GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile vs Radeon RX Vega 64

NVIDIA

GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile

2023Core: 1455 MHzBoost: 1755 MHz
RTX family
·····
VS
AMD

Radeon RX Vega 64

2017Core: 1247 MHzBoost: 1546 MHz
Similar parts
·······

GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile vs Radeon RX Vega 64 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile vs Radeon RX Vega 64 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile vs Radeon RX Vega 64: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile

2023

Why buy it

  • Costs $199 less on MSRP ($300 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
  • Delivers 70.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 47.8 vs 28.0 G3D/$ ($300 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
  • Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
  • Better long-term bet: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
  • Draws 50W instead of 295W, a 245W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than Radeon RX Vega 64 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.

Radeon RX Vega 64

2017

Why buy it

  • 5.6% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.

Trade-offs

  • No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
  • 2017 hardware with 8 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
  • 66.3% HIGHER MSRP
    $499 MSRPvs$300 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 28.0 vs 47.8 G3D/$ ($499 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
  • 490% higher power demand at 295W vs 50W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Radeon RX Vega 64 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 5.6% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile instead at 14,332 vs 13,949, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: native frame generation with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023), while Radeon RX Vega 64 has no comparable frame-generation support, a 5nm process instead of 14nm, 20 vs 0 ray-tracing units, and a newer 2023 generation instead of 2017. That gives it the more rounded hardware package for newer games.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile makes the most sense to buy today. It is $199 cheaper on MSRP at $300 vs $499, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 70.9% (47.8 vs 28.0), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. Radeon RX Vega 64 still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile vs Radeon RX Vega 64 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile

The GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 3 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1455 MHz to 1755 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 20 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 14,332 points.

AMD

Radeon RX Vega 64

The Radeon RX Vega 64 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 7 2017. It features the GCN 5.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1247 MHz to 1546 MHz. It has 4096 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 295W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,949 points. Launch price was $499.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile scores 14,332 and the Radeon RX Vega 64 reaches 13,949 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile is built on Ada Lovelace while the Radeon RX Vega 64 uses GCN 5.0, both on 5 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile) vs 4,096 (Radeon RX Vega 64). Raw compute: 8.986 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile) vs 12.66 TFLOPS (Radeon RX Vega 64). Boost clocks: 1755 MHz vs 1546 MHz.

FeatureGeForce RTX 4050 MobileRadeon RX Vega 64
G3D Mark Score
14,332+3%
13,949
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
GCN 5.0
Process Node
5 nm
14 nm
Shading Units
2560
4096+60%
Compute (TFLOPS)
8.986 TFLOPS
12.66 TFLOPS+41%
Boost Clock
1755 MHz+14%
1546 MHz
ROPs
48
64+33%
TMUs
80
256+220%
L1 Cache
2.5 MB+150%
1 MB
L2 Cache
12 MB+200%
4 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The clearest feature edge for the GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. In games that support it, that can smooth out motion and lift perceived FPS. The Radeon RX Vega 64 does not have comparable native support in the same tier.The GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon RX Vega 64 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureGeForce RTX 4050 MobileRadeon RX Vega 64
Upscaling Tech
DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
Yes (DLSS 3.5)
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 8 GB of video memory. Memory bandwidth: 192 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile) vs 484 GB/s (Radeon RX Vega 64) — a 152.1% advantage for the Radeon RX Vega 64. Memory bus width is 96-bit on the GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile and 2048-bit on the Radeon RX Vega 64. L2 Cache: 12 MB (GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile) vs 4 MB (Radeon RX Vega 64) — the GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce RTX 4050 MobileRadeon RX Vega 64
VRAM Capacity
8 GB
8 GB
Memory Type
GDDR6
HBM2
Memory Bandwidth
192 GB/s
484 GB/s+152%
Bus Width
96-bit
2048-bit+2033%
L2 Cache
12 MB+200%
4 MB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile) vs 12.1 (Radeon RX Vega 64). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

FeatureGeForce RTX 4050 MobileRadeon RX Vega 64
DirectX
12.2
12.1
Vulkan
1.3+18%
1.1
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
4
4
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: 8th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile) vs VCE 4.0 (Radeon RX Vega 64). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs UVD 7.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon RX Vega 64).

FeatureGeForce RTX 4050 MobileRadeon RX Vega 64
Encoder
8th Gen NVENC
VCE 4.0
Decoder
5th Gen NVDEC
UVD 7.0
Codecs
MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1
MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile draws 50W versus the Radeon RX Vega 64's 295W — a 142% difference. The GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile) vs 750W (Radeon RX Vega 64). Power connectors: Mobile vs 2x 8-pin. Card length: 0mm vs 267mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 85°C.

FeatureGeForce RTX 4050 MobileRadeon RX Vega 64
TDP
50W-83%
295W
Recommended PSU
500W-33%
750W
Power Connector
Mobile
2x 8-pin
Length
0mm
267mm
Height
0mm
111mm
Slots
0-100%
2
Temp (Load)
80°C-6%
85°C
Perf/Watt
286.6+506%
47.3
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile came in at $300, while the Radeon RX Vega 64 launched at $499. On MSRP, GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile was 39.9% cheaper ($199 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 47.8 (GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile) vs 28.0 (Radeon RX Vega 64) — the GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile offers 70.7% better value. The newer card here is GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile (2023 vs 2017).

FeatureGeForce RTX 4050 MobileRadeon RX Vega 64
MSRP
$300-40%
$499
Performance per Dollar
47.8+71%
28.0
Codename
AD107
Vega 10
Release
January 3 2023
August 7 2017
Ranking
#166
#171

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.