Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) vs Radeon TM

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon TM

#19

Radeon RX 5600

MSRP: $229|Avg: $150

92%

#45

Radeon RX 550X (móvel)

MSRP: $35|Avg: $35

195%

#47

GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $150

177%

#48

GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $100

176%

#52

GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50

160%

#53

Radeon RX 6300

MSRP: $60|Avg: $40

159%

#55

Radeon TM

MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A

100%

#58

GeForce 770M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $40

97%

#62

Radeon 820M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $25

96%

#65

GeForce GTX 1650 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $100

95%

#66

GeForce GTX 1050 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50

94%

#68

GeForce GTX 850M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $40

91%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Radeon TM is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.2% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc).

Insight	Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc)	Radeon TM
Performance	❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.2%)	✅Leading raw performance (+1.2%)
Longevity	Xe LPG (2023) (5nm)	RDNA 3.5 (2024−2025) (4nm)
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	❌ Less VRAM capacity	✅ More VRAM (+0%)
Efficiency	Normal Efficiency	Normal Efficiency
Case Fit	—	—

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the Radeon TM remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) Benchmark Check

Radeon TM Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) and Radeon TM

Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc)

The Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) is manufactured by Intel. It was released in December 14 2023. It features the Xe LPG architecture. The boost clock speed is 1950 MHz. It has 4 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,500 points.

Radeon TM

The Radeon TM is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 15 2024. It features the RDNA 3.5 architecture. The core clock ranges from 400 MHz to 2900 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 16 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,564 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) scores 5,500 and the Radeon TM reaches 5,564 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) is built on Xe LPG while the Radeon TM uses RDNA 3.5, both on 5 nm vs 4 nm. Shader units: 4 (Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc)) vs 1,024 (Radeon TM). Boost clocks: 1950 MHz vs 2900 MHz.

Feature	Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc)	Radeon TM
G3D Mark Score	5,500	5,564+1%
Architecture	Xe LPG	RDNA 3.5
Process Node	5 nm	4 nm
Shading Units	4	1024+25500%
Boost Clock	1950 MHz	2900 MHz+49%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc)	Radeon TM
Upscaling Tech	XeSS	FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation	FSR 3 (Compatible)	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 4 GB of video memory. Bus width: System vs 128-bit.

Feature	Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc)	Radeon TM
VRAM Capacity	4 GB	4 GB
Memory Type	Shared	GDDR6
Bus Width	System	128-bit

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) draws 15W versus the Radeon TM's 15W — a 0% difference. The Radeon TM is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc)) vs 350W (Radeon TM). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.