
GRID M10-1Q vs FirePro 3D V8800

GRID M10-1Q
Popular choices:

FirePro 3D V8800
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar FirePro 3D V8800
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The FirePro 3D V8800 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.2% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GRID M10-1Q.
| Insight | GRID M10-1Q | FirePro 3D V8800 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.2%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.2%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (267mm) | Standard Size (267mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
The FirePro 3D V8800 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the FirePro 3D V8800 holds the technical lead. Priced at $30 (vs $500), it costs 94% less, resulting in a 1603.7% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GRID M10-1Q | FirePro 3D V8800 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+1603.7%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($500) | ✅More affordable ($30) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GRID M10-1Q and FirePro 3D V8800

GRID M10-1Q
The GRID M10-1Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 557 MHz to 1178 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,385 points.

FirePro 3D V8800
The FirePro 3D V8800 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 26 2010. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 690 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 74W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,438 points. Launch price was $479.
Graphics Performance
The GRID M10-1Q scores 2,385 and the FirePro 3D V8800 reaches 2,438 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GRID M10-1Q is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the FirePro 3D V8800 uses TeraScale 2, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (GRID M10-1Q) vs 800 (FirePro 3D V8800). Raw compute: 4.825 TFLOPS (GRID M10-1Q) vs 1.104 TFLOPS (FirePro 3D V8800).
| Feature | GRID M10-1Q | FirePro 3D V8800 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 2,385 | 2,438+2% |
| Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | TeraScale 2 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 2048+156% | 800 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 4.825 TFLOPS+337% | 1.104 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 64+300% | 16 |
| TMUs | 128+220% | 40 |
| L1 Cache | 768 KB+860% | 80 KB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+700% | 0.25 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GRID M10-1Q | FirePro 3D V8800 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 2 GB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GRID M10-1Q) vs 0.25 MB (FirePro 3D V8800) — the GRID M10-1Q has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GRID M10-1Q | FirePro 3D V8800 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+700% | 0.25 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12_1 (GRID M10-1Q) vs 11.2 (FirePro 3D V8800). Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 4.
| Feature | GRID M10-1Q | FirePro 3D V8800 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12_1+7% | 11.2 |
| Max Displays | 0 | 4 |
Power & Dimensions
The GRID M10-1Q draws 225W versus the FirePro 3D V8800's 74W — a 101% difference. The FirePro 3D V8800 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GRID M10-1Q) vs 350W (FirePro 3D V8800). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 267mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots.
| Feature | GRID M10-1Q | FirePro 3D V8800 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 225W | 74W-67% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 267mm | 267mm |
| Height | — | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 85 |
| Perf/Watt | 10.6 | 32.9+210% |
Value Analysis
The GRID M10-1Q launched at $0 MSRP and currently averages $500, while the FirePro 3D V8800 launched at $1499 and now averages $30. The FirePro 3D V8800 costs 94% less ($470 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 4.8 (GRID M10-1Q) vs 81.3 (FirePro 3D V8800) — the FirePro 3D V8800 offers 1593.8% better value. The GRID M10-1Q is the newer GPU (2015 vs 2010).
| Feature | GRID M10-1Q | FirePro 3D V8800 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0-100% | $1499 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $500 | $30-94% |
| Performance per Dollar | 4.8 | 81.3+1594% |
| Codename | GM204 | Juniper |
| Release | August 30 2015 | April 26 2010 |
| Ranking | #525 | #780 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













