CPU
GPU
GeForce4 Ti 4400
Popular choices:
GeForce 7000M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce4 Ti 4400 is positioned at rank 384 and the GeForce 7000M is on rank 735, so the GeForce4 Ti 4400 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce4 Ti 4400
Performance Per Dollar GeForce 7000M
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The GeForce4 Ti 4400 is significantly newer (2022 vs 2015). The GeForce4 Ti 4400 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce 7000M lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce 7000M is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 85.7% higher G3D Mark score. However, the GeForce4 Ti 4400 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | GeForce4 Ti 4400 | GeForce 7000M |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-85.7%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+85.7%) |
| Longevity | Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) (5nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell (2014−2017)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce 7000M remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce4 Ti 4400 and GeForce 7000M
GeForce4 Ti 4400
The GeForce4 Ti 4400 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 20 2022. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2235 MHz to 2520 MHz. It has 16384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 450W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 128 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7 points. Launch price was $1,599.
GeForce 7000M
The GeForce 7000M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 13 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1072 MHz to 1176 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce4 Ti 4400 scores 7 versus the GeForce 7000M's 13 — the GeForce 7000M leads by 85.7%. The GeForce4 Ti 4400 is built on Ada Lovelace while the GeForce 7000M uses Maxwell, both on 5 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 16,384 (GeForce4 Ti 4400) vs 384 (GeForce 7000M). Raw compute: 82.58 TFLOPS (GeForce4 Ti 4400) vs 0.9032 TFLOPS (GeForce 7000M). Boost clocks: 2520 MHz vs 1176 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce4 Ti 4400 | GeForce 7000M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 7 | 13+86% |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Maxwell |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 16384+4167% | 384 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 82.58 TFLOPS+9043% | 0.9032 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2520 MHz+114% | 1176 MHz |
| ROPs | 176+2100% | 8 |
| TMUs | 512+2033% | 24 |
| L1 Cache | 16 MB+8321% | 0.19 MB |
| L2 Cache | 72 MB+7100% | 1 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce4 Ti 4400 | GeForce 7000M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce4 Ti 4400 comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce 7000M has 256 MB. The GeForce4 Ti 4400 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 72 MB (GeForce4 Ti 4400) vs 1 MB (GeForce 7000M) — the GeForce4 Ti 4400 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce4 Ti 4400 | GeForce 7000M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB+100% | 0.25 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 72 MB+7100% | 1 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 8.1 (GeForce4 Ti 4400) vs 9.0c (GeForce 7000M). OpenGL: 1.3 vs 2.1. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 1.
| Feature | GeForce4 Ti 4400 | GeForce 7000M |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 8.1 | 9.0c+11% |
| OpenGL | 1.3 | 2.1+62% |
| Max Displays | 2+100% | 1 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: None (GeForce4 Ti 4400) vs No (GeForce 7000M). Decoder: MPEG-2 Decoder vs PureVideo. Supported codecs: MPEG-2 (GeForce4 Ti 4400) vs MPEG-2 (GeForce 7000M).
| Feature | GeForce4 Ti 4400 | GeForce 7000M |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | None | No |
| Decoder | MPEG-2 Decoder | PureVideo |
| Codecs | MPEG-2 | MPEG-2 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce4 Ti 4400 draws 450W versus the GeForce 7000M's 33W — a 172.7% difference. The GeForce 7000M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce4 Ti 4400) vs 350W (GeForce 7000M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Legacy. Card length: 216mm vs 0mm, occupying 1 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 65°C vs 85°C.
| Feature | GeForce4 Ti 4400 | GeForce 7000M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 450W | 33W-93% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Legacy |
| Length | 216mm | 0mm |
| Height | 100mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 1 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 65°C-24% | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 0.0 | 0.4 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce4 Ti 4400 is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2015).
| Feature | GeForce4 Ti 4400 | GeForce 7000M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $299 | — |
| Avg Price (30d) | $49 | — |
| Codename | AD102 | GM108 |
| Release | September 20 2022 | March 13 2015 |
| Ranking | #4 | #847 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce4 Ti 4400 and GeForce 7000M
