GeForce4 Ti 4400 vs GeForce GTX 1060
GeForce4 Ti 4400
Popular choices:
GeForce GTX 1060
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The GeForce4 Ti 4400 is positioned at rank #384 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce4 Ti 4400
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The GeForce4 Ti 4400 is significantly newer (2022 vs 2016). The GeForce4 Ti 4400 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce GTX 1060 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce GTX 1060 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 143671.4% higher G3D Mark score and 1100% more VRAM (6 GB vs 512 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce4 Ti 4400.
| Insight | GeForce4 Ti 4400 | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-143671.4%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+143671.4%) |
| Longevity | Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) (5nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / Pascal (2016−2021)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+1100%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce GTX 1060 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Although it costs $60 (vs $49), its significant performance lead justifies the premium, offering 117313.3% better value per dollar than the GeForce4 Ti 4400.
| Insight | GeForce4 Ti 4400 | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+117313.3%) |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($49) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($60) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce4 Ti 4400 and GeForce GTX 1060
GeForce4 Ti 4400
The GeForce4 Ti 4400 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 20 2022. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2235 MHz to 2520 MHz. It has 16384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 450W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 128 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7 points. Launch price was $1,599.
GeForce GTX 1060
The GeForce GTX 1060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1607 MHz to 1733 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,064 points. Launch price was $599.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce4 Ti 4400 scores 7 versus the GeForce GTX 1060's 10,064 — the GeForce GTX 1060 leads by 143671.4%. The GeForce4 Ti 4400 is built on Ada Lovelace while the GeForce GTX 1060 uses Pascal, both on 5 nm vs 16 nm. Shader units: 16,384 (GeForce4 Ti 4400) vs 2,560 (GeForce GTX 1060). Raw compute: 82.58 TFLOPS (GeForce4 Ti 4400) vs 8.873 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1060). Boost clocks: 2520 MHz vs 1733 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce4 Ti 4400 | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 7 | 10,064+143671% |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Pascal |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 16 nm |
| Shading Units | 16384+540% | 2560 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 82.58 TFLOPS+831% | 8.873 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2520 MHz+45% | 1733 MHz |
| ROPs | 176+175% | 64 |
| TMUs | 512+220% | 160 |
| L1 Cache | 16 MB+1602% | 0.94 MB |
| L2 Cache | 72 MB+3500% | 2 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce4 Ti 4400 | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce4 Ti 4400 comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 1060 has 6 GB. The GeForce GTX 1060 offers 1100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 192-bit. L2 Cache: 72 MB (GeForce4 Ti 4400) vs 2 MB (GeForce GTX 1060) — the GeForce4 Ti 4400 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce4 Ti 4400 | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 6 GB+1100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 192-bit+200% |
| L2 Cache | 72 MB+3500% | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 8.1 (GeForce4 Ti 4400) vs 12 (GeForce GTX 1060). OpenGL: 1.3 vs 4.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce4 Ti 4400 | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 8.1 | 12+48% |
| OpenGL | 1.3 | 4.5+246% |
| Max Displays | 2 | 4+100% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: None (GeForce4 Ti 4400) vs NVENC (Pascal) (GeForce GTX 1060). Decoder: MPEG-2 Decoder vs NVDEC (Pascal). Supported codecs: MPEG-2 (GeForce4 Ti 4400) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC (GeForce GTX 1060).
| Feature | GeForce4 Ti 4400 | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | None | NVENC (Pascal) |
| Decoder | MPEG-2 Decoder | NVDEC (Pascal) |
| Codecs | MPEG-2 | H.264,H.265/HEVC |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce4 Ti 4400 draws 450W versus the GeForce GTX 1060's 180W — a 85.7% difference. The GeForce GTX 1060 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce4 Ti 4400) vs 400W (GeForce GTX 1060). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 6-pin. Card length: 216mm vs 173mm, occupying 1 vs 2 slots.
| Feature | GeForce4 Ti 4400 | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 450W | 180W-60% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-13% | 400W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 6-pin |
| Length | 216mm | 173mm |
| Height | 100mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 1-50% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 65°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 0.0 | 55.9 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce4 Ti 4400 launched at $299 MSRP and currently averages $49, while the GeForce GTX 1060 launched at $249 and now averages $60. The GeForce4 Ti 4400 costs 18.3% less ($11 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 0.1 (GeForce4 Ti 4400) vs 167.7 (GeForce GTX 1060) — the GeForce GTX 1060 offers 167600% better value. The GeForce4 Ti 4400 is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2016).
| Feature | GeForce4 Ti 4400 | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $299 | $249-17% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $49-18% | $60 |
| Performance per Dollar | 0.1 | 167.7+167600% |
| Codename | AD102 | GP104 |
| Release | September 20 2022 | May 27 2016 |
| Ranking | #4 | #137 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce4 Ti 4400 and GeForce GTX 1060
