
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB

RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB vs RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB vs RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB vs RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
2024Why buy it
- ✅Costs $680 less on MSRP ($169 MSRP vs $849 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 276% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 63.6 vs 16.9 G3D/$ ($169 MSRP vs $849 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅Measures 160mm instead of 167mm, a 7mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (72 vs 136), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
- ❌RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell is the safer long-term pick here because the hardware is newer and the feature stack is stronger.
RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell
2025Why buy it
- ✅73.9% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅88.9% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (136 vs 72).
- ✅166.7% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 6 GB).
- ✅Better long-term bet: Blackwell 2.0 on 5nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌402.4% HIGHER MSRP$849 MSRPvs$169 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 16.9 vs 63.6 G3D/$ ($849 MSRP vs $169 MSRP).
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB vs RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 2 2024. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1042 MHz to 1470 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 18 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,749 points. Launch price was $179.

RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell
The RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 11 2025. It features the Blackwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 982 MHz to 1957 MHz. It has 4352 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 34 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 14,363 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB scores 10,749 versus the RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell's 14,363 — the RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell leads by 33.6%. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is built on Ampere while the RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell uses Blackwell 2.0, both on 8 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 2,304 (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 4,352 (RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell). Raw compute: 6.774 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 17.03 TFLOPS (RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell). Boost clocks: 1470 MHz vs 1957 MHz. Ray tracing: 18 RT cores (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 34 (RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell) with 72 Tensor cores vs 136.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 10,749 | 14,363+34% |
| Architecture | Ampere | Blackwell 2.0 |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 2304 | 4352+89% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 6.774 TFLOPS | 17.03 TFLOPS+151% |
| Boost Clock | 1470 MHz | 1957 MHz+33% |
| ROPs | 32 | 64+100% |
| TMUs | 72 | 136+89% |
| L1 Cache | 2.3 MB | 4.3 MB+87% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 32 MB+1500% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 18 | 34+89% |
| Tensor Cores | 72 | 136+89% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell supports the newer Upscaling support, whereas the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is capped at DLSS 2 Super Resolution.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB has 6 GB of VRAM, while the RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell carries 16 GB. RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell gives you 166.7% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 96-bit on the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB and 256-bit on the RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 32 MB (RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell) — the RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB | 16 GB+167% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 96-bit | 256-bit+167% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 32 MB+1500% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 12.0 (RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.4+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (5th Gen) (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 9th Gen NVENC (RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell). Decoder: NVDEC (7th Gen) vs 6th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode Only) (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (5th Gen) | 9th Gen NVENC |
| Decoder | NVDEC (7th Gen) | 6th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode Only) | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB draws 70W versus the RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell's 70W — a 0% difference. The RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 500W (RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 160mm vs 167mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 70°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 70W | 70W |
| Recommended PSU | 300W-40% | 500W |
| Power Connector | None | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 160mm | 167mm |
| Height | — | 68mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | 70°C-7% |
| Perf/Watt | 153.6 | 205.2+34% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB came in at $169, while the RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell launched at $849. On MSRP, GeForce RTX 3050 6GB was 80.1% cheaper ($680 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 63.6 (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 16.9 (RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell) — the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB offers 276.3% better value. The newer card here is RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell (2025 vs 2024).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $169-80% | $849 |
| Performance per Dollar | 63.6+276% | 16.9 |
| Codename | GA107 | GB206 |
| Release | February 2 2024 | August 11 2025 |
| Ranking | #252 | #165 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














