GeForce RTX 3050 6GB vs Quadro K5200

NVIDIA

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB

2024Core: 1042 MHzBoost: 1470 MHz
VS
NVIDIA

Quadro K5200

2014Core: 667 MHzBoost: 771 MHz

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB vs Quadro K5200 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB vs Quadro K5200 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB vs Quadro K5200: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB

2024

Why buy it

  • 27.9% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Costs $2,081 less on MSRP ($169 MSRP vs $2,250 MSRP).
  • Delivers 2227.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 63.6 vs 2.7 G3D/$ ($169 MSRP vs $2,250 MSRP).
  • Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
  • Better long-term bet: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.

Quadro K5200

2014

Why buy it

  • 33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 6 GB).

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3050 6GB across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
  • 2014 hardware with 8 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
  • 1231.4% HIGHER MSRP
    $2,250 MSRPvs$169 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.7 vs 63.6 G3D/$ ($2,250 MSRP vs $169 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 27.9% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 74.8% in PassMark G3D (10,749 vs 6,149), so the answer here is pretty clean.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: the newer upscaling stack, DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, a 8nm process instead of 28nm, 18 vs 0 ray-tracing units, and a newer 2024 generation instead of 2014. That gives it the more rounded hardware package for newer games.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB makes the most sense to buy today. It is $2,081 cheaper on MSRP at $169 vs $2,250, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 2227.3% (63.6 vs 2.7), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB vs Quadro K5200 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB

The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 2 2024. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1042 MHz to 1470 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 18 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,749 points. Launch price was $179.

NVIDIA

Quadro K5200

The Quadro K5200 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 22 2014. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 667 MHz to 771 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,149 points. Launch price was $1,699.74.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB scores 10,749 versus the Quadro K5200's 6,149 — the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB leads by 74.8%. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is built on Ampere while the Quadro K5200 uses Kepler, both on 8 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 2,304 (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 2,304 (Quadro K5200). Raw compute: 6.774 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 3.553 TFLOPS (Quadro K5200). Boost clocks: 1470 MHz vs 771 MHz.

FeatureGeForce RTX 3050 6GBQuadro K5200
G3D Mark Score
10,749+75%
6,149
Architecture
Ampere
Kepler
Process Node
8 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
2304
2304
Compute (TFLOPS)
6.774 TFLOPS+91%
3.553 TFLOPS
Boost Clock
1470 MHz+91%
771 MHz
ROPs
32
48+50%
TMUs
72
192+167%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Quadro K5200 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureGeForce RTX 3050 6GBQuadro K5200
Upscaling Tech
DLSS 2 Super Resolution
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB has 6 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro K5200 carries 8 GB. Quadro K5200 gives you 33.3% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bandwidth: 168 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 211 GB/s (Quadro K5200) — a 25.6% advantage for the Quadro K5200. Memory bus width is 96-bit on the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB and 256-bit on the Quadro K5200.

FeatureGeForce RTX 3050 6GBQuadro K5200
VRAM Capacity
6 GB
8 GB+33%
Memory Type
GDDR6
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
168 GB/s
211 GB/s+26%
Bus Width
96-bit
256-bit+167%
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB draws 70W versus the Quadro K5200's 150W — a 72.7% difference. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 350W (Quadro K5200). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered.

FeatureGeForce RTX 3050 6GBQuadro K5200
TDP
70W-53%
150W
Recommended PSU
300W-14%
350W
Power Connector
None
PCIe-powered
Length
160mm
Slots
2
Temp (Load)
75°C
Perf/Watt
153.6+275%
41.0
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB came in at $169, while the Quadro K5200 launched at $2250. On MSRP, GeForce RTX 3050 6GB was 92.5% cheaper ($2081 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 63.6 (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 2.7 (Quadro K5200) — the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB offers 2255.6% better value. The newer card here is GeForce RTX 3050 6GB (2024 vs 2014).

FeatureGeForce RTX 3050 6GBQuadro K5200
MSRP
$169-92%
$2250
Performance per Dollar
63.6+2256%
2.7
Codename
GA107
GK110B
Release
February 2 2024
July 22 2014
Ranking
#252
#391

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.