GRID K160Q vs Radeon HD 5600/5700

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GRID K160Q vs Radeon HD 5600/5700 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GRID K160Q vs Radeon HD 5600/5700: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GRID K160Q

2013

Why buy it

✅More future proof: Kepler (2012−2018) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌2013 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
26.3% HIGHER MSRP
$125 MSRPvs$99 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 5.0 vs 6.2 G3D/$ ($125 MSRP vs $99 MSRP).

Radeon HD 5600/5700

2010

Why buy it

✅Costs $26 less on MSRP ($99 MSRP vs $125 MSRP).
✅Delivers 23.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 6.2 vs 5.0 G3D/$ ($99 MSRP vs $125 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌2010 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GRID K160Q is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 2.1% in PassMark G3D (628 vs 615), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GRID K160Q is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 28nm process instead of 40nm and a newer 2013 generation instead of 2010. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon HD 5600/5700 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $26 cheaper on MSRP at $99 vs $125, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 23.6% (6.2 vs 5.0), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon HD 5600/5700 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, GRID K160Q has the stronger long-term case.

GRID K160Q vs Radeon HD 5600/5700 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GRID K160Q

The GRID K160Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 28 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 745 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 628 points. Launch price was $937.

Radeon HD 5600/5700

The Radeon HD 5600/5700 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in December 14 2010. It features the TeraScale 3 architecture. The boost clock speed is 880 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 615 points. Launch price was $369.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GRID K160Q scores 628 and the Radeon HD 5600/5700 reaches 615 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GRID K160Q is built on Kepler while the Radeon HD 5600/5700 uses TeraScale 3, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 1,536 (GRID K160Q) vs 1,536 (Radeon HD 5600/5700). Raw compute: 2.289 TFLOPS (GRID K160Q) vs 2.703 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 5600/5700).

Feature	GRID K160Q	Radeon HD 5600/5700
G3D Mark Score	628+2%	615
Architecture	Kepler	TeraScale 3
Process Node	28 nm	40 nm
Shading Units	1536	1536
Compute (TFLOPS)	2.289 TFLOPS	2.703 TFLOPS+18%
ROPs	32	32
TMUs	128+33%	96
L1 Cache	128 KB	192 KB+50%
L2 Cache	512 KB	512 KB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	GRID K160Q	Radeon HD 5600/5700
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 512 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GRID K160Q and 128-bit on the Radeon HD 5600/5700.

Feature	GRID K160Q	Radeon HD 5600/5700
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	128-bit+100%
L2 Cache	512 KB	512 KB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GRID K160Q draws 225W versus the Radeon HD 5600/5700's 250W — a 10.5% difference. The GRID K160Q is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GRID K160Q) vs 350W (Radeon HD 5600/5700). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None.

Feature	GRID K160Q	Radeon HD 5600/5700
TDP	225W-10%	250W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	None
Length	—	168mm
Height	—	111mm
Slots	—	1
Temp (Load)	—	70°C
Perf/Watt	2.8+12%	2.5

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GRID K160Q came in at $125, while the Radeon HD 5600/5700 launched at $99. On MSRP, Radeon HD 5600/5700 was 20.8% cheaper ($26 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 5.0 (GRID K160Q) vs 6.2 (Radeon HD 5600/5700) — the Radeon HD 5600/5700 offers 24% better value. The newer card here is GRID K160Q (2013 vs 2010).

Feature	GRID K160Q	Radeon HD 5600/5700
MSRP	$125	$99-21%
Performance per Dollar	5.0	6.2+24%
Codename	GK104	Cayman
Release	June 28 2013	December 14 2010
Ranking	#589	#596

Search GRID K160Q on Amazon

Search Radeon HD 5600/5700 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.