GRID K340 vs Radeon R7 M340

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GRID K340 vs Radeon R7 M340 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GRID K340 vs Radeon R7 M340: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GRID K340

2013

Why buy it

✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

❌2013 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
2649.2% HIGHER MSRP
$3,299 MSRPvs$120 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.2 vs 5.4 G3D/$ ($3,299 MSRP vs $120 MSRP).
❌200% higher power demand at 225W vs 75W.

Radeon R7 M340

2015

Why buy it

✅Costs $3,179 less on MSRP ($120 MSRP vs $3,299 MSRP).
✅Delivers 2632.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 5.4 vs 0.2 G3D/$ ($120 MSRP vs $3,299 MSRP).
✅Draws 75W instead of 225W, a 150W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌2015 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GRID K340 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 0.6% in PassMark G3D (650 vs 646), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GRID K340 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon R7 M340 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $3,179 cheaper on MSRP at $120 vs $3,299, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 2632.2% (5.4 vs 0.2), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon R7 M340 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, GRID K340 has the stronger long-term case.

GRID K340 vs Radeon R7 M340 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GRID K340

The GRID K340 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 23 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 950 MHz. It has 384 ×4 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 650 points. Launch price was $3,299.

Radeon R7 M340

The Radeon R7 M340 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 5 2015. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 900 MHz to 915 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 646 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GRID K340 scores 650 and the Radeon R7 M340 reaches 646 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GRID K340 is built on Kepler while the Radeon R7 M340 uses GCN 1.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 384 (GRID K340) vs 640 (Radeon R7 M340). Raw compute: 0.7296 TFLOPS ×4 (GRID K340) vs 1.171 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 M340).

Feature	GRID K340	Radeon R7 M340
G3D Mark Score	650	646
Architecture	Kepler	GCN 1.0
Process Node	28 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	384 ×4	640+67%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.7296 TFLOPS ×4	1.171 TFLOPS+60%
ROPs	8 ×4	16+100%
TMUs	32 ×4	40+25%
L1 Cache	32 KB	160 KB+400%
L2 Cache	128 KB	256 KB+100%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	GRID K340	Radeon R7 M340
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 512 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GRID K340 and 128-bit on the Radeon R7 M340. L2 Cache: 128 KB (GRID K340) vs 256 KB (Radeon R7 M340) — the Radeon R7 M340 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GRID K340	Radeon R7 M340
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	128-bit+100%
L2 Cache	128 KB	256 KB+100%

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GRID K340 draws 225W versus the Radeon R7 M340's 75W — a 100% difference. The Radeon R7 M340 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GRID K340) vs 350W (Radeon R7 M340). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Mobile.

Feature	GRID K340	Radeon R7 M340
TDP	225W	75W-67%
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	Mobile
Perf/Watt	2.9	8.6+197%

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GRID K340 came in at $3299, while the Radeon R7 M340 launched at $120. On MSRP, Radeon R7 M340 was 96.4% cheaper ($3179 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 0.2 (GRID K340) vs 5.4 (Radeon R7 M340) — the Radeon R7 M340 offers 2600% better value. The newer card here is Radeon R7 M340 (2015 vs 2013).

Feature	GRID K340	Radeon R7 M340
MSRP	$3299	$120-96%
Performance per Dollar	0.2	5.4+2600%
Codename	GK107	Tropo
Release	July 23 2013	May 5 2015
Ranking	#817	#737

Search GRID K340 on Amazon

Search Radeon R7 M340 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.