
GeForce RTX 4070
Popular choices:

Radeon RX 5700M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 4070
2023Why buy it
- ✅+112.5% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.9 vs 0 G3D/$ ($599 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution (2023).
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 8 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
Radeon RX 5700M
2020Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (12,669 vs 26,919).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4070 is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 44.9 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 4070
2023Radeon RX 5700M
2020Why buy it
- ✅+112.5% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.9 vs 0 G3D/$ ($599 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution (2023).
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 8 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (12,669 vs 26,919).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4070 is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 44.9 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 4070 better than Radeon RX 5700M?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon RX 5700M still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4070 | Radeon RX 5700M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 183 FPS | 195 FPS |
| medium | 167 FPS | 181 FPS |
| high | 151 FPS | 156 FPS |
| ultra | 131 FPS | 121 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 150 FPS | 163 FPS |
| medium | 124 FPS | 136 FPS |
| high | 110 FPS | 115 FPS |
| ultra | 101 FPS | 93 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 92 FPS | 84 FPS |
| medium | 78 FPS | 71 FPS |
| high | 65 FPS | 56 FPS |
| ultra | 58 FPS | 50 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4070 | Radeon RX 5700M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 544 FPS | 269 FPS |
| medium | 454 FPS | 224 FPS |
| high | 353 FPS | 158 FPS |
| ultra | 299 FPS | 115 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 351 FPS | 160 FPS |
| medium | 288 FPS | 131 FPS |
| high | 235 FPS | 99 FPS |
| ultra | 197 FPS | 73 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 172 FPS | 86 FPS |
| medium | 144 FPS | 70 FPS |
| high | 125 FPS | 56 FPS |
| ultra | 101 FPS | 40 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4070 | Radeon RX 5700M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 884 FPS | 570 FPS |
| medium | 713 FPS | 456 FPS |
| high | 643 FPS | 380 FPS |
| ultra | 569 FPS | 285 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 684 FPS | 428 FPS |
| medium | 549 FPS | 342 FPS |
| high | 483 FPS | 285 FPS |
| ultra | 424 FPS | 214 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 467 FPS | 285 FPS |
| medium | 373 FPS | 228 FPS |
| high | 326 FPS | 190 FPS |
| ultra | 277 FPS | 143 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4070 | Radeon RX 5700M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 751 FPS | 469 FPS |
| medium | 612 FPS | 394 FPS |
| high | 536 FPS | 324 FPS |
| ultra | 497 FPS | 278 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 615 FPS | 383 FPS |
| medium | 500 FPS | 326 FPS |
| high | 433 FPS | 253 FPS |
| ultra | 395 FPS | 210 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 384 FPS | 207 FPS |
| medium | 324 FPS | 167 FPS |
| high | 301 FPS | 149 FPS |
| ultra | 272 FPS | 123 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4070 and Radeon RX 5700M

GeForce RTX 4070
GeForce RTX 4070
The GeForce RTX 4070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 12 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1920 MHz to 2475 MHz. It has 5888 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 26,919 points. Launch price was $599.

Radeon RX 5700M
Radeon RX 5700M
The Radeon RX 5700M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in March 1 2020. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1465 MHz to 1720 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,669 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4070 scores 26,919 versus the Radeon RX 5700M's 12,669 — the GeForce RTX 4070 leads by 112.5%. The GeForce RTX 4070 is built on Ada Lovelace while the Radeon RX 5700M uses RDNA 1.0, both on 5 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 5,888 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 2,304 (Radeon RX 5700M). Raw compute: 29.15 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 7.926 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 5700M). Boost clocks: 2475 MHz vs 1720 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | Radeon RX 5700M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 26,919+112% | 12,669 |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | RDNA 1.0 |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 5888+156% | 2304 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 29.15 TFLOPS+268% | 7.926 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2475 MHz+44% | 1720 MHz |
| ROPs | 64 | 64 |
| TMUs | 184+28% | 144 |
| L2 Cache | 36 MB+350% | 8 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
Both GPUs support Frame Generation technologies, but they achieve it differently. The GeForce RTX 4070 uses DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation, while the Radeon RX 5700M relies on FSR Frame Generation. Both can significantly boost FPS in supported titles, but they are not on the same feature stack.The GeForce RTX 4070 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon RX 5700M relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | Radeon RX 5700M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation | FSR Frame Generation |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 4070 comes with 12 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 5700M has 8 GB. The GeForce RTX 4070 offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 504 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 384 GB/s (Radeon RX 5700M) — a 31.3% advantage for the GeForce RTX 4070. Bus width: 192-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 36 MB (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 8 MB (Radeon RX 5700M) — the GeForce RTX 4070 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | Radeon RX 5700M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 12 GB+50% | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6X | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 504 GB/s+31% | 384 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 192-bit | 256-bit+33% |
| L2 Cache | 36 MB+350% | 8 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 12.1 (Radeon RX 5700M). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | Radeon RX 5700M |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.3+8% | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 8th Gen NVENC (2x) (GeForce RTX 4070) vs VCN 2.0 (Radeon RX 5700M). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs VCN 2.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon RX 5700M).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | Radeon RX 5700M |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 8th Gen NVENC (2x) | VCN 2.0 |
| Decoder | 5th Gen NVDEC | VCN 2.0 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 4070 draws 200W versus the Radeon RX 5700M's 180W — a 10.5% difference. The Radeon RX 5700M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 500W (Radeon RX 5700M). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 304mm vs 0mm, occupying 3 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 85°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | Radeon RX 5700M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 200W | 180W-10% |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 500W-23% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 304mm | 0mm |
| Height | 137mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 3 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C-6% | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 134.6+91% | 70.4 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 4070 is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2020).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | Radeon RX 5700M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $599 | — |
| Codename | AD104 | Navi 10 |
| Release | April 12 2023 | March 1 2020 |
| Ranking | #32 | #751 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












