
GRID M10-0B vs FirePro 3D V4800

GRID M10-0B
Popular choices:

FirePro 3D V4800
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GRID M10-0B is positioned at rank 403 and the FirePro 3D V4800 is on rank 227, so the FirePro 3D V4800 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GRID M10-0B
Performance Per Dollar FirePro 3D V4800
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The GRID M10-0B is significantly newer (2016 vs 2010). The GRID M10-0B likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The FirePro 3D V4800 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GRID M10-0B is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2% higher G3D Mark score. However, the FirePro 3D V4800 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | GRID M10-0B | FirePro 3D V4800 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+2%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / Maxwell (2014−2017)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The FirePro 3D V4800 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the FirePro 3D V4800 holds the technical lead. Priced at $20 (vs $1,000), it costs 98% less, resulting in a 4802.4% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GRID M10-0B | FirePro 3D V4800 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+4802.4%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($1,000) | ✅More affordable ($20) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GRID M10-0B and FirePro 3D V4800

GRID M10-0B
The GRID M10-0B is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2016. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1033 MHz to 1306 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 871 points.

FirePro 3D V4800
The FirePro 3D V4800 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 26 2010. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 690 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 74W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 854 points. Launch price was $479.
Graphics Performance
The GRID M10-0B scores 871 and the FirePro 3D V4800 reaches 854 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GRID M10-0B is built on Maxwell while the FirePro 3D V4800 uses TeraScale 2, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 640 (GRID M10-0B) vs 800 (FirePro 3D V4800). Raw compute: 1.672 TFLOPS (GRID M10-0B) vs 1.104 TFLOPS (FirePro 3D V4800).
| Feature | GRID M10-0B | FirePro 3D V4800 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 871+2% | 854 |
| Architecture | Maxwell | TeraScale 2 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 640 | 800+25% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.672 TFLOPS+51% | 1.104 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 16 | 16 |
| TMUs | 40 | 40 |
| L1 Cache | 320 KB+300% | 80 KB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+700% | 0.25 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GRID M10-0B | FirePro 3D V4800 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GRID M10-0B comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the FirePro 3D V4800 has 1 GB. The FirePro 3D V4800 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GRID M10-0B) vs 0.25 MB (FirePro 3D V4800) — the GRID M10-0B has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GRID M10-0B | FirePro 3D V4800 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 1 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+700% | 0.25 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The GRID M10-0B draws 225W versus the FirePro 3D V4800's 74W — a 101% difference. The FirePro 3D V4800 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GRID M10-0B) vs 350W (FirePro 3D V4800). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | GRID M10-0B | FirePro 3D V4800 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 225W | 74W-67% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | — | 168mm |
| Height | — | 69mm |
| Slots | — | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 3.9 | 11.5+195% |
Value Analysis
The GRID M10-0B launched at $4000 MSRP and currently averages $1000, while the FirePro 3D V4800 launched at $189 and now averages $20. The FirePro 3D V4800 costs 98% less ($980 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 0.9 (GRID M10-0B) vs 42.7 (FirePro 3D V4800) — the FirePro 3D V4800 offers 4644.4% better value. The GRID M10-0B is the newer GPU (2016 vs 2010).
| Feature | GRID M10-0B | FirePro 3D V4800 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $4000 | $189-95% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $1000 | $20-98% |
| Performance per Dollar | 0.9 | 42.7+4644% |
| Codename | GM107 | Juniper |
| Release | May 18 2016 | April 26 2010 |
| Ranking | #622 | #780 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















