
Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) vs L2

Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc)
Popular choices:

L2
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar L2
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.6% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the L2.
| Insight | Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) | L2 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.6%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.6%) |
| Longevity | Xe LPG (2023) (5nm) | Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) (5nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) and L2

Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc)
The Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) is manufactured by Intel. It was released in December 14 2023. It features the Xe LPG architecture. The boost clock speed is 1950 MHz. It has 4 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,500 points.

L2
The L2 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 16 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1440 MHz to 2520 MHz. It has 11776 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 275W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 92 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,467 points.
Graphics Performance
The Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) scores 5,500 and the L2 reaches 5,467 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) is built on Xe LPG while the L2 uses Ada Lovelace, both on a 5 nm process. Shader units: 4 (Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc)) vs 11,776 (L2). Boost clocks: 1950 MHz vs 2520 MHz.
| Feature | Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) | L2 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 5,500 | 5,467 |
| Architecture | Xe LPG | Ada Lovelace |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 4 | 11776+294300% |
| Boost Clock | 1950 MHz | 2520 MHz+29% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) | L2 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | XeSS | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 (Compatible) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 4 GB of video memory. Bus width: System vs 128-bit.
| Feature | Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) | L2 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | Shared | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | System | 128-bit |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12_2 (Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc)) vs 12_2 (L2). Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 0.
| Feature | Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) | L2 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12_2 | 12_2 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 0 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: QuickSync (Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc)) vs NVENC 8th Gen (L2). Decoder: QuickSync vs NVDEC 5th Gen. Supported codecs: MPEG2,AVC,VP9,HEVC,AV1 (Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc)) vs H.264,H.265,AV1 (L2).
| Feature | Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) | L2 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | QuickSync | NVENC 8th Gen |
| Decoder | QuickSync | NVDEC 5th Gen |
| Codecs | MPEG2,AVC,VP9,HEVC,AV1 | H.264,H.265,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) draws 15W versus the L2's 275W — a 179.3% difference. The Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc)) vs 350W (L2). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 168mm, occupying 0 vs 1 slots.
| Feature | Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) | L2 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 15W-95% | 275W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 0mm | 168mm |
| Height | — | 69mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 1 |
| Perf/Watt | 366.7+1743% | 19.9 |
Value Analysis
The Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) launched at $0 MSRP and currently averages $0, while the L2 launched at $2000 and now averages $1500. The Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) costs 100+% less ($1500 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): Infinity (Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc)) vs 3.6 (L2) — the Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) offers Infinity% better value.
| Feature | Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) | L2 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0-100% | $2000 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $0-100% | $1500 |
| Performance per Dollar | Infinity | 3.6 |
| Codename | Meteor Lake iGPU | AD102 |
| Release | December 14 2023 | November 16 2023 |
| Ranking | #494 | #189 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
















