CPU
GPU
GRID K2
Popular choices:
FirePro W4300
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GRID K2 is positioned at rank 381 and the FirePro W4300 is on rank 168, so the FirePro W4300 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GRID K2
Performance Per Dollar FirePro W4300
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GRID K2 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.7% higher G3D Mark score. However, the FirePro W4300 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | GRID K2 | FirePro W4300 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.7%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.7%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Kepler (2012−2018)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / GCN 2.0 (2013−2017)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The FirePro W4300 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the FirePro W4300 holds the technical lead. Priced at $50 (vs $80), it costs 38% less, resulting in a 58.9% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GRID K2 | FirePro W4300 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+58.9%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($80) | ✅More affordable ($50) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GRID K2 and FirePro W4300
GRID K2
The GRID K2 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 11 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 745 MHz. It has 1536 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,737 points. Launch price was $5,199.
FirePro W4300
The FirePro W4300 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in December 1 2015. It features the GCN 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 930 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,719 points.
Graphics Performance
The GRID K2 scores 2,737 and the FirePro W4300 reaches 2,719 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GRID K2 is built on Kepler while the FirePro W4300 uses GCN 2.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 1,536 (GRID K2) vs 768 (FirePro W4300). Raw compute: 2.289 TFLOPS ×2 (GRID K2) vs 1.428 TFLOPS (FirePro W4300).
| Feature | GRID K2 | FirePro W4300 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 2,737 | 2,719 |
| Architecture | Kepler | GCN 2.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 1536 ×2+100% | 768 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.289 TFLOPS ×2+60% | 1.428 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 32 ×2+100% | 16 |
| TMUs | 128 ×2+167% | 48 |
| L1 Cache | 128 KB | 192 KB+50% |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB+100% | 256 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GRID K2 | FirePro W4300 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GRID K2 comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the FirePro W4300 has 4 GB. The FirePro W4300 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 512 KB (GRID K2) vs 256 KB (FirePro W4300) — the GRID K2 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GRID K2 | FirePro W4300 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 4 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB+100% | 256 KB |
Power & Dimensions
The GRID K2 draws 225W versus the FirePro W4300's 50W — a 127.3% difference. The FirePro W4300 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GRID K2) vs 350W (FirePro W4300). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | GRID K2 | FirePro W4300 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 225W | 50W-78% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | — | 171mm |
| Height | — | 69mm |
| Slots | — | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 71°C |
| Perf/Watt | 12.2 | 54.4+346% |
Value Analysis
The GRID K2 launched at $5199 MSRP and currently averages $80, while the FirePro W4300 launched at $379 and now averages $50. The FirePro W4300 costs 37.5% less ($30 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 34.2 (GRID K2) vs 54.4 (FirePro W4300) — the FirePro W4300 offers 59.1% better value. The FirePro W4300 is the newer GPU (2015 vs 2013).
| Feature | GRID K2 | FirePro W4300 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $5199 | $379-93% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $80 | $50-38% |
| Performance per Dollar | 34.2 | 54.4+59% |
| Codename | GK104 | Bonaire |
| Release | May 11 2013 | December 1 2015 |
| Ranking | #611 | #590 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GRID K2 and FirePro W4300
