GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile vs Radeon RX Vega 64
GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile
Popular choices:
Radeon RX Vega 64
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile is significantly newer (2023 vs 2017). The GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Radeon RX Vega 64 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.7% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon RX Vega 64.
| Insight | GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile | Radeon RX Vega 64 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.7%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.7%) |
| Longevity | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) / 5nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / GCN 5.0 (2017−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | Standard Size (267mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile and Radeon RX Vega 64
GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile
The GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 3 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1455 MHz to 1755 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 20 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 14,332 points.
Radeon RX Vega 64
The Radeon RX Vega 64 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 7 2017. It features the GCN 5.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1247 MHz to 1546 MHz. It has 4096 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 295W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,949 points. Launch price was $499.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile scores 14,332 and the Radeon RX Vega 64 reaches 13,949 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile is built on Ada Lovelace while the Radeon RX Vega 64 uses GCN 5.0, both on 5 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile) vs 4,096 (Radeon RX Vega 64). Raw compute: 8.986 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile) vs 12.66 TFLOPS (Radeon RX Vega 64). Boost clocks: 1755 MHz vs 1546 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile | Radeon RX Vega 64 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 14,332+3% | 13,949 |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | GCN 5.0 |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 2560 | 4096+60% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 8.986 TFLOPS | 12.66 TFLOPS+41% |
| Boost Clock | 1755 MHz+14% | 1546 MHz |
| ROPs | 48 | 64+33% |
| TMUs | 80 | 256+220% |
| L1 Cache | 2.5 MB+150% | 1 MB |
| L2 Cache | 12 MB+200% | 4 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile is support for DLSS 3 Frame Gen. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Radeon RX Vega 64 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon RX Vega 64 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile | Radeon RX Vega 64 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.0 (Native) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 8 GB of video memory. Memory bandwidth: 192 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile) vs 484 GB/s (Radeon RX Vega 64) — a 152.1% advantage for the Radeon RX Vega 64. Bus width: 96-bit vs 2048-bit. L2 Cache: 12 MB (GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile) vs 4 MB (Radeon RX Vega 64) — the GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile | Radeon RX Vega 64 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | HBM2 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 192 GB/s | 484 GB/s+152% |
| Bus Width | 96-bit | 2048-bit+2033% |
| L2 Cache | 12 MB+200% | 4 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile) vs 12.1 (Radeon RX Vega 64). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile | Radeon RX Vega 64 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.3+18% | 1.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 8th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile) vs VCE 4.0 (Radeon RX Vega 64). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs UVD 7.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon RX Vega 64).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile | Radeon RX Vega 64 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 8th Gen NVENC | VCE 4.0 |
| Decoder | 5th Gen NVDEC | UVD 7.0 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile draws 50W versus the Radeon RX Vega 64's 295W — a 142% difference. The GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile) vs 750W (Radeon RX Vega 64). Power connectors: Mobile vs 2x 8-pin. Card length: 0mm vs 267mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 85°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile | Radeon RX Vega 64 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 50W-83% | 295W |
| Recommended PSU | 500W-33% | 750W |
| Power Connector | Mobile | 2x 8-pin |
| Length | 0mm | 267mm |
| Height | 0mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C-6% | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 286.6+506% | 47.3 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2017).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile | Radeon RX Vega 64 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $499 |
| Avg Price (30d) | — | $85 |
| Codename | AD107 | Vega 10 |
| Release | January 3 2023 | August 7 2017 |
| Ranking | #166 | #171 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile and Radeon RX Vega 64
