GeForce GT 140 vs GRID K340

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GT 140 vs GRID K340 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GT 140 vs GRID K340: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GT 140

2014

Why buy it

✅Costs $3,200 less on MSRP ($99 MSRP vs $3,299 MSRP).
✅Delivers 3273.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 6.6 vs 0.2 G3D/$ ($99 MSRP vs $3,299 MSRP).
✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (1 GB vs 512 MB).
✅Draws 64W instead of 225W, a 161W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌2014 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

GRID K340

2013

Why buy it

✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 1 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2013 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
3232.3% HIGHER MSRP
$3,299 MSRPvs$99 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.2 vs 6.6 G3D/$ ($3,299 MSRP vs $99 MSRP).
❌251.6% higher power demand at 225W vs 64W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GeForce GT 140 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 1.2% in PassMark G3D (658 vs 650), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce GT 140 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 1 GB vs 512 MB of VRAM and a newer 2014 generation instead of 2013. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce GT 140 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $3,200 cheaper on MSRP at $99 vs $3,299, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 3273.3% (6.6 vs 0.2), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

GeForce GT 140 vs GRID K340 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GT 140

The GeForce GT 140 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 29 2014. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 993 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 64W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 658 points. Launch price was $89.

GRID K340

The GRID K340 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 23 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 950 MHz. It has 384 ×4 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 650 points. Launch price was $3,299.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GT 140 scores 658 and the GRID K340 reaches 650 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GT 140 is built on Kepler while the GRID K340 uses Kepler, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 384 (GeForce GT 140) vs 384 (GRID K340). Raw compute: 0.7626 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 140) vs 0.7296 TFLOPS ×4 (GRID K340).

Feature	GeForce GT 140	GRID K340
G3D Mark Score	658+1%	650
Architecture	Kepler	Kepler
Process Node	28 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	384	384 ×4
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.7626 TFLOPS+5%	0.7296 TFLOPS ×4
ROPs	16+100%	8 ×4
TMUs	32	32 ×4
L1 Cache	32 KB	32 KB
L2 Cache	256 KB+100%	128 KB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GT 140 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The GRID K340 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce GT 140	GRID K340
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GT 140 has 1 GB of VRAM, while the GRID K340 carries 512 MB. GeForce GT 140 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GT 140 and 64-bit on the GRID K340. L2 Cache: 256 KB (GeForce GT 140) vs 128 KB (GRID K340) — the GeForce GT 140 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce GT 140	GRID K340
VRAM Capacity	1 GB+100%	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	128-bit+100%	64-bit
L2 Cache	256 KB+100%	128 KB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GT 140 draws 64W versus the GRID K340's 225W — a 111.4% difference. The GeForce GT 140 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GT 140) vs 350W (GRID K340). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	GeForce GT 140	GRID K340
TDP	64W-72%	225W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	None	PCIe-powered
Length	229mm	—
Height	111mm	—
Slots	1	—
Temp (Load)	85°C	—
Perf/Watt	10.3+255%	2.9

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce GT 140 came in at $99, while the GRID K340 launched at $3299. On MSRP, GeForce GT 140 was 97% cheaper ($3200 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 6.6 (GeForce GT 140) vs 0.2 (GRID K340) — the GeForce GT 140 offers 3200% better value. The newer card here is GeForce GT 140 (2014 vs 2013).

Feature	GeForce GT 140	GRID K340
MSRP	$99-97%	$3299
Performance per Dollar	6.6+3200%	0.2
Codename	GK107	GK107
Release	May 29 2014	July 23 2013
Ranking	#777	#817

Search GeForce GT 140 on Amazon

Search GRID K340 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.