CPU
GPU
GRID M40
Popular choices:
UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The GRID M40 is positioned at rank #265 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GRID M40
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs uses modern memory architecture. The UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GRID M40 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GRID M40 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 4.2% higher G3D Mark score and 100+% more VRAM (2 GB vs 0 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs.
| Insight | GRID M40 | UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+4.2%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-4.2%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / Maxwell (2014−2017)) | Gen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022) (10nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100+%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $20 versus $100 for the GRID M40, it costs 80% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 380% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GRID M40 | UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+380%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($100) | ✅More affordable ($20) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GRID M40 and UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs
GRID M40
The GRID M40 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2016. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1033 MHz to 1000 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,500 points.
UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs
The UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs is manufactured by Intel. It was released in August 15 2020. It features the Gen. 11 Ice Lake architecture. The core clock ranges from 350 MHz to 1450 MHz. It has 48 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 28W. Manufactured using 10 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,400 points.
Graphics Performance
The GRID M40 scores 2,500 and the UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs reaches 2,400 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 4.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GRID M40 is built on Maxwell while the UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs uses Gen. 11 Ice Lake, both on 28 nm vs 10 nm. Shader units: 384 (GRID M40) vs 48 (UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs). Boost clocks: 1000 MHz vs 1450 MHz.
| Feature | GRID M40 | UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 2,500+4% | 2,400 |
| Architecture | Maxwell | Gen. 11 Ice Lake |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 10 nm |
| Shading Units | 384+700% | 48 |
| Boost Clock | 1000 MHz | 1450 MHz+45% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GRID M40 | UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GRID M40 comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs has 0 MB. The GRID M40 offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs System.
| Feature | GRID M40 | UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | Shared System RAM |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | Shared |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | System |
Power & Dimensions
The GRID M40 draws 50W versus the UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs's 28W — a 56.4% difference. The UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GRID M40) vs 1W (UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Integrated.
| Feature | GRID M40 | UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 50W | 28W-44% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 1W-100% |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Integrated |
| Length | — | 0mm |
| Height | — | 0mm |
| Slots | — | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 85 |
| Perf/Watt | 50.0 | 85.7+71% |
Value Analysis
The GRID M40 launched at $1000 MSRP and currently averages $100, while the UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs launched at $0 and now averages $20. The UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs costs 80% less ($80 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 25.0 (GRID M40) vs 120.0 (UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs) — the UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs offers 380% better value. The UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2016).
| Feature | GRID M40 | UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1000 | $0-100% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $100 | $20-80% |
| Performance per Dollar | 25.0 | 120.0+380% |
| Codename | GM107 | Tiger Lake Xe |
| Release | May 18 2016 | August 15 2020 |
| Ranking | #742 | #712 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GRID M40 and UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs
