G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce RTX 4070

2023

Why buy it

✅+124.3% higher PassMark G3D performance.
✅Costs $1,401 less on MSRP ($599 MSRP vs $2,000 MSRP).
✅Delivers 649% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.9 vs 6.0 G3D/$ ($599 MSRP vs $2,000 MSRP).
✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 8 GB).

Trade-offs

❌26.6% higher power demand at 200W vs 158W.
❌13.9% longer card at 304mm vs 267mm.

Radeon PRO V710

2024

Why buy it

✅Draws 158W instead of 200W, a 42W reduction.
✅Measures 267mm instead of 304mm, a 37mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (12,000 vs 26,919).
❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4070 is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
❌
233.9% HIGHER MSRP
$2,000 MSRPvs$599 MSRP

GeForce RTX 4070

2023

Radeon PRO V710

2024

Why buy it

✅+124.3% higher PassMark G3D performance.
✅Costs $1,401 less on MSRP ($599 MSRP vs $2,000 MSRP).
✅Delivers 649% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.9 vs 6.0 G3D/$ ($599 MSRP vs $2,000 MSRP).
✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 8 GB).

Why buy it

✅Draws 158W instead of 200W, a 42W reduction.
✅Measures 267mm instead of 304mm, a 37mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

❌26.6% higher power demand at 200W vs 158W.
❌13.9% longer card at 304mm vs 267mm.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (12,000 vs 26,919).
❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4070 is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
❌
233.9% HIGHER MSRP
$2,000 MSRPvs$599 MSRP

Quick Answers

So, is GeForce RTX 4070 better than Radeon PRO V710?

Yes. GeForce RTX 4070 is clearly the better overall GPU here. You are also looking at 26,919 vs 12,000 in G3D Mark. On top of that, GeForce RTX 4070 is a 2023 card with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation, while Radeon PRO V710 is a 2024 model from an older generation with FSR upscaling. So this is not really a tight same-tier comparison. It is more a modern card against an older, weaker alternative.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce RTX 4070 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting 124.3% more raw performance headroom, more VRAM at 12 GB instead of 8 GB, and better frame-generation support with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023) instead of FSR upscaling. That leaves it with more room for heavier textures, tougher ray tracing loads, and higher-end 1440p or 4K gaming over the next few years.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

GeForce RTX 4070 is the smarter buy today, but it is not as lopsided as a simple winner label makes it sound. GeForce RTX 4070 is about $1,401 cheaper on MSRP at $599 MSRP versus $2,000 MSRP, and you are getting 124.3% higher G3D Mark. It also leads G3D-per-dollar by 649%. Radeon PRO V710 is the newer 2024 card, so it still has a real case if you care more about newer architecture and lower power draw (158W vs 200W) than about squeezing out the strongest gaming value today.

When does Radeon PRO V710 make more sense than GeForce RTX 4070?

Yes. Radeon PRO V710 is still an excellent gaming GPU in 2026: it is very strong for 1080p, good for 1440p, and more limited at 4K. It makes more sense if your priority is newer architecture, lower power draw (158W vs 200W), and staying closer to $2,000 MSRP more than squeezing out the extra headroom of GeForce RTX 4070. The trade-off is that GeForce RTX 4070 currently gives you 124.3% higher G3D Mark. It also leads G3D-per-dollar by 649%.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce RTX 4070 Benchmark Check

Radeon PRO V710 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 4070	Radeon PRO V710
1080p
low	183 FPS	215 FPS
medium	167 FPS	196 FPS
high	151 FPS	170 FPS
ultra	131 FPS	130 FPS
1440p
low	150 FPS	180 FPS
medium	124 FPS	146 FPS
high	110 FPS	125 FPS
ultra	101 FPS	102 FPS
4K
low	92 FPS	96 FPS
medium	78 FPS	81 FPS
high	65 FPS	64 FPS
ultra	58 FPS	56 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4070 Open Radeon PRO V710

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 4070	Radeon PRO V710
1080p
low	544 FPS	509 FPS
medium	454 FPS	414 FPS
high	353 FPS	327 FPS
ultra	299 FPS	270 FPS
1440p
low	351 FPS	338 FPS
medium	288 FPS	269 FPS
high	235 FPS	221 FPS
ultra	197 FPS	185 FPS
4K
low	172 FPS	157 FPS
medium	144 FPS	130 FPS
high	125 FPS	108 FPS
ultra	101 FPS	87 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4070 Open Radeon PRO V710

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	GeForce RTX 4070	Radeon PRO V710
1080p
low	884 FPS	540 FPS
medium	713 FPS	432 FPS
high	643 FPS	360 FPS
ultra	569 FPS	270 FPS
1440p
low	684 FPS	405 FPS
medium	549 FPS	324 FPS
high	483 FPS	270 FPS
ultra	424 FPS	202 FPS
4K
low	467 FPS	270 FPS
medium	373 FPS	216 FPS
high	326 FPS	180 FPS
ultra	277 FPS	135 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4070 Open Radeon PRO V710

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	GeForce RTX 4070	Radeon PRO V710
1080p
low	751 FPS	540 FPS
medium	612 FPS	432 FPS
high	536 FPS	360 FPS
ultra	497 FPS	270 FPS
1440p
low	615 FPS	405 FPS
medium	500 FPS	324 FPS
high	433 FPS	270 FPS
ultra	395 FPS	202 FPS
4K
low	384 FPS	270 FPS
medium	324 FPS	216 FPS
high	301 FPS	180 FPS
ultra	272 FPS	135 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4070 Open Radeon PRO V710

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4070 and Radeon PRO V710

GeForce RTX 4070

The GeForce RTX 4070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 12 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1920 MHz to 2475 MHz. It has 5888 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 26,919 points. Launch price was $599.

Radeon PRO V710

The Radeon PRO V710 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 3 2024. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1900 MHz to 2000 MHz. It has 3456 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 158W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 54 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,000 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4070 scores 26,919 versus the Radeon PRO V710's 12,000 — the GeForce RTX 4070 leads by 124.3%. The GeForce RTX 4070 is built on Ada Lovelace while the Radeon PRO V710 uses RDNA 3.0, both on a 5 nm process. Shader units: 5,888 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 3,456 (Radeon PRO V710). Raw compute: 29.15 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 27.65 TFLOPS (Radeon PRO V710). Boost clocks: 2475 MHz vs 2000 MHz. Ray tracing: 46 RT cores (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 54 (Radeon PRO V710) with 184 Tensor cores.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4070	Radeon PRO V710
G3D Mark Score	26,919+124%	12,000
Architecture	Ada Lovelace	RDNA 3.0
Process Node	5 nm	5 nm
Shading Units	5888+70%	3456
Compute (TFLOPS)	29.15 TFLOPS+5%	27.65 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	2475 MHz+24%	2000 MHz
ROPs	64	96+50%
TMUs	184	216+17%
L1 Cache	5.8 MB+673%	0.75 MB
L2 Cache	36 MB+1700%	2 MB
Ray Tracing Cores	46	54+17%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4070 is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Radeon PRO V710 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 4070 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon PRO V710 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4070	Radeon PRO V710
Upscaling Tech	DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	Yes (DLSS 3.5)	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce RTX 4070 comes with 12 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon PRO V710 has 8 GB. The GeForce RTX 4070 offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 192-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 36 MB (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 2 MB (Radeon PRO V710) — the GeForce RTX 4070 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4070	Radeon PRO V710
VRAM Capacity	12 GB+50%	8 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6X	GDDR6
Bus Width	192-bit	256-bit+33%
L2 Cache	36 MB+1700%	2 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 12.2 (Radeon PRO V710). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 0.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4070	Radeon PRO V710
DirectX	12.2	12.2
Vulkan	1.3	1.3
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4	0

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: 8th Gen NVENC (2x) (GeForce RTX 4070) vs VCN 4.0 (Radeon PRO V710). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs VCN 4.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon PRO V710).

Feature	GeForce RTX 4070	Radeon PRO V710
Encoder	8th Gen NVENC (2x)	VCN 4.0
Decoder	5th Gen NVDEC	VCN 4.0
Codecs	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce RTX 4070 draws 200W versus the Radeon PRO V710's 158W — a 23.5% difference. The Radeon PRO V710 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 500W (Radeon PRO V710). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 304mm vs 267mm, occupying 3 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 80°C.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4070	Radeon PRO V710
TDP	200W	158W-21%
Recommended PSU	650W	500W-23%
Power Connector	8-pin	PCIe-powered
Length	304mm	267mm
Height	137mm	111mm
Slots	3	1-67%
Temp (Load)	80°C	80°C
Perf/Watt	134.6+77%	75.9

💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce RTX 4070 launched at $599 MSRP, while the Radeon PRO V710 launched at $2000. The GeForce RTX 4070 costs 70% less ($1401 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 44.9 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 6.0 (Radeon PRO V710) — the GeForce RTX 4070 offers 648.3% better value. The Radeon PRO V710 is the newer GPU (2024 vs 2023).