
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
Popular choices:

Radeon RX 5700M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
2024Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 63.6 vs 0 G3D/$ ($169 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅Draws 70W instead of 180W, a 110W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (10,749 vs 12,669).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation (2023).
Radeon RX 5700M
2020Why buy it
- ✅+17.9% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 6 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 63.6 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $169 MSRP).
- ❌157.1% higher power demand at 180W vs 70W.
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
2024Radeon RX 5700M
2020Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 63.6 vs 0 G3D/$ ($169 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅Draws 70W instead of 180W, a 110W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅+17.9% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 6 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (10,749 vs 12,669).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation (2023).
Trade-offs
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 63.6 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $169 MSRP).
- ❌157.1% higher power demand at 180W vs 70W.
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon RX 5700M better than GeForce RTX 3050 6GB?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does GeForce RTX 3050 6GB make more sense than Radeon RX 5700M?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Radeon RX 5700M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 109 FPS | 195 FPS |
| medium | 92 FPS | 181 FPS |
| high | 77 FPS | 156 FPS |
| ultra | 45 FPS | 121 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 95 FPS | 163 FPS |
| medium | 81 FPS | 136 FPS |
| high | 59 FPS | 115 FPS |
| ultra | 34 FPS | 93 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 30 FPS | 84 FPS |
| medium | 28 FPS | 71 FPS |
| high | 19 FPS | 56 FPS |
| ultra | 16 FPS | 50 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Radeon RX 5700M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 174 FPS | 269 FPS |
| medium | 149 FPS | 224 FPS |
| high | 118 FPS | 158 FPS |
| ultra | 87 FPS | 115 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 129 FPS | 160 FPS |
| medium | 106 FPS | 131 FPS |
| high | 83 FPS | 99 FPS |
| ultra | 62 FPS | 73 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 74 FPS | 86 FPS |
| medium | 62 FPS | 70 FPS |
| high | 48 FPS | 56 FPS |
| ultra | 34 FPS | 40 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Radeon RX 5700M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 484 FPS | 570 FPS |
| medium | 387 FPS | 456 FPS |
| high | 322 FPS | 380 FPS |
| ultra | 242 FPS | 285 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 363 FPS | 428 FPS |
| medium | 290 FPS | 342 FPS |
| high | 242 FPS | 285 FPS |
| ultra | 181 FPS | 214 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 242 FPS | 285 FPS |
| medium | 193 FPS | 228 FPS |
| high | 161 FPS | 190 FPS |
| ultra | 121 FPS | 143 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Radeon RX 5700M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 243 FPS | 432 FPS |
| medium | 210 FPS | 361 FPS |
| high | 171 FPS | 301 FPS |
| ultra | 144 FPS | 259 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 185 FPS | 360 FPS |
| medium | 166 FPS | 303 FPS |
| high | 131 FPS | 239 FPS |
| ultra | 109 FPS | 199 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 104 FPS | 194 FPS |
| medium | 87 FPS | 155 FPS |
| high | 69 FPS | 140 FPS |
| ultra | 55 FPS | 116 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3050 6GB and Radeon RX 5700M

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 2 2024. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1042 MHz to 1470 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 18 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,749 points. Launch price was $179.

Radeon RX 5700M
Radeon RX 5700M
The Radeon RX 5700M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in March 1 2020. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1465 MHz to 1720 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,669 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB scores 10,749 versus the Radeon RX 5700M's 12,669 — the Radeon RX 5700M leads by 17.9%. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is built on Ampere while the Radeon RX 5700M uses RDNA 1.0, both on 8 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 2,304 (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 2,304 (Radeon RX 5700M). Raw compute: 6.774 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 7.926 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 5700M). Boost clocks: 1470 MHz vs 1720 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Radeon RX 5700M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 10,749 | 12,669+18% |
| Architecture | Ampere | RDNA 1.0 |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 2304 | 2304 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 6.774 TFLOPS | 7.926 TFLOPS+17% |
| Boost Clock | 1470 MHz | 1720 MHz+17% |
| ROPs | 32 | 64+100% |
| TMUs | 72 | 144+100% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 8 MB+300% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 5700M is support for FSR Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon RX 5700M relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Radeon RX 5700M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR Frame Generation |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 5700M has 8 GB. The Radeon RX 5700M offers 33.3% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 168 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 384 GB/s (Radeon RX 5700M) — a 128.6% advantage for the Radeon RX 5700M. Bus width: 96-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 8 MB (Radeon RX 5700M) — the Radeon RX 5700M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Radeon RX 5700M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB | 8 GB+33% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 168 GB/s | 384 GB/s+129% |
| Bus Width | 96-bit | 256-bit+167% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 8 MB+300% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 12.1 (Radeon RX 5700M). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Radeon RX 5700M |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.3+8% | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (5th Gen) (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs VCN 2.0 (Radeon RX 5700M). Decoder: NVDEC (7th Gen) vs VCN 2.0. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode Only) (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon RX 5700M).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Radeon RX 5700M |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (5th Gen) | VCN 2.0 |
| Decoder | NVDEC (7th Gen) | VCN 2.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode Only) | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB draws 70W versus the Radeon RX 5700M's 180W — a 88% difference. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 500W (Radeon RX 5700M). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 160mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 85°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Radeon RX 5700M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 70W-61% | 180W |
| Recommended PSU | 300W-40% | 500W |
| Power Connector | None | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 160mm | 0mm |
| Height | — | 0mm |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C-12% | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 153.6+118% | 70.4 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is the newer GPU (2024 vs 2020).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Radeon RX 5700M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $169 | — |
| Codename | GA107 | Navi 10 |
| Release | February 2 2024 | March 1 2020 |
| Ranking | #252 | #751 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












