GeForce4 Ti 4800 vs GeForce3
GeForce4 Ti 4800
Popular choices:
GeForce3
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce4 Ti 4800 is positioned at rank 384 and the GeForce3 is on rank 755, so the GeForce4 Ti 4800 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce4 Ti 4800
Performance Per Dollar GeForce3
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce4 Ti 4800 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 20% higher G3D Mark score and 693.7% more VRAM (512 MB vs 65 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce3.
| Insight | GeForce4 Ti 4800 | GeForce3 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+20%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-20%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / Fermi (2010−2014)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell (2014−2017)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+693.7%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce4 Ti 4800 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce4 Ti 4800 holds the technical lead. Priced at $40 (vs $49), it costs 18% less, resulting in a 47% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce4 Ti 4800 | GeForce3 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+47%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($40) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($49) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce4 Ti 4800 and GeForce3
GeForce4 Ti 4800
The GeForce4 Ti 4800 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 26 2010. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 700 MHz. It has 480 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6 points. Launch price was $499.
GeForce3
The GeForce3 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 13 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 928 MHz to 941 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce4 Ti 4800 scores 6 versus the GeForce3's 5 — the GeForce4 Ti 4800 leads by 20%. The GeForce4 Ti 4800 is built on Fermi while the GeForce3 uses Maxwell, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 480 (GeForce4 Ti 4800) vs 384 (GeForce3). Raw compute: 1.345 TFLOPS (GeForce4 Ti 4800) vs 0.7227 TFLOPS (GeForce3).
| Feature | GeForce4 Ti 4800 | GeForce3 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 6+20% | 5 |
| Architecture | Fermi | Maxwell |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 480+25% | 384 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.345 TFLOPS+86% | 0.7227 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 48+500% | 8 |
| TMUs | 60+150% | 24 |
| L1 Cache | 960 KB+400% | 192 KB |
| L2 Cache | 0.75 MB | 1 MB+33% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce4 Ti 4800 | GeForce3 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce4 Ti 4800 comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce3 has 65 MB. The GeForce4 Ti 4800 offers 693.7% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 0.75 MB (GeForce4 Ti 4800) vs 1 MB (GeForce3) — the GeForce3 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce4 Ti 4800 | GeForce3 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB+694% | 0.063 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 0.75 MB | 1 MB+33% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 8.1 (GeForce4 Ti 4800) vs 8.1 (GeForce3). Vulkan: None vs N/A. OpenGL: 1.3 vs 1.3. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.
| Feature | GeForce4 Ti 4800 | GeForce3 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Vulkan | None | N/A |
| OpenGL | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| Max Displays | 2 | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: No (GeForce4 Ti 4800) vs None (GeForce3). Decoder: No vs None.
| Feature | GeForce4 Ti 4800 | GeForce3 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | No | None |
| Decoder | No | None |
| Codecs | MPEG-1,MPEG-2 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce4 Ti 4800 draws 250W versus the GeForce3's 33W — a 153.4% difference. The GeForce3 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce4 Ti 4800) vs 350W (GeForce3). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 216mm vs 165mm, occupying 1 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 65°C vs 85.
| Feature | GeForce4 Ti 4800 | GeForce3 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 250W | 33W-87% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 216mm | 165mm |
| Height | 111mm | 100mm |
| Slots | 1 | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | 65°C-24% | 85 |
| Perf/Watt | 0.0 | 0.2 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce4 Ti 4800 launched at $399 MSRP and currently averages $40, while the GeForce3 launched at $499 and now averages $49. The GeForce4 Ti 4800 costs 18.4% less ($9 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 0.1 (GeForce4 Ti 4800) vs 0.1 (GeForce3) — the GeForce3 offers 0% better value. The GeForce3 is the newer GPU (2015 vs 2010).
| Feature | GeForce4 Ti 4800 | GeForce3 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $399-20% | $499 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $40-18% | $49 |
| Performance per Dollar | 0.1 | 0.1 |
| Codename | GF100 | GM108 |
| Release | March 26 2010 | March 13 2015 |
| Ranking | #488 | #810 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce4 Ti 4800 and GeForce3
