GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER vs GeForce GTX 1650

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER

#35

GeForce GTX 1650 Ti

MSRP: $150|Avg: $77

111%

#36

Radeon RX 6400

MSRP: $159|Avg: $139

111%

#37

GeForce RTX 3070 Ti

MSRP: $599|Avg: $330

111%

#38

Arc A750

MSRP: $289|Avg: $229

110%

#39

Radeon RX 6800

MSRP: $579|Avg: $370

109%

#40

GeForce RTX 3060 8GB

MSRP: $329|Avg: $280

109%

#41

Radeon RX 6750 XT

MSRP: $549|Avg: $320

108%

#42

GeForce RTX 4070 Ti

MSRP: $799|Avg: $590

107%

#43

GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 16GB

MSRP: $429|Avg: $429

106%

#44

GeForce RTX 5070

MSRP: $549|Avg: $550

105%

#45

Radeon RX 7600 XT

MSRP: $329|Avg: $330

105%

#46

GeForce RTX 2050

MSRP: $150|Avg: $150

103%

#47

GeForce RTX 3080

MSRP: $699|Avg: $400

103%

#48

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB

MSRP: $499|Avg: $449

101%

#49

Radeon RX 7900 GRE

MSRP: $549|Avg: $540

101%

#50

GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER

MSRP: $599|Avg: $600

100%

#51

Radeon RX 7800 XT

MSRP: $499|Avg: $490

99%

#52

GeForce RTX 3060 12GB

MSRP: $329|Avg: $340

99%

#53

GeForce RTX 4070

MSRP: $599|Avg: $550

98%

#54

Radeon RX 7650 GRE

MSRP: $279|Avg: $380

97%

#55

GeForce RTX 2060 12GB

MSRP: $470|Avg: $120

97%

#56

Arc A770

MSRP: $349|Avg: $280

95%

#57

Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12GB

MSRP: $289|Avg: $423

95%

#58

Arc A380

MSRP: $149|Avg: $119

93%

#59

Radeon RX 9070

MSRP: $549|Avg: $550

92%

#60

Radeon RX 7900 XT

MSRP: $899|Avg: $630

92%

#61

GeForce RTX 4080

MSRP: $1199|Avg: $800

82%

#62

Arc A310

MSRP: $100|Avg: $100

81%

#63

GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER

MSRP: $799|Avg: $800

80%

#64

Radeon RX 9070 XT

MSRP: $599|Avg: $700

77%

#65

GeForce RTX 5070 Ti

MSRP: $749|Avg: $850

77%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 280.7% higher G3D Mark score and 200% more VRAM (12 GB vs 4 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce GTX 1650.

Insight	GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER	GeForce GTX 1650
Performance	✅Leading raw performance (+280.7%)	❌Lower raw frame rates (-280.7%)
Longevity	🏆Elite Architecture (Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) / 5nm)	Turing (2018−2022) (12nm)
Ecosystem	✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	🎮 High Capacity (12 GB)	❌ Less VRAM capacity
Efficiency	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt	⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

The GeForce GTX 1650 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $75 versus $600 for the GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER, it costs 88% less. While it maintains significantly lower raw performance, this results in a 110.1% higher cost efficiency score.

Insight	GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER	GeForce GTX 1650
Cost Efficiency	❌Lower cost efficiency	✅Better overall value (+110.1%)
Upfront Cost	⚠️Higher upfront cost ($600)	✅More affordable ($75)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER Benchmark Check

GeForce GTX 1650 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

No prediction data available

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

No prediction data available

League of Legends

League of Legends

No prediction data available

Valorant

Valorant

No prediction data available

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER and GeForce GTX 1650

GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER

The GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 8 2024. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1980 MHz to 2475 MHz. It has 7168 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 220W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 56 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 29,958 points. Launch price was $599.

GeForce GTX 1650

The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER scores 29,958 versus the GeForce GTX 1650's 7,869 — the GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER leads by 280.7%. The GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER is built on Ada Lovelace while the GeForce GTX 1650 uses Turing, both on 5 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 7,168 (GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER) vs 896 (GeForce GTX 1650). Raw compute: 35.48 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER) vs 2.984 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650). Boost clocks: 2475 MHz vs 1665 MHz.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER	GeForce GTX 1650
G3D Mark Score	29,958+281%	7,869
Architecture	Ada Lovelace	Turing
Process Node	5 nm	12 nm
Shading Units	7168+700%	896
Compute (TFLOPS)	35.48 TFLOPS+1089%	2.984 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	2475 MHz+49%	1665 MHz
ROPs	80+150%	32
TMUs	224+300%	56
L1 Cache	7 MB+695%	0.88 MB
L2 Cache	48 MB+4700%	1 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER is support for DLSS 3 Frame Gen. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The GeForce GTX 1650 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The GeForce GTX 1650 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER	GeForce GTX 1650
Upscaling Tech	DLSS 3.5	FSR 2.1 (Compatible)
Frame Generation	DLSS 3.0 (Native)	FSR 3 (Compatible)
Ray Reconstruction	Yes (DLSS 3.5)	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER comes with 12 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 1650 has 4 GB. The GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER offers 200% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 504 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER) vs 128 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1650) — a 293.8% advantage for the GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER. Bus width: 192-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 48 MB (GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER) vs 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1650) — the GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER	GeForce GTX 1650
VRAM Capacity	12 GB+200%	4 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6X	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	504 GB/s+294%	128 GB/s
Bus Width	192-bit+50%	128-bit
L2 Cache	48 MB+4700%	1 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER) vs 12 (GeForce GTX 1650). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 3.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER	GeForce GTX 1650
DirectX	12 Ultimate	12
Vulkan	1.3	1.4+8%
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4+33%	3

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 8th gen (GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER) vs NVENC 5th gen (Volta) (GeForce GTX 1650). Decoder: NVDEC 5th gen vs NVDEC 4th gen. Supported codecs: AV1,H.264,H.265/HEVC (GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1650).

Feature	GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER	GeForce GTX 1650
Encoder	NVENC 8th gen	NVENC 5th gen (Volta)
Decoder	NVDEC 5th gen	NVDEC 4th gen
Codecs	AV1,H.264,H.265/HEVC	H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER draws 220W versus the GeForce GTX 1650's 75W — a 98.3% difference. The GeForce GTX 1650 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER) vs 300W (GeForce GTX 1650). Power connectors: 16-pin (12VHPWR) vs None. Card length: 245mm vs 229mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 70°C.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER	GeForce GTX 1650
TDP	220W	75W-66%
Recommended PSU	650W	300W-54%
Power Connector	16-pin (12VHPWR)	None
Length	245mm	229mm
Height	111mm	111mm
Slots	2	2
Temp (Load)	70°C	70°C
Perf/Watt	136.2+30%	104.9

💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER launched at $599 MSRP and currently averages $600, while the GeForce GTX 1650 launched at $149 and now averages $75. The GeForce GTX 1650 costs 87.5% less ($525 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 49.9 (GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER) vs 104.9 (GeForce GTX 1650) — the GeForce GTX 1650 offers 110.2% better value. The GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER is the newer GPU (2024 vs 2019).