GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile vs Arc B570
GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile
Popular choices:
Arc B570
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile
Performance Per Dollar Arc B570
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.9% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Arc B570.
| Insight | GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile | Arc B570 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.9%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.9%) |
| Longevity | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) / 5nm) | 🏆Elite Architecture (Xe2 (2024) / 5nm) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | Standard Size (249mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile and Arc B570
GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile
The GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 3 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1455 MHz to 1755 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 20 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 14,332 points.
Arc B570
The Arc B570 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in January 16 2025. It features the Xe2 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2500 MHz to 2500 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 18 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 14,060 points. Launch price was $219.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile scores 14,332 and the Arc B570 reaches 14,060 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile is built on Ada Lovelace while the Arc B570 uses Xe2, both on a 5 nm process. Shader units: 2,560 (GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile) vs 2,304 (Arc B570). Raw compute: 8.986 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile) vs 11.52 TFLOPS (Arc B570). Boost clocks: 1755 MHz vs 2500 MHz. Ray tracing: 20 RT cores (GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile) vs 18 (Arc B570) with 80 Tensor cores vs 144.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile | Arc B570 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 14,332+2% | 14,060 |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Xe2 |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 2560+11% | 2304 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 8.986 TFLOPS | 11.52 TFLOPS+28% |
| Boost Clock | 1755 MHz | 2500 MHz+42% |
| ROPs | 48 | 80+67% |
| TMUs | 80 | 144+80% |
| L1 Cache | 2.5 MB | 4.5 MB+80% |
| L2 Cache | 12 MB | 18 MB+50% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 20+11% | 18 |
| Tensor Cores | 80 | 144+80% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile is support for DLSS 3 Frame Gen. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Arc B570 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Arc B570 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile | Arc B570 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 | XeSS |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.0 (Native) | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 8 GB of GDDR6. Memory bandwidth: 192 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile) vs 380 GB/s (Arc B570) — a 97.9% advantage for the Arc B570. Bus width: 96-bit vs 160-bit. L2 Cache: 12 MB (GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile) vs 18 MB (Arc B570) — the Arc B570 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile | Arc B570 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 192 GB/s | 380 GB/s+98% |
| Bus Width | 96-bit | 160-bit+67% |
| L2 Cache | 12 MB | 18 MB+50% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile) vs 12 Ultimate (Arc B570). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile | Arc B570 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2+2% | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 8th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile) vs Intel Xe Media (Arc B570). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs Intel Xe Media. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile) vs AV1,H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP9 (Arc B570).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile | Arc B570 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 8th Gen NVENC | Intel Xe Media |
| Decoder | 5th Gen NVDEC | Intel Xe Media |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 | AV1,H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile draws 50W versus the Arc B570's 150W — a 100% difference. The GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile) vs 600W (Arc B570). Power connectors: Mobile vs 8-pin. Card length: 0mm vs 249mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile | Arc B570 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 50W-67% | 150W |
| Recommended PSU | 500W-17% | 600W |
| Power Connector | Mobile | 8-pin |
| Length | 0mm | 249mm |
| Height | 0mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 75°C-6% |
| Perf/Watt | 286.6+206% | 93.7 |
Value Analysis
The Arc B570 is the newer GPU (2025 vs 2023).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile | Arc B570 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $219 |
| Avg Price (30d) | — | $219 |
| Codename | AD107 | BMG-G21 |
| Release | January 3 2023 | January 16 2025 |
| Ranking | #166 | #169 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile and Arc B570
