
GRID M6-1Q
Popular choices:

Radeon 820M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GRID M6-1Q is positioned at rank 326 and the Radeon 820M is on rank 62, so the Radeon 820M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GRID M6-1Q
Performance Per Dollar Radeon 820M
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon 820M is significantly newer (2024 vs 2015). The Radeon 820M likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GRID M6-1Q lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon 820M is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 3.6% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GRID M6-1Q.
| Insight | GRID M6-1Q | Radeon 820M |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-3.6%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+3.6%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)) | RDNA 3+ (2024) (4nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon 820M offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $25 versus $100 for the GRID M6-1Q, it costs 75% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 314.3% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GRID M6-1Q | Radeon 820M |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+314.3%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($100) | ✅More affordable ($25) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GRID M6-1Q and Radeon 820M

GRID M6-1Q
The GRID M6-1Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 557 MHz to 1178 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,069 points.

Radeon 820M
The Radeon 820M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 2 2024. It features the RDNA 3+ architecture. The boost clock speed is 2900 MHz. It has 128 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,143 points.
Graphics Performance
The GRID M6-1Q scores 2,069 and the Radeon 820M reaches 2,143 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GRID M6-1Q is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the Radeon 820M uses RDNA 3+, both on 28 nm vs 4 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (GRID M6-1Q) vs 128 (Radeon 820M). Boost clocks: 1178 MHz vs 2900 MHz.
| Feature | GRID M6-1Q | Radeon 820M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 2,069 | 2,143+4% |
| Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | RDNA 3+ |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 4 nm |
| Shading Units | 2048+1500% | 128 |
| Boost Clock | 1178 MHz | 2900 MHz+146% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GRID M6-1Q | Radeon 820M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 2 GB of video memory. Bus width: 64-bit vs System.
| Feature | GRID M6-1Q | Radeon 820M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | Shared |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | System |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12_1 (GRID M6-1Q) vs 12 Ultimate (Radeon 820M). Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 4.
| Feature | GRID M6-1Q | Radeon 820M |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12_1 | 12 Ultimate |
| Max Displays | 0 | 4 |
Power & Dimensions
The GRID M6-1Q draws 225W versus the Radeon 820M's 30W — a 152.9% difference. The Radeon 820M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GRID M6-1Q) vs 350W (Radeon 820M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 1mm vs 0mm, occupying 0 vs 0 slots.
| Feature | GRID M6-1Q | Radeon 820M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 225W | 30W-87% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 1mm | 0mm |
| Height | — | 0mm |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 80 |
| Perf/Watt | 9.2 | 71.4+676% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon 820M costs 75% less ($75 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 20.7 (GRID M6-1Q) vs 85.7 (Radeon 820M) — the Radeon 820M offers 314% better value. The Radeon 820M is the newer GPU (2024 vs 2015).
| Feature | GRID M6-1Q | Radeon 820M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1500 | — |
| Avg Price (30d) | $100 | $25-75% |
| Performance per Dollar | 20.7 | 85.7+314% |
| Codename | GM204 | Krackan Point |
| Release | August 30 2015 | June 2 2024 |
| Ranking | #525 | #669 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












