GRID M10-1Q vs GRID M40

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GRID M10-1Q vs GRID M40 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GRID M10-1Q vs GRID M40: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GRID M10-1Q

2015

Why buy it

✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

❌2015 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 2.5 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $1,000 MSRP).
❌350% higher power demand at 225W vs 50W.

GRID M40

2016

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 2.5 vs 0 G3D/$ ($1,000 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅Draws 50W instead of 225W, a 175W reduction.
✅More future proof: Maxwell (2014−2017) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌2016 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GRID M40 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 4.8% in PassMark G3D (2,500 vs 2,385), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GRID M10-1Q is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GRID M40 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, GRID M40 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, GRID M10-1Q has the stronger long-term case.

GRID M10-1Q vs GRID M40 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GRID M10-1Q

The GRID M10-1Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 557 MHz to 1178 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,385 points.

GRID M40

The GRID M40 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2016. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1033 MHz to 1000 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,500 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GRID M10-1Q scores 2,385 and the GRID M40 reaches 2,500 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 4.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GRID M10-1Q is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the GRID M40 uses Maxwell, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 2,048 (GRID M10-1Q) vs 384 (GRID M40). Raw compute: 4.825 TFLOPS (GRID M10-1Q) vs 0.7933 TFLOPS (GRID M40). Boost clocks: 1178 MHz vs 1000 MHz.

Feature	GRID M10-1Q	GRID M40
G3D Mark Score	2,385	2,500+5%
Architecture	Maxwell 2.0	Maxwell
Process Node	28 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	2048+433%	384
Compute (TFLOPS)	4.825 TFLOPS+508%	0.7933 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	1178 MHz+18%	1000 MHz
ROPs	64+300%	16
TMUs	128+300%	32
L1 Cache	768 KB+300%	192 KB
L2 Cache	2 MB	2 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	GRID M10-1Q	GRID M40
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 2 GB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GRID M10-1Q and 64-bit on the GRID M40.

Feature	GRID M10-1Q	GRID M40
VRAM Capacity	2 GB	2 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	64-bit
L2 Cache	2 MB	2 MB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GRID M10-1Q draws 225W versus the GRID M40's 50W — a 127.3% difference. The GRID M40 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GRID M10-1Q) vs 350W (GRID M40). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	GRID M10-1Q	GRID M40
TDP	225W	50W-78%
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Length	267mm	—
Slots	2	—
Perf/Watt	10.6	50.0+372%

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GRID M10-1Q came in at $0, while the GRID M40 launched at $1000. On MSRP, GRID M10-1Q was 100+% cheaper ($1000 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): Infinity (GRID M10-1Q) vs 2.5 (GRID M40) — the GRID M10-1Q offers Infinity% better value. The newer card here is GRID M40 (2016 vs 2015).

Feature	GRID M10-1Q	GRID M40
MSRP	$0-100%	$1000
Performance per Dollar	Infinity	2.5
Codename	GM204	GM107
Release	August 30 2015	May 18 2016
Ranking	#525	#742

Search GRID M10-1Q on Amazon

Search GRID M40 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.