GRID K160Q vs Radeon R6

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GRID K160Q vs Radeon R6 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GRID K160Q vs Radeon R6: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GRID K160Q

2013

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 5.0 vs 0 G3D/$ ($125 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (512 MB vs Unknown).
✅Radeon R6 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so GRID K160Q is the less risky modern option long term.

Trade-offs

❌2013 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌350% higher power demand at 225W vs 50W.

Radeon R6

2019

Why buy it

✅Draws 50W instead of 225W, a 175W reduction.
✅More future proof: GCN 4.0 (2016−2020) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 512 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2019 hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 5.0 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $125 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GRID K160Q is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 2.6% in PassMark G3D (628 vs 612), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GRID K160Q is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 512 MB vs Unknown of VRAM. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GRID K160Q makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup.

GRID K160Q vs Radeon R6 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GRID K160Q

The GRID K160Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 28 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 745 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 628 points. Launch price was $937.

Radeon R6

The Radeon R6 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 13 2019. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1082 MHz to 1218 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 612 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GRID K160Q scores 628 and the Radeon R6 reaches 612 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GRID K160Q is built on Kepler while the Radeon R6 uses GCN 4.0, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 1,536 (GRID K160Q) vs 512 (Radeon R6). Raw compute: 2.289 TFLOPS (GRID K160Q) vs 1.247 TFLOPS (Radeon R6).

Feature	GRID K160Q	Radeon R6
G3D Mark Score	628+3%	612
Architecture	Kepler	GCN 4.0
Process Node	28 nm	14 nm
Shading Units	1536+200%	512
Compute (TFLOPS)	2.289 TFLOPS+84%	1.247 TFLOPS
ROPs	32+100%	16
TMUs	128+300%	32
L1 Cache	128 KB	128 KB
L2 Cache	512 KB	512 KB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	GRID K160Q	Radeon R6
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GRID K160Q has 512 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon R6 carries 0 MB. GRID K160Q gives you 100+% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GRID K160Q and 64-bit on the Radeon R6.

Feature	GRID K160Q	Radeon R6
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB	0 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	64-bit
L2 Cache	512 KB	512 KB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GRID K160Q draws 225W versus the Radeon R6's 50W — a 127.3% difference. The Radeon R6 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GRID K160Q) vs 350W (Radeon R6). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	GRID K160Q	Radeon R6
TDP	225W	50W-78%
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Slots	—	0
Temp (Load)	—	65°C
Perf/Watt	2.8	12.2+336%

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GRID K160Q came in at $125, while the Radeon R6 launched at $0. On MSRP, Radeon R6 was 100+% cheaper ($125 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 5.0 (GRID K160Q) vs Infinity (Radeon R6) — the Radeon R6 offers Infinity% better value. The newer card here is Radeon R6 (2019 vs 2013).

Feature	GRID K160Q	Radeon R6
MSRP	$125	$0-100%
Performance per Dollar	5.0	Infinity
Codename	GK104	Polaris 23
Release	June 28 2013	May 13 2019
Ranking	#589	#757

Search GRID K160Q on Amazon

Search Radeon R6 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.