GeForce RTX 4070 vs Arc A580
GeForce RTX 4070
Popular choices:
Arc A580
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 4070
Performance Per Dollar Arc A580
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce RTX 4070 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 123.2% higher G3D Mark score and 50% more VRAM (12 GB vs 8 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Arc A580.
| Insight | GeForce RTX 4070 | Arc A580 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+123.2%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-123.2%) |
| Longevity | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) / 5nm) | 🔮Strong Longevity (Generation 12.7 (2022−2023) / 6nm) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (12 GB) | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (304mm) | Standard Size (271mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
The Arc A580 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $179 versus $550 for the GeForce RTX 4070, it costs 67% less. While it maintains significantly lower raw performance, this results in a 37.7% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce RTX 4070 | Arc A580 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+37.7%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($550) | ✅More affordable ($179) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4070 and Arc A580
GeForce RTX 4070
The GeForce RTX 4070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 12 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1920 MHz to 2475 MHz. It has 5888 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 26,919 points. Launch price was $599.
Arc A580
The Arc A580 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in October 10 2023. It features the Generation 12.7 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1700 MHz to 2000 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 175W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 24 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,060 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4070 scores 26,919 versus the Arc A580's 12,060 — the GeForce RTX 4070 leads by 123.2%. The GeForce RTX 4070 is built on Ada Lovelace while the Arc A580 uses Generation 12.7, both on 5 nm vs 6 nm. Shader units: 5,888 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 3,072 (Arc A580). Raw compute: 29.15 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 12.29 TFLOPS (Arc A580). Boost clocks: 2475 MHz vs 2000 MHz. Ray tracing: 46 RT cores (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 24 (Arc A580) with 184 Tensor cores vs 384.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | Arc A580 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 26,919+123% | 12,060 |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Generation 12.7 |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 6 nm |
| Shading Units | 5888+92% | 3072 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 29.15 TFLOPS+137% | 12.29 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2475 MHz+24% | 2000 MHz |
| ROPs | 64 | 96+50% |
| TMUs | 184 | 192+4% |
| L2 Cache | 36 MB+350% | 8 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 46+92% | 24 |
| Tensor Cores | 184 | 384+109% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4070 is support for DLSS 3 Frame Gen. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Arc A580 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 4070 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Arc A580 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | Arc A580 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 | XeSS |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.0 (Native) | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 4070 comes with 12 GB of VRAM, while the Arc A580 has 8 GB. The GeForce RTX 4070 offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 504 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 512 GB/s (Arc A580) — a 1.6% advantage for the Arc A580. Bus width: 192-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 36 MB (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 8 MB (Arc A580) — the GeForce RTX 4070 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | Arc A580 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 12 GB+50% | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6X | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 504 GB/s | 512 GB/s+2% |
| Bus Width | 192-bit | 256-bit+33% |
| L2 Cache | 36 MB+350% | 8 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 12 Ultimate (Arc A580). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | Arc A580 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2+2% | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 8th Gen NVENC (2x) (GeForce RTX 4070) vs Xe Media Engine (Arc A580). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs Xe Media Engine. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs AV1,H.265,H.264,VP9 (Arc A580).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | Arc A580 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 8th Gen NVENC (2x) | Xe Media Engine |
| Decoder | 5th Gen NVDEC | Xe Media Engine |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 | AV1,H.265,H.264,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 4070 draws 200W versus the Arc A580's 175W — a 13.3% difference. The Arc A580 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 600W (Arc A580). Power connectors: 8-pin vs 2x 8-pin. Card length: 304mm vs 271mm, occupying 3 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 70.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | Arc A580 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 200W | 175W-13% |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 600W-8% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | 2x 8-pin |
| Length | 304mm | 271mm |
| Height | 137mm | 132mm |
| Slots | 3 | 2-33% |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 70-13% |
| Perf/Watt | 134.6+95% | 68.9 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 4070 launched at $599 MSRP and currently averages $550, while the Arc A580 launched at $179 and now averages $179. The Arc A580 costs 67.5% less ($371 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 48.9 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 67.4 (Arc A580) — the Arc A580 offers 37.8% better value.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | Arc A580 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $599 | $179-70% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $550 | $179-67% |
| Performance per Dollar | 48.9 | 67.4+38% |
| Codename | AD104 | DG2-512 |
| Release | April 12 2023 | October 10 2023 |
| Ranking | #32 | #223 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce RTX 4070 and Arc A580
