GeForce RTX 5090 vs GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
GeForce RTX 5090
Popular choices:
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 5090
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce RTX 5090 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 226.8% higher G3D Mark score and 300% more VRAM (32 GB vs 8 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM.
| Insight | GeForce RTX 5090 | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+226.8%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-226.8%) |
| Longevity | 🏆Elite Architecture (Blackwell 2.0 (2025−2026) / 5nm) | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ampere (2020−2025) / 8nm) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (32 GB) | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (304mm) | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $150 versus $2,700 for the GeForce RTX 5090, it costs 94% less. While it maintains significantly lower raw performance, this results in a 450.7% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce RTX 5090 | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+450.7%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($2,700) | ✅More affordable ($150) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 5090 and GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
GeForce RTX 5090
The GeForce RTX 5090 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 30 2025. It features the Blackwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2017 MHz to 2407 MHz. It has 21760 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 575W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 170 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 38,867 points. Launch price was $1,999.
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 4 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1515 MHz to 1755 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 20 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,892 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 5090 scores 38,867 versus the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM's 11,892 — the GeForce RTX 5090 leads by 226.8%. The GeForce RTX 5090 is built on Blackwell 2.0 while the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM uses Ampere, both on 5 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 21,760 (GeForce RTX 5090) vs 2,560 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM). Raw compute: 104.8 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 5090) vs 8.986 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM). Boost clocks: 2407 MHz vs 1755 MHz. Ray tracing: 170 RT cores (GeForce RTX 5090) vs 20 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) with 680 Tensor cores vs 80.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 5090 | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 38,867+227% | 11,892 |
| Architecture | Blackwell 2.0 | Ampere |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 21760+750% | 2560 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 104.8 TFLOPS+1066% | 8.986 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2407 MHz+37% | 1755 MHz |
| ROPs | 176+450% | 32 |
| TMUs | 680+750% | 80 |
| L1 Cache | 21.3 MB+752% | 2.5 MB |
| L2 Cache | 96 MB+4700% | 2 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 170+750% | 20 |
| Tensor Cores | 680+750% | 80 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce RTX 5090 | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | DLSS 2.0 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 / AFMF (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 5090 comes with 32 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM has 8 GB. The GeForce RTX 5090 offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 1792 GB/s (GeForce RTX 5090) vs 224 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) — a 700% advantage for the GeForce RTX 5090. Bus width: 512-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 96 MB (GeForce RTX 5090) vs 2 MB (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) — the GeForce RTX 5090 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 5090 | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 32 GB+300% | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR7 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 1792 GB/s+700% | 224 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 512-bit+300% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 96 MB+4700% | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 5090) vs 12.2 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 5090 | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.4+8% | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 9th Gen NVENC (2x) (GeForce RTX 5090) vs 8th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM). Decoder: 6th Gen NVDEC vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 5090) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 5090 | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 9th Gen NVENC (2x) | 8th Gen NVENC |
| Decoder | 6th Gen NVDEC | 5th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 5090 draws 575W versus the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM's 130W — a 126.2% difference. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1000W (GeForce RTX 5090) vs 450W (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM). Power connectors: 16-pin (12VHPWR) vs 8-pin. Card length: 304mm vs 235mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 5090 | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 575W | 130W-77% |
| Recommended PSU | 1000W | 450W-55% |
| Power Connector | 16-pin (12VHPWR) | 8-pin |
| Length | 304mm | 235mm |
| Height | 137mm | 124mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | 75°C-12% |
| Perf/Watt | 67.6 | 91.5+35% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 5090 launched at $1999 MSRP and currently averages $2700, while the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM launched at $249 and now averages $150. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM costs 94.4% less ($2550 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 14.4 (GeForce RTX 5090) vs 79.3 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) — the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM offers 450.7% better value. The GeForce RTX 5090 is the newer GPU (2025 vs 2022).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 5090 | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1999 | $249-88% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $2700 | $150-94% |
| Performance per Dollar | 14.4 | 79.3+451% |
| Codename | GB202 | GA106 |
| Release | January 30 2025 | January 4 2022 |
| Ranking | #3 | #224 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce RTX 5090 and GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
