G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB

2024

Why buy it

✅34.9% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 63.6 vs 0 G3D/$ ($169 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 4 GB).
✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌75% higher power demand at 70W vs 40W.

Quadro T2000 Max-Q

2019

Why buy it

✅Draws 40W instead of 70W, a 30W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3050 6GB across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 63.6 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $169 MSRP).

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB

2024

Quadro T2000 Max-Q

2019

Why buy it

✅34.9% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 63.6 vs 0 G3D/$ ($169 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 4 GB).
✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Why buy it

✅Draws 40W instead of 70W, a 30W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌75% higher power demand at 70W vs 40W.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3050 6GB across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 63.6 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $169 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is GeForce RTX 3050 6GB better than Quadro T2000 Max-Q?

Yes. GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is clearly the better overall GPU here. GeForce RTX 3050 6GB averages 34.9% more FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. You are also looking at 10,749 vs 6,959 in G3D Mark. On top of that, GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is a 2024 card with DLSS Super Resolution, while Quadro T2000 Max-Q is a 2019 model from an older generation with no meaningful modern upscaling stack. So this is not really a tight same-tier comparison. It is more a modern card against an older, weaker alternative.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2024 generation instead of 2019, 54.5% more raw performance headroom, more VRAM at 6 GB instead of 4 GB, and better upscaling support with DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack. That leaves it with more room for heavier textures, tougher ray tracing loads, and higher-end 1440p or 4K gaming over the next few years.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is the smarter buy today, but it is not as lopsided as a simple winner label makes it sound. GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is priced in an unclear MSRP range at $169 MSRP versus an unclear MSRP, and you are getting 34.9% more estimated average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and 54.5% higher G3D Mark. It also leads G3D-per-dollar by 100+%. That is why the better overall card still comes out as the smarter buy today, not just the faster one.

Is Quadro T2000 Max-Q still worth buying for gaming in 2026?

Yes. Quadro T2000 Max-Q is still a strong modern gaming GPU: it is still comfortable for 1080p and decent for 1440p, though 4K is more situational. It remains a good buy when you can get it meaningfully cheaper than the alternative around an unclear MSRP, even if GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is still the cleaner recommendation on overall value today.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Benchmark Check

Quadro T2000 Max-Q Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 3050 6GB	Quadro T2000 Max-Q
1080p
low	85 FPS	82 FPS
medium	72 FPS	70 FPS
high	60 FPS	59 FPS
ultra	40 FPS	39 FPS
1440p
low	74 FPS	71 FPS
medium	64 FPS	61 FPS
high	47 FPS	46 FPS
ultra	30 FPS	29 FPS
4K
low	27 FPS	26 FPS
medium	25 FPS	24 FPS
high	17 FPS	16 FPS
ultra	15 FPS	14 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Open Quadro T2000 Max-Q

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 3050 6GB	Quadro T2000 Max-Q
1080p
low	174 FPS	173 FPS
medium	149 FPS	148 FPS
high	118 FPS	118 FPS
ultra	87 FPS	89 FPS
1440p
low	129 FPS	125 FPS
medium	106 FPS	103 FPS
high	83 FPS	84 FPS
ultra	62 FPS	65 FPS
4K
low	74 FPS	73 FPS
medium	62 FPS	61 FPS
high	48 FPS	49 FPS
ultra	34 FPS	36 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Open Quadro T2000 Max-Q

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	GeForce RTX 3050 6GB	Quadro T2000 Max-Q
1080p
low	484 FPS	311 FPS
medium	387 FPS	251 FPS
high	322 FPS	204 FPS
ultra	242 FPS	157 FPS
1440p
low	363 FPS	230 FPS
medium	290 FPS	188 FPS
high	242 FPS	157 FPS
ultra	181 FPS	117 FPS
4K
low	242 FPS	144 FPS
medium	193 FPS	125 FPS
high	161 FPS	85 FPS
ultra	121 FPS	54 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Open Quadro T2000 Max-Q

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	GeForce RTX 3050 6GB	Quadro T2000 Max-Q
1080p
low	243 FPS	160 FPS
medium	210 FPS	127 FPS
high	171 FPS	105 FPS
ultra	144 FPS	90 FPS
1440p
low	185 FPS	114 FPS
medium	166 FPS	91 FPS
high	131 FPS	76 FPS
ultra	109 FPS	63 FPS
4K
low	104 FPS	64 FPS
medium	87 FPS	50 FPS
high	69 FPS	39 FPS
ultra	55 FPS	29 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Open Quadro T2000 Max-Q

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3050 6GB and Quadro T2000 Max-Q

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB

The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 2 2024. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1042 MHz to 1470 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 18 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,749 points. Launch price was $179.

Quadro T2000 Max-Q

The Quadro T2000 Max-Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1200 MHz to 1620 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 40W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,959 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB scores 10,749 versus the Quadro T2000 Max-Q's 6,959 — the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB leads by 54.5%. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is built on Ampere while the Quadro T2000 Max-Q uses Turing, both on 8 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 2,304 (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 1,024 (Quadro T2000 Max-Q). Raw compute: 6.774 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 3.318 TFLOPS (Quadro T2000 Max-Q). Boost clocks: 1470 MHz vs 1620 MHz.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3050 6GB	Quadro T2000 Max-Q
G3D Mark Score	10,749+54%	6,959
Architecture	Ampere	Turing
Process Node	8 nm	12 nm
Shading Units	2304+125%	1024
Compute (TFLOPS)	6.774 TFLOPS+104%	3.318 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	1470 MHz	1620 MHz+10%
ROPs	32	32
TMUs	72+13%	64
L1 Cache	2.3 MB+130%	1 MB
L2 Cache	2 MB+100%	1 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Quadro T2000 Max-Q relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3050 6GB	Quadro T2000 Max-Q
Upscaling Tech	DLSS 2 Super Resolution	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro T2000 Max-Q has 4 GB. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 96-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 1 MB (Quadro T2000 Max-Q) — the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3050 6GB	Quadro T2000 Max-Q
VRAM Capacity	6 GB+50%	4 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Bus Width	96-bit	256-bit+167%
L2 Cache	2 MB+100%	1 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 12.1 (Quadro T2000 Max-Q). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3050 6GB	Quadro T2000 Max-Q
DirectX	12 Ultimate	12.1
Vulkan	1.3	1.3
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC (5th Gen) (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs NVENC 7.0 (Quadro T2000 Max-Q). Decoder: NVDEC (7th Gen) vs PureVideo HD VP9. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode Only) (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Quadro T2000 Max-Q).

Feature	GeForce RTX 3050 6GB	Quadro T2000 Max-Q
Encoder	NVENC (5th Gen)	NVENC 7.0
Decoder	NVDEC (7th Gen)	PureVideo HD VP9
Codecs	H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode Only)	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB draws 70W versus the Quadro T2000 Max-Q's 40W — a 54.5% difference. The Quadro T2000 Max-Q is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 350W (Quadro T2000 Max-Q). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 160mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3050 6GB	Quadro T2000 Max-Q
TDP	70W	40W-43%
Recommended PSU	300W-14%	350W
Power Connector	None	PCIe-powered
Length	160mm	0mm
Height	—	0mm
Slots	2	0-100%
Temp (Load)	75°C	—
Perf/Watt	153.6	174.0+13%