G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce RTX 4070

2023

Why buy it

✅60.7% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.9 vs 0 G3D/$ ($599 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 8 GB).
✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (184 vs 320), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
❌150% higher power demand at 200W vs 80W.

Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design

2019

Why buy it

✅73.9% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (320 vs 184).
✅Draws 80W instead of 200W, a 120W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4070 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4070 is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 44.9 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $599 MSRP).

GeForce RTX 4070

2023

Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design

2019

Why buy it

✅60.7% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.9 vs 0 G3D/$ ($599 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 8 GB).
✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Why buy it

✅73.9% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (320 vs 184).
✅Draws 80W instead of 200W, a 120W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (184 vs 320), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
❌150% higher power demand at 200W vs 80W.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4070 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4070 is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 44.9 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $599 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is GeForce RTX 4070 better than Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design?

Yes. GeForce RTX 4070 is clearly the better overall GPU here. GeForce RTX 4070 averages 60.7% more FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. You are also looking at 26,919 vs 12,173 in G3D Mark. On top of that, GeForce RTX 4070 is a 2023 card with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation, while Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design is a 2019 model from an older generation with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. So this is not really a tight same-tier comparison. It is more a modern card against an older, weaker alternative.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce RTX 4070 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2023 generation instead of 2019, 121.1% more raw performance headroom, more VRAM at 12 GB instead of 8 GB, and 15.0% more ray-tracing hardware. That leaves it with more room for heavier textures, tougher ray tracing loads, and higher-end 1440p or 4K gaming over the next few years.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

GeForce RTX 4070 is the smarter buy today, but it is not as lopsided as a simple winner label makes it sound. GeForce RTX 4070 is priced in an unclear MSRP range at $599 MSRP versus an unclear MSRP, and you are getting 60.7% more estimated average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and 121.1% higher G3D Mark. It also leads G3D-per-dollar by 100+%. That is why the better overall card still comes out as the smarter buy today, not just the faster one.

Is Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design still worth buying for gaming in 2026?

Yes. Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design is still a strong modern gaming GPU: it is very strong for 1080p, good for 1440p, and more limited at 4K. It remains a good buy when you can get it meaningfully cheaper than the alternative around an unclear MSRP, even if GeForce RTX 4070 is still the cleaner recommendation on overall value today.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce RTX 4070 Benchmark Check

Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 4070	Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design
1080p
low	183 FPS	127 FPS
medium	167 FPS	109 FPS
high	151 FPS	91 FPS
ultra	131 FPS	62 FPS
1440p
low	150 FPS	103 FPS
medium	124 FPS	85 FPS
high	110 FPS	65 FPS
ultra	101 FPS	45 FPS
4K
low	92 FPS	45 FPS
medium	78 FPS	39 FPS
high	65 FPS	28 FPS
ultra	58 FPS	23 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4070 Open Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 4070	Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design
1080p
low	544 FPS	174 FPS
medium	454 FPS	139 FPS
high	353 FPS	117 FPS
ultra	299 FPS	100 FPS
1440p
low	351 FPS	134 FPS
medium	288 FPS	105 FPS
high	235 FPS	90 FPS
ultra	197 FPS	74 FPS
4K
low	172 FPS	78 FPS
medium	144 FPS	63 FPS
high	125 FPS	53 FPS
ultra	101 FPS	40 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4070 Open Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	GeForce RTX 4070	Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design
1080p
low	884 FPS	548 FPS
medium	713 FPS	438 FPS
high	643 FPS	365 FPS
ultra	569 FPS	274 FPS
1440p
low	684 FPS	411 FPS
medium	549 FPS	329 FPS
high	483 FPS	274 FPS
ultra	424 FPS	205 FPS
4K
low	467 FPS	274 FPS
medium	373 FPS	219 FPS
high	326 FPS	183 FPS
ultra	277 FPS	137 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4070 Open Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	GeForce RTX 4070	Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design
1080p
low	751 FPS	247 FPS
medium	612 FPS	214 FPS
high	536 FPS	172 FPS
ultra	497 FPS	145 FPS
1440p
low	615 FPS	189 FPS
medium	500 FPS	167 FPS
high	433 FPS	131 FPS
ultra	395 FPS	108 FPS
4K
low	384 FPS	112 FPS
medium	324 FPS	94 FPS
high	301 FPS	76 FPS
ultra	272 FPS	58 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4070 Open Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4070 and Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design

GeForce RTX 4070

The GeForce RTX 4070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 12 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1920 MHz to 2475 MHz. It has 5888 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 26,919 points. Launch price was $599.

Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design

The Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 780 MHz to 1380 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 80W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 40 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,173 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4070 scores 26,919 versus the Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design's 12,173 — the GeForce RTX 4070 leads by 121.1%. The GeForce RTX 4070 is built on Ada Lovelace while the Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design uses Turing, both on 5 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 5,888 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 2,560 (Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design). Raw compute: 29.15 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 7.066 TFLOPS (Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design). Boost clocks: 2475 MHz vs 1380 MHz. Ray tracing: 46 RT cores (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 40 (Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design) with 184 Tensor cores vs 320.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4070	Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design
G3D Mark Score	26,919+121%	12,173
Architecture	Ada Lovelace	Turing
Process Node	5 nm	12 nm
Shading Units	5888+130%	2560
Compute (TFLOPS)	29.15 TFLOPS+313%	7.066 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	2475 MHz+79%	1380 MHz
ROPs	64	64
TMUs	184+15%	160
L1 Cache	5.8 MB+132%	2.5 MB
L2 Cache	36 MB+800%	4 MB
Ray Tracing Cores	46+15%	40
Tensor Cores	184	320+74%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Both cards support modern Frame Generation technology, allowing them to insert intermediate frames to smooth motion and boost perceived FPS in supported games.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4070	Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design
Upscaling Tech	DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution	DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution
Frame Generation	DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation	DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation
Ray Reconstruction	Yes (DLSS 3.5)	Yes (DLSS 3.5)
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	NVIDIA Reflex

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce RTX 4070 comes with 12 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design has 8 GB. The GeForce RTX 4070 offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 192-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 36 MB (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 4 MB (Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design) — the GeForce RTX 4070 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4070	Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design
VRAM Capacity	12 GB+50%	8 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6X	GDDR6
Bus Width	192-bit	256-bit+33%
L2 Cache	36 MB+800%	4 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 12.2 (Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4070	Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design
DirectX	12.2	12.2
Vulkan	1.3	1.3
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: 8th Gen NVENC (2x) (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 7th Gen NVENC (Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design).

Feature	GeForce RTX 4070	Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design
Encoder	8th Gen NVENC (2x)	7th Gen NVENC
Decoder	5th Gen NVDEC	5th Gen NVDEC
Codecs	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce RTX 4070 draws 200W versus the Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design's 80W — a 85.7% difference. The Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 500W (Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 304mm vs 0mm, occupying 3 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 80°C.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4070	Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design
TDP	200W	80W-60%
Recommended PSU	650W	500W-23%
Power Connector	8-pin	PCIe-powered
Length	304mm	0mm
Height	137mm	0mm
Slots	3	0-100%
Temp (Load)	80°C	80°C
Perf/Watt	134.6	152.2+13%