G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce RTX 4070 vs GeForce4 MX 460 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce RTX 4070 vs GeForce4 MX 460: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce RTX 4070

2023

Why buy it

✅19124.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Delivers 201006.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.9 vs 0.0 G3D/$ ($599 MSRP vs $179 MSRP).
✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
✅9500% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 128 MB).
✅Better long-term bet: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌25% higher power demand at 200W vs 160W.
❌84.2% longer card at 304mm vs 165mm.

GeForce4 MX 460

2010

Why buy it

✅Costs $420 less on MSRP ($179 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
✅Draws 160W instead of 200W, a 40W reduction.
✅Measures 165mm instead of 304mm, a 139mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4070 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 128 MB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
❌2010 hardware with 128 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.0 vs 44.9 G3D/$ ($179 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GeForce RTX 4070 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 19124.0% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 672875% in PassMark G3D (26,919 vs 4), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce RTX 4070 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 12 GB vs 128 MB of VRAM, the newer feature stack, with DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution (2023) and DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023), while GeForce4 MX 460 is limited to no meaningful modern upscaling stack and no comparable frame-generation support, a 5nm process instead of 40nm, and 46 vs 0 ray-tracing units. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce RTX 4070 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $420 more expensive on MSRP at $599 vs $179, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 201006.1% (44.9 vs 0.0), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

GeForce RTX 4070 vs GeForce4 MX 460 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce RTX 4070

The GeForce RTX 4070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 12 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1920 MHz to 2475 MHz. It has 5888 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 26,919 points. Launch price was $599.

GeForce4 MX 460

The GeForce4 MX 460 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 12 2010. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 675 MHz. It has 336 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4 points. Launch price was $229.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4070 scores 26,919 versus the GeForce4 MX 460's 4 — the GeForce RTX 4070 leads by 672875%. The GeForce RTX 4070 is built on Ada Lovelace while the GeForce4 MX 460 uses Fermi, both on 5 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 5,888 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 336 (GeForce4 MX 460). Raw compute: 29.15 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 0.9072 TFLOPS (GeForce4 MX 460).

Feature	GeForce RTX 4070	GeForce4 MX 460
G3D Mark Score	26,919+672875%	4
Architecture	Ada Lovelace	Fermi
Process Node	5 nm	40 nm
Shading Units	5888+1652%	336
Compute (TFLOPS)	29.15 TFLOPS+3113%	0.9072 TFLOPS
ROPs	64+100%	32
TMUs	184+229%	56
L1 Cache	5.8 MB+1218%	0.44 MB
L2 Cache	36 MB+7100%	0.5 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The clearest feature edge for the GeForce RTX 4070 is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. In games that support it, that can smooth out motion and lift perceived FPS. The GeForce4 MX 460 does not have comparable native support in the same tier.The GeForce4 MX 460 supports the newer Upscaling support, whereas the GeForce RTX 4070 is capped at DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4070	GeForce4 MX 460
Upscaling Tech	DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	Yes (DLSS 3.5)	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	NVIDIA Reflex

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce RTX 4070 has 12 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce4 MX 460 carries 128 MB. GeForce RTX 4070 gives you 9500% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 192-bit on the GeForce RTX 4070 and 64-bit on the GeForce4 MX 460. L2 Cache: 36 MB (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 0.5 MB (GeForce4 MX 460) — the GeForce RTX 4070 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4070	GeForce4 MX 460
VRAM Capacity	12 GB+9500%	0.125 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6X	GDDR5
Bus Width	192-bit+200%	64-bit
L2 Cache	36 MB+7100%	0.5 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 7.0 (GeForce4 MX 460). Vulkan: 1.3 vs None. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 1.3. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 1.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4070	GeForce4 MX 460
DirectX	12.2+74%	7.0
Vulkan	1.3	None
OpenGL	4.6+254%	1.3
Max Displays	4+300%	1

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: 8th Gen NVENC (2x) (GeForce RTX 4070) vs No (GeForce4 MX 460). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs No.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4070	GeForce4 MX 460
Encoder	8th Gen NVENC (2x)	No
Decoder	5th Gen NVDEC	No
Codecs	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce RTX 4070 draws 200W versus the GeForce4 MX 460's 160W — a 22.2% difference. The GeForce4 MX 460 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 350W (GeForce4 MX 460). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 304mm vs 165mm, occupying 3 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 60°C.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4070	GeForce4 MX 460
TDP	200W	160W-20%
Recommended PSU	650W	350W-46%
Power Connector	8-pin	PCIe-powered
Length	304mm	165mm
Height	137mm	100mm
Slots	3	1-67%
Temp (Load)	80°C	60°C-25%
Perf/Watt	134.6	0.0

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce RTX 4070 came in at $599, while the GeForce4 MX 460 launched at $179. On MSRP, GeForce4 MX 460 was 70.1% cheaper ($420 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 44.9 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 0.0 (GeForce4 MX 460) — the GeForce RTX 4070 offers 100+% better value. The newer card here is GeForce RTX 4070 (2023 vs 2010).

Feature	GeForce RTX 4070	GeForce4 MX 460
MSRP	$599	$179-70%
Performance per Dollar	44.9	0.0
Codename	AD104	GF104
Release	April 12 2023	July 12 2010
Ranking	#32	#652

Search GeForce RTX 4070 on Amazon

Search GeForce4 MX 460 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.