
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
Popular choices:

Radeon Pro V520
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
2024Why buy it
- ✅31.5% more average FPS across 46 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $631 less on MSRP ($169 MSRP vs $800 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 536% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 63.6 vs 10.0 G3D/$ ($169 MSRP vs $800 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 4 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
Radeon Pro V520
2020Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3050 6GB across 46 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌373.4% HIGHER MSRP$800 MSRPvs$169 MSRP
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
2024Radeon Pro V520
2020Why buy it
- ✅31.5% more average FPS across 46 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $631 less on MSRP ($169 MSRP vs $800 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 536% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 63.6 vs 10.0 G3D/$ ($169 MSRP vs $800 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 4 GB).
Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3050 6GB across 46 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌373.4% HIGHER MSRP$800 MSRPvs$169 MSRP
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 3050 6GB better than Radeon Pro V520?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon Pro V520 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Radeon Pro V520 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 85 FPS | 91 FPS |
| medium | 72 FPS | 81 FPS |
| high | 60 FPS | 65 FPS |
| ultra | 40 FPS | 44 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 74 FPS | 79 FPS |
| medium | 64 FPS | 68 FPS |
| high | 47 FPS | 51 FPS |
| ultra | 30 FPS | 34 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 27 FPS | 31 FPS |
| medium | 25 FPS | 29 FPS |
| high | 17 FPS | 21 FPS |
| ultra | 15 FPS | 19 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Radeon Pro V520 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 174 FPS | 195 FPS |
| medium | 149 FPS | 153 FPS |
| high | 118 FPS | 106 FPS |
| ultra | 87 FPS | 79 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 129 FPS | 128 FPS |
| medium | 106 FPS | 97 FPS |
| high | 83 FPS | 72 FPS |
| ultra | 62 FPS | 53 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 74 FPS | 69 FPS |
| medium | 62 FPS | 54 FPS |
| high | 48 FPS | 43 FPS |
| ultra | 34 FPS | 31 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Radeon Pro V520 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 484 FPS | 360 FPS |
| medium | 387 FPS | 288 FPS |
| high | 322 FPS | 240 FPS |
| ultra | 242 FPS | 180 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 363 FPS | 270 FPS |
| medium | 290 FPS | 216 FPS |
| high | 242 FPS | 180 FPS |
| ultra | 181 FPS | 135 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 242 FPS | 180 FPS |
| medium | 193 FPS | 144 FPS |
| high | 161 FPS | 120 FPS |
| ultra | 121 FPS | 90 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Radeon Pro V520 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 243 FPS | 143 FPS |
| medium | 210 FPS | 115 FPS |
| high | 171 FPS | 99 FPS |
| ultra | 144 FPS | 84 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 185 FPS | 108 FPS |
| medium | 166 FPS | 88 FPS |
| high | 131 FPS | 76 FPS |
| ultra | 109 FPS | 64 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 104 FPS | 63 FPS |
| medium | 87 FPS | 51 FPS |
| high | 69 FPS | 40 FPS |
| ultra | 55 FPS | 31 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3050 6GB and Radeon Pro V520

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 2 2024. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1042 MHz to 1470 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 18 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,749 points. Launch price was $179.

Radeon Pro V520
Radeon Pro V520
The Radeon Pro V520 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in December 1 2020. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1600 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 8,000 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB scores 10,749 versus the Radeon Pro V520's 8,000 — the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB leads by 34.4%. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is built on Ampere while the Radeon Pro V520 uses RDNA 1.0, both on 8 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 2,304 (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 2,304 (Radeon Pro V520). Raw compute: 6.774 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 7.373 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro V520). Boost clocks: 1470 MHz vs 1600 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Radeon Pro V520 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 10,749+34% | 8,000 |
| Architecture | Ampere | RDNA 1.0 |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 2304 | 2304 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 6.774 TFLOPS | 7.373 TFLOPS+9% |
| Boost Clock | 1470 MHz | 1600 MHz+9% |
| ROPs | 32 | 64+100% |
| TMUs | 72 | 144+100% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 4 MB+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon Pro V520 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Radeon Pro V520 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro V520 has 4 GB. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 96-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 4 MB (Radeon Pro V520) — the Radeon Pro V520 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Radeon Pro V520 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB+50% | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 96-bit | 128-bit+33% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 4 MB+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 12.1 (Radeon Pro V520). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 0.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Radeon Pro V520 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.3+18% | 1.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 0 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (5th Gen) (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs VCN 2.0 (Radeon Pro V520). Decoder: NVDEC (7th Gen) vs VCN 2.0. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode Only) (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs H.264,H.265,VP9 (Radeon Pro V520).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Radeon Pro V520 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (5th Gen) | VCN 2.0 |
| Decoder | NVDEC (7th Gen) | VCN 2.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode Only) | H.264,H.265,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB draws 70W versus the Radeon Pro V520's 225W — a 105.1% difference. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 350W (Radeon Pro V520). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 160mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 85°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Radeon Pro V520 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 70W-69% | 225W |
| Recommended PSU | 300W-14% | 350W |
| Power Connector | None | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 160mm | 267mm |
| Height | — | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C-12% | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 153.6+331% | 35.6 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB launched at $169 MSRP, while the Radeon Pro V520 launched at $800. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB costs 78.9% less ($631 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 63.6 (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 10.0 (Radeon Pro V520) — the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB offers 536% better value. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is the newer GPU (2024 vs 2020).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Radeon Pro V520 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $169-79% | $800 |
| Performance per Dollar | 63.6+536% | 10.0 |
| Codename | GA107 | Navi 12 |
| Release | February 2 2024 | December 1 2020 |
| Ranking | #252 | #218 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












