GeForce RTX 4070
GRID K520
GeForce RTX 4070 vs GRID K520 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce RTX 4070 vs GRID K520 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
GeForce RTX 4070 vs GRID K520: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce RTX 4070
2023Why buy it
- ✅+665.6% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Costs $3,000 less on MSRP ($599 MSRP vs $3,599 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 4500.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.9 vs 1.0 G3D/$ ($599 MSRP vs $3,599 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅500% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 2 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌13.9% longer card at 304mm vs 267mm.
GRID K520
2013Why buy it
- ✅Measures 267mm instead of 304mm, a 37mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (3,516 vs 26,919).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌2013 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌500.8% HIGHER MSRP$3,599 MSRPvs$599 MSRP
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce RTX 4070 vs GRID K520 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
GeForce RTX 4070
The GeForce RTX 4070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 12 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1920 MHz to 2475 MHz. It has 5888 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 26,919 points. Launch price was $599.
GRID K520
The GRID K520 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 23 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 745 MHz. It has 1536 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,516 points. Launch price was $3,599.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4070 scores 26,919 versus the GRID K520's 3,516 — the GeForce RTX 4070 leads by 665.6%. The GeForce RTX 4070 is built on Ada Lovelace while the GRID K520 uses Kepler, both on 5 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 5,888 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 1,536 (GRID K520). Raw compute: 29.15 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 2.289 TFLOPS ×2 (GRID K520).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | GRID K520 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 26,919+666% | 3,516 |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Kepler |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 5888+283% | 1536 ×2 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 29.15 TFLOPS+1173% | 2.289 TFLOPS ×2 |
| ROPs | 64+100% | 32 ×2 |
| TMUs | 184+44% | 128 ×2 |
| L1 Cache | 5.8 MB+4362% | 0.13 MB |
| L2 Cache | 36 MB+7100% | 0.5 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The clearest feature edge for the GeForce RTX 4070 is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. In games that support it, that can smooth out motion and lift perceived FPS. The GRID K520 does not have comparable native support in the same tier.The GeForce RTX 4070 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The GRID K520 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | GRID K520 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 4070 has 12 GB of VRAM, while the GRID K520 carries 2 GB. GeForce RTX 4070 gives you 500% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 192-bit on the GeForce RTX 4070 and 64-bit on the GRID K520. L2 Cache: 36 MB (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 0.5 MB (GRID K520) — the GeForce RTX 4070 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | GRID K520 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 12 GB+500% | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6X | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 192-bit+200% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 36 MB+7100% | 0.5 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 12 (11_0) (GRID K520). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 0.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | GRID K520 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2+2% | 12 (11_0) |
| Vulkan | 1.3+8% | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 0 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 8th Gen NVENC (2x) (GeForce RTX 4070) vs NVENC 1 (GRID K520). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs NVDEC 1. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GRID K520).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | GRID K520 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 8th Gen NVENC (2x) | NVENC 1 |
| Decoder | 5th Gen NVDEC | NVDEC 1 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 | H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 4070 draws 200W versus the GRID K520's 225W — a 11.8% difference. The GeForce RTX 4070 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 350W (GRID K520). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 304mm vs 267mm, occupying 3 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | GRID K520 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 200W-11% | 225W |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 350W-46% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 304mm | 267mm |
| Height | 137mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 3 | 2-33% |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 75°C-6% |
| Perf/Watt | 134.6+763% | 15.6 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce RTX 4070 came in at $599, while the GRID K520 launched at $3599. On MSRP, GeForce RTX 4070 was 83.4% cheaper ($3000 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 44.9 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 1.0 (GRID K520) — the GeForce RTX 4070 offers 4390% better value. The newer card here is GeForce RTX 4070 (2023 vs 2013).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | GRID K520 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $599-83% | $3599 |
| Performance per Dollar | 44.9+4390% | 1.0 |
| Codename | AD104 | GK104 |
| Release | April 12 2023 | July 23 2013 |
| Ranking | #32 | #540 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce RTX 4070 and GRID K520
