GRID K340 vs GRID RTX6000-2Q

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GRID K340 vs GRID RTX6000-2Q FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GRID K340 vs GRID RTX6000-2Q: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GRID K340

2013

Why buy it

✅Costs $3,001 less on MSRP ($3,299 MSRP vs $6,300 MSRP).
✅Delivers 89.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.2 vs 0.1 G3D/$ ($3,299 MSRP vs $6,300 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌2013 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

GRID RTX6000-2Q

2015

Why buy it

✅More future proof: Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌2015 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
91% HIGHER MSRP
$6,300 MSRPvs$3,299 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.1 vs 0.2 G3D/$ ($6,300 MSRP vs $3,299 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GRID RTX6000-2Q is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 0.9% in PassMark G3D (656 vs 650), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GRID K340 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GRID K340 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $3,001 cheaper on MSRP at $3,299 vs $6,300, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 89.2% (0.2 vs 0.1), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. GRID RTX6000-2Q still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

GRID K340 vs GRID RTX6000-2Q Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GRID K340

The GRID K340 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 23 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 950 MHz. It has 384 ×4 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 650 points. Launch price was $3,299.

GRID RTX6000-2Q

The GRID RTX6000-2Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 557 MHz to 1178 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 656 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GRID K340 scores 650 and the GRID RTX6000-2Q reaches 656 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GRID K340 is built on Kepler while the GRID RTX6000-2Q uses Maxwell 2.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 384 (GRID K340) vs 2,048 (GRID RTX6000-2Q). Raw compute: 0.7296 TFLOPS ×4 (GRID K340) vs 4.825 TFLOPS (GRID RTX6000-2Q).

Feature	GRID K340	GRID RTX6000-2Q
G3D Mark Score	650	656
Architecture	Kepler	Maxwell 2.0
Process Node	28 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	384 ×4	2048+433%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.7296 TFLOPS ×4	4.825 TFLOPS+561%
ROPs	8 ×4	64+700%
TMUs	32 ×4	128+300%
L1 Cache	32 KB	768 KB+2300%
L2 Cache	0.13 MB	2 MB+1438%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GRID RTX6000-2Q gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The GRID K340 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GRID K340	GRID RTX6000-2Q
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	NVIDIA Reflex

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 512 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GRID K340 and 64-bit on the GRID RTX6000-2Q. L2 Cache: 0.13 MB (GRID K340) vs 2 MB (GRID RTX6000-2Q) — the GRID RTX6000-2Q has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GRID K340	GRID RTX6000-2Q
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	64-bit
L2 Cache	0.13 MB	2 MB+1438%

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GRID K340 draws 225W versus the GRID RTX6000-2Q's 225W — a 0% difference. The GRID RTX6000-2Q is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GRID K340) vs 350W (GRID RTX6000-2Q). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	GRID K340	GRID RTX6000-2Q
TDP	225W	225W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Perf/Watt	2.9	2.9

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GRID K340 came in at $3299, while the GRID RTX6000-2Q launched at $6300. On MSRP, GRID K340 was 47.6% cheaper ($3001 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 0.2 (GRID K340) vs 0.1 (GRID RTX6000-2Q) — the GRID K340 offers 100% better value. The newer card here is GRID RTX6000-2Q (2015 vs 2013).

Feature	GRID K340	GRID RTX6000-2Q
MSRP	$3299-48%	$6300
Performance per Dollar	0.2+100%	0.1
Codename	GK107	GM204
Release	July 23 2013	August 30 2015
Ranking	#817	#433

Search GRID K340 on Amazon

Search GRID RTX6000-2Q on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.