GeForce4 MX 440 vs GeForce 6200A

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The GeForce4 MX 440 is positioned at rank #750 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce4 MX 440

#739

Radeon RX 550X (móvel)

MSRP: $35|Avg: $35

361900%

#741

GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $150

328067%

#742

GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $100

327200%

#746

GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50

297533%

#747

Radeon RX 6300

MSRP: $60|Avg: $40

295500%

#749

GeForce2 MX/MX 400

MSRP: $129|Avg: $15

100%

#750

GeForce4 MX 440

MSRP: $149|Avg: $49

100%

#751

RADEON 7200

MSRP: $99|Avg: $45

100%

#752

GeForce 256

MSRP: $199|Avg: $20

100%

#753

GeForce2 MX

MSRP: $129|Avg: $49

67%

#754

GeForce4 440

MSRP: $469|Avg: $49

33%

#755

GeForce3

MSRP: $499|Avg: $49

33%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The GeForce4 MX 440 uses modern memory architecture. The GeForce4 MX 440 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce 6200A lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce4 MX 440 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 25% higher G3D Mark score. However, the GeForce 6200A offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.

Insight	GeForce4 MX 440	GeForce 6200A
Performance	✅Leading raw performance (+25%)	❌Lower raw frame rates (-25%)
Longevity	Turing (2018−2022) (12nm)	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell (2014−2017))
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	❌ Less VRAM capacity	✅ More VRAM (+98.4%)
Efficiency	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt	⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce4 MX 440 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce4 MX 440 Benchmark Check

GeForce 6200A Benchmark Check

Loading...

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce4 MX 440 and GeForce 6200A

GeForce4 MX 440

The GeForce4 MX 440 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 1 2020. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1395 MHz to 1575 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 25W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5 points.

GeForce 6200A

The GeForce 6200A is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 13 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 928 MHz to 941 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce4 MX 440 scores 5 versus the GeForce 6200A's 4 — the GeForce4 MX 440 leads by 25%. The GeForce4 MX 440 is built on Turing while the GeForce 6200A uses Maxwell, both on 12 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 896 (GeForce4 MX 440) vs 384 (GeForce 6200A). Raw compute: 3.226 TFLOPS (GeForce4 MX 440) vs 0.7227 TFLOPS (GeForce 6200A). Boost clocks: 1575 MHz vs 941 MHz.

Feature	GeForce4 MX 440	GeForce 6200A
G3D Mark Score	5+25%	4
Architecture	Turing	Maxwell
Process Node	12 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	896+133%	384
Compute (TFLOPS)	3.226 TFLOPS+346%	0.7227 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	1575 MHz+67%	941 MHz
ROPs	32+300%	8
TMUs	64+167%	24

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	GeForce4 MX 440	GeForce 6200A
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce4 MX 440 comes with 65 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce 6200A has 128 MB. The GeForce 6200A offers 98.4% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit.

Feature	GeForce4 MX 440	GeForce 6200A
VRAM Capacity	0.063 GB	0.125 GB+98%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	128-bit+100%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 7.0 (GeForce4 MX 440) vs 9.0c (GeForce 6200A). OpenGL: 1.5 vs 2.1. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.

Feature	GeForce4 MX 440	GeForce 6200A
DirectX	7.0	9.0c+29%
OpenGL	1.5	2.1+40%
Max Displays	2	2

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: None (GeForce4 MX 440) vs No (GeForce 6200A). Decoder: MPEG-2 Decoder vs PureVideo. Supported codecs: MPEG-2 (GeForce4 MX 440) vs MPEG-2 (GeForce 6200A).

Feature	GeForce4 MX 440	GeForce 6200A
Encoder	None	No
Decoder	MPEG-2 Decoder	PureVideo
Codecs	MPEG-2	MPEG-2

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce4 MX 440 draws 25W versus the GeForce 6200A's 33W — a 27.6% difference. The GeForce4 MX 440 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce4 MX 440) vs 350W (GeForce 6200A). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Legacy. Card length: 165mm vs 168mm, occupying 1 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 60°C vs 65°C.

Feature	GeForce4 MX 440	GeForce 6200A
TDP	25W-24%	33W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	Legacy
Length	165mm	168mm
Height	100mm	100mm
Slots	1	1
Temp (Load)	60°C-8%	65°C
Perf/Watt	0.2+100%	0.1

💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce4 MX 440 launched at $149 MSRP and currently averages $49, while the GeForce 6200A launched at $0 and now averages $0. The GeForce 6200A costs 100+% less ($49 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 0.1 (GeForce4 MX 440) vs Infinity (GeForce 6200A) — the GeForce 6200A offers Infinity% better value. The GeForce4 MX 440 is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2015).

Feature	GeForce4 MX 440	GeForce 6200A
MSRP	$149	$0-100%
Avg Price (30d)	$49	$0-100%
Performance per Dollar	0.1	Infinity
Codename	N17S-G5 / GP107-670-A1	GM108
Release	August 1 2020	March 13 2015
Ranking	#523	#810