
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB

Quadro K5200
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB vs Quadro K5200 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB vs Quadro K5200 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB vs Quadro K5200: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
2024Why buy it
- ✅27.9% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $2,081 less on MSRP ($169 MSRP vs $2,250 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 2227.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 63.6 vs 2.7 G3D/$ ($169 MSRP vs $2,250 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅Better long-term bet: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
Quadro K5200
2014Why buy it
- ✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 6 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3050 6GB across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌2014 hardware with 8 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
- ❌1231.4% HIGHER MSRP$2,250 MSRPvs$169 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.7 vs 63.6 G3D/$ ($2,250 MSRP vs $169 MSRP).
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB vs Quadro K5200 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 2 2024. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1042 MHz to 1470 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 18 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,749 points. Launch price was $179.

Quadro K5200
The Quadro K5200 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 22 2014. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 667 MHz to 771 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,149 points. Launch price was $1,699.74.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB scores 10,749 versus the Quadro K5200's 6,149 — the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB leads by 74.8%. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is built on Ampere while the Quadro K5200 uses Kepler, both on 8 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 2,304 (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 2,304 (Quadro K5200). Raw compute: 6.774 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 3.553 TFLOPS (Quadro K5200). Boost clocks: 1470 MHz vs 771 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Quadro K5200 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 10,749+75% | 6,149 |
| Architecture | Ampere | Kepler |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 2304 | 2304 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 6.774 TFLOPS+91% | 3.553 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1470 MHz+91% | 771 MHz |
| ROPs | 32 | 48+50% |
| TMUs | 72 | 192+167% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Quadro K5200 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Quadro K5200 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB has 6 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro K5200 carries 8 GB. Quadro K5200 gives you 33.3% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bandwidth: 168 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 211 GB/s (Quadro K5200) — a 25.6% advantage for the Quadro K5200. Memory bus width is 96-bit on the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB and 256-bit on the Quadro K5200.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Quadro K5200 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB | 8 GB+33% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 168 GB/s | 211 GB/s+26% |
| Bus Width | 96-bit | 256-bit+167% |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB draws 70W versus the Quadro K5200's 150W — a 72.7% difference. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 350W (Quadro K5200). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Quadro K5200 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 70W-53% | 150W |
| Recommended PSU | 300W-14% | 350W |
| Power Connector | None | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 160mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 153.6+275% | 41.0 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB came in at $169, while the Quadro K5200 launched at $2250. On MSRP, GeForce RTX 3050 6GB was 92.5% cheaper ($2081 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 63.6 (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 2.7 (Quadro K5200) — the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB offers 2255.6% better value. The newer card here is GeForce RTX 3050 6GB (2024 vs 2014).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Quadro K5200 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $169-92% | $2250 |
| Performance per Dollar | 63.6+2256% | 2.7 |
| Codename | GA107 | GK110B |
| Release | February 2 2024 | July 22 2014 |
| Ranking | #252 | #391 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














