GRID K160Q vs Radeon R7 A360

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GRID K160Q vs Radeon R7 A360 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GRID K160Q vs Radeon R7 A360: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GRID K160Q

2013

Why buy it

✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

❌2013 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
14.7% HIGHER MSRP
$125 MSRPvs$109 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 5.0 vs 5.7 G3D/$ ($125 MSRP vs $109 MSRP).
❌181.3% higher power demand at 225W vs 80W.

Radeon R7 A360

2015

Why buy it

✅Costs $16 less on MSRP ($109 MSRP vs $125 MSRP).
✅Delivers 12.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 5.7 vs 5.0 G3D/$ ($109 MSRP vs $125 MSRP).
✅Draws 80W instead of 225W, a 145W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌2015 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GRID K160Q is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 1.9% in PassMark G3D (628 vs 616), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GRID K160Q is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon R7 A360 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $16 cheaper on MSRP at $109 vs $125, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 12.5% (5.7 vs 5.0), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon R7 A360 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, GRID K160Q has the stronger long-term case.

GRID K160Q vs Radeon R7 A360 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GRID K160Q

The GRID K160Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 28 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 745 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 628 points. Launch price was $937.

Radeon R7 A360

The Radeon R7 A360 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 18 2015. It features the GCN 2.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1000 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 80W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 616 points. Launch price was $109.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GRID K160Q scores 628 and the Radeon R7 A360 reaches 616 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GRID K160Q is built on Kepler while the Radeon R7 A360 uses GCN 2.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 1,536 (GRID K160Q) vs 768 (Radeon R7 A360). Raw compute: 2.289 TFLOPS (GRID K160Q) vs 1.613 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 A360).

Feature	GRID K160Q	Radeon R7 A360
G3D Mark Score	628+2%	616
Architecture	Kepler	GCN 2.0
Process Node	28 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	1536+100%	768
Compute (TFLOPS)	2.289 TFLOPS+42%	1.613 TFLOPS
ROPs	32+100%	16
TMUs	128+167%	48
L1 Cache	128 KB	192 KB+50%
L2 Cache	512 KB+100%	256 KB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	GRID K160Q	Radeon R7 A360
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 512 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GRID K160Q and 128-bit on the Radeon R7 A360. L2 Cache: 512 KB (GRID K160Q) vs 256 KB (Radeon R7 A360) — the GRID K160Q has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GRID K160Q	Radeon R7 A360
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	128-bit+100%
L2 Cache	512 KB+100%	256 KB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GRID K160Q draws 225W versus the Radeon R7 A360's 80W — a 95.1% difference. The Radeon R7 A360 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GRID K160Q) vs 350W (Radeon R7 A360). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None.

Feature	GRID K160Q	Radeon R7 A360
TDP	225W	80W-64%
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	None
Perf/Watt	2.8	7.7+175%

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GRID K160Q came in at $125, while the Radeon R7 A360 launched at $109. On MSRP, Radeon R7 A360 was 12.8% cheaper ($16 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 5.0 (GRID K160Q) vs 5.7 (Radeon R7 A360) — the Radeon R7 A360 offers 14% better value. The newer card here is Radeon R7 A360 (2015 vs 2013).

Feature	GRID K160Q	Radeon R7 A360
MSRP	$125	$109-13%
Performance per Dollar	5.0	5.7+14%
Codename	GK104	Tobago
Release	June 28 2013	June 18 2015
Ranking	#589	#576

Search GRID K160Q on Amazon

Search Radeon R7 A360 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.