GRID M6-1Q vs Iris Pro Graphics P580

GRID M6-1Q

2015Core: 557 MHzBoost: 1178 MHz
VS
Intel

Iris Pro Graphics P580

2015Core: 350 MHzBoost: 1050 MHz

GRID M6-1Q vs Iris Pro Graphics P580 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GRID M6-1Q vs Iris Pro Graphics P580: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GRID M6-1Q

2015

Why buy it

  • βœ…100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs Unknown).
  • βœ…Iris Pro Graphics P580 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so GRID M6-1Q is the less risky modern option long term.

Trade-offs

  • ❌2015 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • ❌
    900% HIGHER MSRP
    $1,500 MSRPvs$150 MSRP
  • ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 1.4 vs 13.5 G3D/$ ($1,500 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
  • ❌1400% higher power demand at 225W vs 15W.

Iris Pro Graphics P580

2015

Why buy it

  • βœ…Costs $1,350 less on MSRP ($150 MSRP vs $1,500 MSRP).
  • βœ…Delivers 879.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 13.5 vs 1.4 G3D/$ ($150 MSRP vs $1,500 MSRP).
  • βœ…Draws 15W instead of 225W, a 210W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • ❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • ❌2015 hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
GRID M6-1Q is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 2.1% in PassMark G3D (2,069 vs 2,026), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GRID M6-1Q is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 2 GB vs Unknown of VRAM. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Iris Pro Graphics P580 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $1,350 cheaper on MSRP at $150 vs $1,500, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 879.2% (13.5 vs 1.4), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. If you are mainly targeting 1080p, Iris Pro Graphics P580 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, GRID M6-1Q has the stronger long-term case.

GRID M6-1Q vs Iris Pro Graphics P580 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GRID M6-1Q

The GRID M6-1Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 557 MHz to 1178 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,069 points.

Intel

Iris Pro Graphics P580

The Iris Pro Graphics P580 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in September 1 2015. It features the Generation 9.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 350 MHz to 1050 MHz. It has 576 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 14 nm+ process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,026 points.

⚑

Graphics Performance

The GRID M6-1Q scores 2,069 and the Iris Pro Graphics P580 reaches 2,026 in the G3D Mark benchmark β€” just a 2.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GRID M6-1Q is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the Iris Pro Graphics P580 uses Generation 9.0, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm+. Shader units: 2,048 (GRID M6-1Q) vs 576 (Iris Pro Graphics P580). Raw compute: 4.825 TFLOPS (GRID M6-1Q) vs 1.21 TFLOPS (Iris Pro Graphics P580). Boost clocks: 1178 MHz vs 1050 MHz.

FeatureGRID M6-1QIris Pro Graphics P580
G3D Mark Score
2,069+2%
2,026
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
Generation 9.0
Process Node
28 nm
14 nm+
Shading Units
2048+256%
576
Compute (TFLOPS)
4.825 TFLOPS+299%
1.21 TFLOPS
Boost Clock
1178 MHz+12%
1050 MHz
ROPs
64+611%
9
TMUs
128+78%
72
✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureGRID M6-1QIris Pro Graphics P580
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
Standard
πŸ’Ύ

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GRID M6-1Q has 2 GB of VRAM, while the Iris Pro Graphics P580 carries 0 MB. GRID M6-1Q gives you 100+% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GRID M6-1Q and System on the Iris Pro Graphics P580.

FeatureGRID M6-1QIris Pro Graphics P580
VRAM Capacity
2 GB
Shared System RAM
Memory Type
GDDR5
Shared
Bus Width
64-bit
System
πŸ”Œ

Power & Dimensions

The GRID M6-1Q draws 225W versus the Iris Pro Graphics P580's 15W β€” a 175% difference. The Iris Pro Graphics P580 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GRID M6-1Q) vs 1W (Iris Pro Graphics P580). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Integrated.

FeatureGRID M6-1QIris Pro Graphics P580
TDP
225W
15W-93%
Recommended PSU
350W
1W-100%
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
Integrated
Length
1mm
β€”
Slots
0
β€”
Perf/Watt
9.2
135.1+1368%
πŸ’°

Value Analysis

At launch, the GRID M6-1Q came in at $1500, while the Iris Pro Graphics P580 launched at $150. On MSRP, Iris Pro Graphics P580 was 90% cheaper ($1350 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 1.4 (GRID M6-1Q) vs 13.5 (Iris Pro Graphics P580) β€” the Iris Pro Graphics P580 offers 864.3% better value.

FeatureGRID M6-1QIris Pro Graphics P580
MSRP
$1500
$150-90%
Performance per Dollar
1.4
13.5+864%
Codename
GM204
Skylake GT4e
Release
August 30 2015
September 1 2015
Ranking
#525
#678

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.