
GeForce RTX 4070
Popular choices:

RadeonT RX 6850M XT
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 4070
2023Why buy it
- ✅36.5% more average FPS across 13 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $401 less on MSRP ($599 MSRP vs $1,000 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 221.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.9 vs 14.0 G3D/$ ($599 MSRP vs $1,000 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌21.2% higher power demand at 200W vs 165W.
RadeonT RX 6850M XT
2022Why buy it
- ✅Draws 165W instead of 200W, a 35W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4070 across 13 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4070 is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌66.9% HIGHER MSRP$1,000 MSRPvs$599 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 14.0 vs 44.9 G3D/$ ($1,000 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 4070
2023RadeonT RX 6850M XT
2022Why buy it
- ✅36.5% more average FPS across 13 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $401 less on MSRP ($599 MSRP vs $1,000 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 221.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.9 vs 14.0 G3D/$ ($599 MSRP vs $1,000 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅Draws 165W instead of 200W, a 35W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌21.2% higher power demand at 200W vs 165W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4070 across 13 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4070 is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌66.9% HIGHER MSRP$1,000 MSRPvs$599 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 14.0 vs 44.9 G3D/$ ($1,000 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 4070 better than RadeonT RX 6850M XT?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is RadeonT RX 6850M XT still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4070 | RadeonT RX 6850M XT |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 183 FPS | 179 FPS |
| medium | 167 FPS | 159 FPS |
| high | 151 FPS | 145 FPS |
| ultra | 131 FPS | 122 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 150 FPS | 145 FPS |
| medium | 124 FPS | 117 FPS |
| high | 110 FPS | 108 FPS |
| ultra | 101 FPS | 97 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 92 FPS | 87 FPS |
| medium | 78 FPS | 73 FPS |
| high | 65 FPS | 60 FPS |
| ultra | 58 FPS | 52 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4070 | RadeonT RX 6850M XT |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 544 FPS | 446 FPS |
| medium | 454 FPS | 365 FPS |
| high | 353 FPS | 296 FPS |
| ultra | 299 FPS | 243 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 351 FPS | 281 FPS |
| medium | 288 FPS | 229 FPS |
| high | 235 FPS | 195 FPS |
| ultra | 197 FPS | 162 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 172 FPS | 126 FPS |
| medium | 144 FPS | 107 FPS |
| high | 125 FPS | 90 FPS |
| ultra | 101 FPS | 69 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4070 | RadeonT RX 6850M XT |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 884 FPS | 630 FPS |
| medium | 713 FPS | 504 FPS |
| high | 643 FPS | 420 FPS |
| ultra | 569 FPS | 315 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 684 FPS | 472 FPS |
| medium | 549 FPS | 378 FPS |
| high | 483 FPS | 315 FPS |
| ultra | 424 FPS | 236 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 467 FPS | 315 FPS |
| medium | 373 FPS | 252 FPS |
| high | 326 FPS | 210 FPS |
| ultra | 277 FPS | 157 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4070 | RadeonT RX 6850M XT |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 751 FPS | 630 FPS |
| medium | 612 FPS | 504 FPS |
| high | 536 FPS | 420 FPS |
| ultra | 497 FPS | 315 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 615 FPS | 472 FPS |
| medium | 500 FPS | 378 FPS |
| high | 433 FPS | 315 FPS |
| ultra | 395 FPS | 236 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 384 FPS | 315 FPS |
| medium | 324 FPS | 252 FPS |
| high | 301 FPS | 210 FPS |
| ultra | 272 FPS | 157 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4070 and RadeonT RX 6850M XT

GeForce RTX 4070
GeForce RTX 4070
The GeForce RTX 4070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 12 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1920 MHz to 2475 MHz. It has 5888 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 26,919 points. Launch price was $599.

RadeonT RX 6850M XT
RadeonT RX 6850M XT
The RadeonT RX 6850M XT is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 4 2022. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2321 MHz to 2581 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 165W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 40 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,992 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4070 scores 26,919 versus the RadeonT RX 6850M XT's 13,992 — the GeForce RTX 4070 leads by 92.4%. The GeForce RTX 4070 is built on Ada Lovelace while the RadeonT RX 6850M XT uses RDNA 2.0, both on 5 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 5,888 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 2,560 (RadeonT RX 6850M XT). Raw compute: 29.15 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 13.21 TFLOPS (RadeonT RX 6850M XT). Boost clocks: 2475 MHz vs 2581 MHz. Ray tracing: 46 RT cores (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 40 (RadeonT RX 6850M XT) with 184 Tensor cores.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | RadeonT RX 6850M XT |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 26,919+92% | 13,992 |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | RDNA 2.0 |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 5888+130% | 2560 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 29.15 TFLOPS+121% | 13.21 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2475 MHz | 2581 MHz+4% |
| ROPs | 64 | 64 |
| TMUs | 184+15% | 160 |
| L1 Cache | 5.8 MB+1060% | 0.5 MB |
| L2 Cache | 36 MB+1100% | 3 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 46+15% | 40 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4070 is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The RadeonT RX 6850M XT lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 4070 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The RadeonT RX 6850M XT relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | RadeonT RX 6850M XT |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 12 GB of video memory. Bus width: 192-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 36 MB (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 3 MB (RadeonT RX 6850M XT) — the GeForce RTX 4070 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | RadeonT RX 6850M XT |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 12 GB | 12 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6X | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 192-bit+50% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 36 MB+1100% | 3 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 12.2 (RadeonT RX 6850M XT). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 1.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | RadeonT RX 6850M XT |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.4+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4+300% | 1 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 8th Gen NVENC (2x) (GeForce RTX 4070) vs VCN 3.0 (RadeonT RX 6850M XT). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs VCN 3.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (RadeonT RX 6850M XT).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | RadeonT RX 6850M XT |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 8th Gen NVENC (2x) | VCN 3.0 |
| Decoder | 5th Gen NVDEC | VCN 3.0 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 4070 draws 200W versus the RadeonT RX 6850M XT's 165W — a 19.2% difference. The RadeonT RX 6850M XT is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 500W (RadeonT RX 6850M XT). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 304mm vs 0mm, occupying 3 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 85°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | RadeonT RX 6850M XT |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 200W | 165W-18% |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 500W-23% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 304mm | 0mm |
| Height | 137mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 3 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C-6% | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 134.6+59% | 84.8 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 4070 launched at $599 MSRP, while the RadeonT RX 6850M XT launched at $1000. The GeForce RTX 4070 costs 40.1% less ($401 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 44.9 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 14.0 (RadeonT RX 6850M XT) — the GeForce RTX 4070 offers 220.7% better value. The GeForce RTX 4070 is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2022).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | RadeonT RX 6850M XT |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $599-40% | $1000 |
| Performance per Dollar | 44.9+221% | 14.0 |
| Codename | AD104 | Navi 22 |
| Release | April 12 2023 | January 4 2022 |
| Ranking | #32 | #103 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












