Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) vs GRID P40-12Q
Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc)
Popular choices:
GRID P40-12Q
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar GRID P40-12Q
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) is significantly newer (2023 vs 2015). The Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GRID P40-12Q lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GRID P40-12Q is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.7% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc).
| Insight | Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) | GRID P40-12Q |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.7%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.7%) |
| Longevity | Xe LPG (2023) (5nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the GRID P40-12Q remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) and GRID P40-12Q
Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc)
The Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) is manufactured by Intel. It was released in December 14 2023. It features the Xe LPG architecture. The boost clock speed is 1950 MHz. It has 4 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,500 points.
GRID P40-12Q
The GRID P40-12Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 557 MHz to 1178 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,540 points.
Graphics Performance
The Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) scores 5,500 and the GRID P40-12Q reaches 5,540 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) is built on Xe LPG while the GRID P40-12Q uses Maxwell 2.0, both on 5 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 4 (Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc)) vs 2,048 (GRID P40-12Q). Boost clocks: 1950 MHz vs 1178 MHz.
| Feature | Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) | GRID P40-12Q |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 5,500 | 5,540 |
| Architecture | Xe LPG | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 4 | 2048+51100% |
| Boost Clock | 1950 MHz+66% | 1178 MHz |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) | GRID P40-12Q |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | XeSS | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 (Compatible) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 4 GB of video memory. Bus width: System vs 128-bit.
| Feature | Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) | GRID P40-12Q |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | Shared | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | System | 128-bit |
Power & Dimensions
The Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) draws 15W versus the GRID P40-12Q's 225W — a 175% difference. The Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc)) vs 350W (GRID P40-12Q). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) | GRID P40-12Q |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 15W-93% | 225W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 0mm | — |
| Slots | 0 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 366.7+1391% | 24.6 |
Value Analysis
The Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) launched at $0 MSRP and currently averages $0, while the GRID P40-12Q launched at $5699 and now averages $5699. The Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) costs 100+% less ($5699 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): Infinity (Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc)) vs 1.0 (GRID P40-12Q) — the Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) offers Infinity% better value. The Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2015).
| Feature | Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) | GRID P40-12Q |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0-100% | $5699 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $0-100% | $5699 |
| Performance per Dollar | Infinity | 1.0 |
| Codename | Meteor Lake iGPU | GM204 |
| Release | December 14 2023 | August 30 2015 |
| Ranking | #494 | #433 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) and GRID P40-12Q
