th Gen)	VP4
Codecs	H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode Only)	MPEG-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4,VC-1,H.264

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB draws 70W versus the MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M's 100W — a 35.3% difference. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 350W (MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 85°C.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3050 6GB	MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M
TDP	70W-30%	100W
Recommended PSU	300W-14%	350W
Power Connector	None	PCIe-powered
Length	160mm	—
Slots	2	—
Temp (Load)	75°C-12%	85°C
Perf/Watt	153.6+482%	26.4

💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is GeForce RTX 3050 6GB (2024 vs 2012).

Feature	GeForce RTX 3050 6GB	MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M
MSRP	$169	—
Codename	GA107	GF114
Release	February 2 2024	March 22 2012
Ranking	#252	#704

Search GeForce RTX 3050 6GB on Amazon

Search MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.