G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce RTX 4070 vs Quadro P4200 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce RTX 4070 vs Quadro P4200: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce RTX 4070

2023

Why buy it

✅83.5% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Costs $601 less on MSRP ($599 MSRP vs $1,200 MSRP).
✅Delivers 419.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.9 vs 8.6 G3D/$ ($599 MSRP vs $1,200 MSRP).
✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 8 GB).

Trade-offs

❌100% higher power demand at 200W vs 100W.
❌189.5% longer card at 304mm vs 105mm.

Quadro P4200

2018

Why buy it

✅Draws 100W instead of 200W, a 100W reduction.
✅Measures 105mm instead of 304mm, a 199mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4070 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
❌Older hardware, 8 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
❌
100.3% HIGHER MSRP
$1,200 MSRPvs$599 MSRP

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GeForce RTX 4070 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 83.5% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 159.4% in PassMark G3D (26,919 vs 10,376), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce RTX 4070 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 12 GB vs 8 GB of VRAM, the newer feature stack, with DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution (2023) and DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023), while Quadro P4200 is limited to no meaningful modern upscaling stack and no comparable frame-generation support, a 5nm process instead of 16nm, and 46 vs 0 ray-tracing units. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce RTX 4070 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $601 cheaper on MSRP at $599 vs $1,200, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 419.7% (44.9 vs 8.6), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

GeForce RTX 4070 vs Quadro P4200 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce RTX 4070

The GeForce RTX 4070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 12 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1920 MHz to 2475 MHz. It has 5888 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 26,919 points. Launch price was $599.

Quadro P4200

The Quadro P4200 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 21 2018. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1227 MHz to 1647 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,376 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4070 scores 26,919 versus the Quadro P4200's 10,376 — the GeForce RTX 4070 leads by 159.4%. The GeForce RTX 4070 is built on Ada Lovelace while the Quadro P4200 uses Pascal, both on 5 nm vs 16 nm. Shader units: 5,888 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 2,304 (Quadro P4200). Raw compute: 29.15 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 7.589 TFLOPS (Quadro P4200). Boost clocks: 2475 MHz vs 1647 MHz.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4070	Quadro P4200
G3D Mark Score	26,919+159%	10,376
Architecture	Ada Lovelace	Pascal
Process Node	5 nm	16 nm
Shading Units	5888+156%	2304
Compute (TFLOPS)	29.15 TFLOPS+284%	7.589 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	2475 MHz+50%	1647 MHz
ROPs	64	64
TMUs	184+28%	144
L1 Cache	5.8 MB+590%	0.84 MB
L2 Cache	36 MB+1700%	2 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The clearest feature edge for the GeForce RTX 4070 is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. In games that support it, that can smooth out motion and lift perceived FPS. The Quadro P4200 does not have comparable native support in the same tier.The GeForce RTX 4070 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Quadro P4200 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4070	Quadro P4200
Upscaling Tech	DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	Yes (DLSS 3.5)	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce RTX 4070 has 12 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro P4200 carries 8 GB. GeForce RTX 4070 gives you 50% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 192-bit on the GeForce RTX 4070 and 256-bit on the Quadro P4200. L2 Cache: 36 MB (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 2 MB (Quadro P4200) — the GeForce RTX 4070 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4070	Quadro P4200
VRAM Capacity	12 GB+50%	8 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6X	GDDR6
Bus Width	192-bit	256-bit+33%
L2 Cache	36 MB+1700%	2 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 12 (Quadro P4200). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4070	Quadro P4200
DirectX	12.2+2%	12
Vulkan	1.3	1.3
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: 8th Gen NVENC (2x) (GeForce RTX 4070) vs NVENC 6th Gen (Quadro P4200). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs NVDEC 3rd Gen. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs H.265,H.264,VP9 (Quadro P4200).

Feature	GeForce RTX 4070	Quadro P4200
Encoder	8th Gen NVENC (2x)	NVENC 6th Gen
Decoder	5th Gen NVDEC	NVDEC 3rd Gen
Codecs	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1	H.265,H.264,VP9

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce RTX 4070 draws 200W versus the Quadro P4200's 100W — a 66.7% difference. The Quadro P4200 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 500W (Quadro P4200). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 304mm vs 105mm, occupying 3 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 80.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4070	Quadro P4200
TDP	200W	100W-50%
Recommended PSU	650W	500W-23%
Power Connector	8-pin	PCIe-powered
Length	304mm	105mm
Height	137mm	82mm
Slots	3	0-100%
Temp (Load)	80°C	80
Perf/Watt	134.6+30%	103.8

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce RTX 4070 came in at $599, while the Quadro P4200 launched at $1200. On MSRP, GeForce RTX 4070 was 50.1% cheaper ($601 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 44.9 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 8.6 (Quadro P4200) — the GeForce RTX 4070 offers 422.1% better value. The newer card here is GeForce RTX 4070 (2023 vs 2018).

Feature	GeForce RTX 4070	Quadro P4200
MSRP	$599-50%	$1200
Performance per Dollar	44.9+422%	8.6
Codename	AD104	GP104
Release	April 12 2023	February 21 2018
Ranking	#32	#266

Search GeForce RTX 4070 on Amazon

Search Quadro P4200 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.