
GRID M6-1Q

Iris Pro Graphics P580
GRID M6-1Q vs Iris Pro Graphics P580 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GRID M6-1Q vs Iris Pro Graphics P580 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends
GRID M6-1Q vs Iris Pro Graphics P580: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GRID M6-1Q
2015Why buy it
- β 100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs Unknown).
- β Iris Pro Graphics P580 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so GRID M6-1Q is the less risky modern option long term.
Trade-offs
- β2015 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- β900% HIGHER MSRP$1,500 MSRPvs$150 MSRP
- βLower G3D Mark per dollar, at 1.4 vs 13.5 G3D/$ ($1,500 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
- β1400% higher power demand at 225W vs 15W.
Iris Pro Graphics P580
2015Why buy it
- β Costs $1,350 less on MSRP ($150 MSRP vs $1,500 MSRP).
- β Delivers 879.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 13.5 vs 1.4 G3D/$ ($150 MSRP vs $1,500 MSRP).
- β Draws 15W instead of 225W, a 210W reduction.
Trade-offs
- βLess VRAM, with Unknown vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- β2015 hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GRID M6-1Q vs Iris Pro Graphics P580 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GRID M6-1Q
The GRID M6-1Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 557 MHz to 1178 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,069 points.

Iris Pro Graphics P580
The Iris Pro Graphics P580 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in September 1 2015. It features the Generation 9.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 350 MHz to 1050 MHz. It has 576 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 14 nm+ process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,026 points.
Graphics Performance
The GRID M6-1Q scores 2,069 and the Iris Pro Graphics P580 reaches 2,026 in the G3D Mark benchmark β just a 2.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GRID M6-1Q is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the Iris Pro Graphics P580 uses Generation 9.0, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm+. Shader units: 2,048 (GRID M6-1Q) vs 576 (Iris Pro Graphics P580). Raw compute: 4.825 TFLOPS (GRID M6-1Q) vs 1.21 TFLOPS (Iris Pro Graphics P580). Boost clocks: 1178 MHz vs 1050 MHz.
| Feature | GRID M6-1Q | Iris Pro Graphics P580 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 2,069+2% | 2,026 |
| Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | Generation 9.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 14 nm+ |
| Shading Units | 2048+256% | 576 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 4.825 TFLOPS+299% | 1.21 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1178 MHz+12% | 1050 MHz |
| ROPs | 64+611% | 9 |
| TMUs | 128+78% | 72 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GRID M6-1Q | Iris Pro Graphics P580 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GRID M6-1Q has 2 GB of VRAM, while the Iris Pro Graphics P580 carries 0 MB. GRID M6-1Q gives you 100+% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GRID M6-1Q and System on the Iris Pro Graphics P580.
| Feature | GRID M6-1Q | Iris Pro Graphics P580 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | Shared System RAM |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | Shared |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | System |
Power & Dimensions
The GRID M6-1Q draws 225W versus the Iris Pro Graphics P580's 15W β a 175% difference. The Iris Pro Graphics P580 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GRID M6-1Q) vs 1W (Iris Pro Graphics P580). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Integrated.
| Feature | GRID M6-1Q | Iris Pro Graphics P580 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 225W | 15W-93% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 1W-100% |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Integrated |
| Length | 1mm | β |
| Slots | 0 | β |
| Perf/Watt | 9.2 | 135.1+1368% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GRID M6-1Q came in at $1500, while the Iris Pro Graphics P580 launched at $150. On MSRP, Iris Pro Graphics P580 was 90% cheaper ($1350 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 1.4 (GRID M6-1Q) vs 13.5 (Iris Pro Graphics P580) β the Iris Pro Graphics P580 offers 864.3% better value.
| Feature | GRID M6-1Q | Iris Pro Graphics P580 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1500 | $150-90% |
| Performance per Dollar | 1.4 | 13.5+864% |
| Codename | GM204 | Skylake GT4e |
| Release | August 30 2015 | September 1 2015 |
| Ranking | #525 | #678 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














