GRID K340 vs Radeon R5 M430

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GRID K340 vs Radeon R5 M430 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GRID K340 vs Radeon R5 M430: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GRID K340

2013

Why buy it

✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

❌2013 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
3232.3% HIGHER MSRP
$3,299 MSRPvs$99 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.2 vs 6.6 G3D/$ ($3,299 MSRP vs $99 MSRP).
❌200% higher power demand at 225W vs 75W.

Radeon R5 M430

2016

Why buy it

✅Costs $3,200 less on MSRP ($99 MSRP vs $3,299 MSRP).
✅Delivers 3227.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 6.6 vs 0.2 G3D/$ ($99 MSRP vs $3,299 MSRP).
✅Draws 75W instead of 225W, a 150W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌2016 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GRID K340 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 0.2% in PassMark G3D (650 vs 649), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GRID K340 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon R5 M430 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $3,200 cheaper on MSRP at $99 vs $3,299, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 3227.2% (6.6 vs 0.2), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon R5 M430 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, GRID K340 has the stronger long-term case.

GRID K340 vs Radeon R5 M430 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GRID K340

The GRID K340 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 23 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 950 MHz. It has 384 ×4 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 650 points. Launch price was $3,299.

Radeon R5 M430

The Radeon R5 M430 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 15 2016. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 780 MHz to 1030 MHz. It has 320 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 649 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GRID K340 scores 650 and the Radeon R5 M430 reaches 649 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GRID K340 is built on Kepler while the Radeon R5 M430 uses GCN 1.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 384 (GRID K340) vs 320 (Radeon R5 M430). Raw compute: 0.7296 TFLOPS ×4 (GRID K340) vs 0.6592 TFLOPS (Radeon R5 M430).

Feature	GRID K340	Radeon R5 M430
G3D Mark Score	650	649
Architecture	Kepler	GCN 1.0
Process Node	28 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	384 ×4+20%	320
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.7296 TFLOPS ×4+11%	0.6592 TFLOPS
ROPs	8 ×4	8
TMUs	32 ×4+60%	20
L1 Cache	32 KB	80 KB+150%
L2 Cache	128 KB	128 KB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	GRID K340	Radeon R5 M430
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 512 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GRID K340 and 128-bit on the Radeon R5 M430.

Feature	GRID K340	Radeon R5 M430
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	128-bit+100%
L2 Cache	128 KB	128 KB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GRID K340 draws 225W versus the Radeon R5 M430's 75W — a 100% difference. The Radeon R5 M430 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GRID K340) vs 350W (Radeon R5 M430). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Mobile.

Feature	GRID K340	Radeon R5 M430
TDP	225W	75W-67%
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	Mobile
Slots	—	0
Temp (Load)	—	80°C
Perf/Watt	2.9	8.7+200%

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GRID K340 came in at $3299, while the Radeon R5 M430 launched at $99. On MSRP, Radeon R5 M430 was 97% cheaper ($3200 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 0.2 (GRID K340) vs 6.6 (Radeon R5 M430) — the Radeon R5 M430 offers 3200% better value. The newer card here is Radeon R5 M430 (2016 vs 2013).

Feature	GRID K340	Radeon R5 M430
MSRP	$3299	$99-97%
Performance per Dollar	0.2	6.6+3200%
Codename	GK107	Jet
Release	July 23 2013	May 15 2016
Ranking	#817	#922

Search GRID K340 on Amazon

Search Radeon R5 M430 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.