GeForce RTX 3050 OEM vs Arc A580
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
Popular choices:
Arc A580
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
Performance Per Dollar Arc A580
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Arc A580 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.4% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM.
| Insight | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Arc A580 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.4%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.4%) |
| Longevity | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ampere (2020−2025) / 8nm) | 🔮Strong Longevity (Generation 12.7 (2022−2023) / 6nm) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | Standard Size (271mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $150 versus $179 for the Arc A580, it costs 16% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 17.7% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Arc A580 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+17.7%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($150) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($179) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3050 OEM and Arc A580
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 4 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1515 MHz to 1755 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 20 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,892 points.
Arc A580
The Arc A580 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in October 10 2023. It features the Generation 12.7 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1700 MHz to 2000 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 175W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 24 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,060 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM scores 11,892 and the Arc A580 reaches 12,060 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is built on Ampere while the Arc A580 uses Generation 12.7, both on 8 nm vs 6 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 3,072 (Arc A580). Raw compute: 8.986 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 12.29 TFLOPS (Arc A580). Boost clocks: 1755 MHz vs 2000 MHz. Ray tracing: 20 RT cores (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 24 (Arc A580) with 80 Tensor cores vs 384.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Arc A580 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 11,892 | 12,060+1% |
| Architecture | Ampere | Generation 12.7 |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 6 nm |
| Shading Units | 2560 | 3072+20% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 8.986 TFLOPS | 12.29 TFLOPS+37% |
| Boost Clock | 1755 MHz | 2000 MHz+14% |
| ROPs | 32 | 96+200% |
| TMUs | 80 | 192+140% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 8 MB+300% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 20 | 24+20% |
| Tensor Cores | 80 | 384+380% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Arc A580 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Arc A580 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2.0 | XeSS |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 / AFMF (Compatible) | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 8 GB of GDDR6. Memory bandwidth: 224 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 512 GB/s (Arc A580) — a 128.6% advantage for the Arc A580. Bus width: 128-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 8 MB (Arc A580) — the Arc A580 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Arc A580 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 224 GB/s | 512 GB/s+129% |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 256-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 8 MB+300% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 12 Ultimate (Arc A580). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Arc A580 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2+2% | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 8th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs Xe Media Engine (Arc A580). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs Xe Media Engine. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs AV1,H.265,H.264,VP9 (Arc A580).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Arc A580 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 8th Gen NVENC | Xe Media Engine |
| Decoder | 5th Gen NVDEC | Xe Media Engine |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) | AV1,H.265,H.264,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM draws 130W versus the Arc A580's 175W — a 29.5% difference. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 450W (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 600W (Arc A580). Power connectors: 8-pin vs 2x 8-pin. Card length: 235mm vs 271mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 70.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Arc A580 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 130W-26% | 175W |
| Recommended PSU | 450W-25% | 600W |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | 2x 8-pin |
| Length | 235mm | 271mm |
| Height | 124mm | 132mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | 70-7% |
| Perf/Watt | 91.5+33% | 68.9 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM launched at $249 MSRP and currently averages $150, while the Arc A580 launched at $179 and now averages $179. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM costs 16.2% less ($29 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 79.3 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 67.4 (Arc A580) — the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM offers 17.7% better value. The Arc A580 is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2022).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Arc A580 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $249 | $179-28% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $150-16% | $179 |
| Performance per Dollar | 79.3+18% | 67.4 |
| Codename | GA106 | DG2-512 |
| Release | January 4 2022 | October 10 2023 |
| Ranking | #224 | #223 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce RTX 3050 OEM and Arc A580
