GRID M6-1Q vs Radeon R9 M385

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GRID M6-1Q vs Radeon R9 M385 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GRID M6-1Q vs Radeon R9 M385: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GRID M6-1Q

2015

Why buy it

✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2015 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
400% HIGHER MSRP
$1,500 MSRPvs$300 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 1.4 vs 6.9 G3D/$ ($1,500 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
❌200% higher power demand at 225W vs 75W.

Radeon R9 M385

2015

Why buy it

✅Costs $1,200 less on MSRP ($300 MSRP vs $1,500 MSRP).
✅Delivers 398.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 6.9 vs 1.4 G3D/$ ($300 MSRP vs $1,500 MSRP).
✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
✅Draws 75W instead of 225W, a 150W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌2015 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GRID M6-1Q is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 0.4% in PassMark G3D (2,069 vs 2,061), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GRID M6-1Q is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon R9 M385 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $1,200 cheaper on MSRP at $300 vs $1,500, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 398.1% (6.9 vs 1.4), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon R9 M385 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, GRID M6-1Q has the stronger long-term case.

GRID M6-1Q vs Radeon R9 M385 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GRID M6-1Q

The GRID M6-1Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 557 MHz to 1178 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,069 points.

Radeon R9 M385

The Radeon R9 M385 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 5 2015. It features the GCN 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 900 MHz to 1100 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,061 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GRID M6-1Q scores 2,069 and the Radeon R9 M385 reaches 2,061 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GRID M6-1Q is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the Radeon R9 M385 uses GCN 2.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 2,048 (GRID M6-1Q) vs 896 (Radeon R9 M385). Raw compute: 4.825 TFLOPS (GRID M6-1Q) vs 1.792 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 M385). Boost clocks: 1178 MHz vs 1100 MHz.

Feature	GRID M6-1Q	Radeon R9 M385
G3D Mark Score	2,069	2,061
Architecture	Maxwell 2.0	GCN 2.0
Process Node	28 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	2048+129%	896
Compute (TFLOPS)	4.825 TFLOPS+169%	1.792 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	1178 MHz+7%	1100 MHz
ROPs	64+300%	16
TMUs	128+129%	56
L1 Cache	768 KB+243%	224 KB
L2 Cache	2 MB+700%	0.25 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	GRID M6-1Q	Radeon R9 M385
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GRID M6-1Q has 2 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R9 M385 carries 4 GB. Radeon R9 M385 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GRID M6-1Q and 128-bit on the Radeon R9 M385. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GRID M6-1Q) vs 0.25 MB (Radeon R9 M385) — the GRID M6-1Q has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GRID M6-1Q	Radeon R9 M385
VRAM Capacity	2 GB	4 GB+100%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	128-bit+100%
L2 Cache	2 MB+700%	0.25 MB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GRID M6-1Q draws 225W versus the Radeon R9 M385's 75W — a 100% difference. The Radeon R9 M385 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GRID M6-1Q) vs 350W (Radeon R9 M385). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Mobile.

Feature	GRID M6-1Q	Radeon R9 M385
TDP	225W	75W-67%
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	Mobile
Length	1mm	—
Slots	0	—
Perf/Watt	9.2	27.5+199%

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GRID M6-1Q came in at $1500, while the Radeon R9 M385 launched at $300. On MSRP, Radeon R9 M385 was 80% cheaper ($1200 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 1.4 (GRID M6-1Q) vs 6.9 (Radeon R9 M385) — the Radeon R9 M385 offers 392.9% better value.

Feature	GRID M6-1Q	Radeon R9 M385
MSRP	$1500	$300-80%
Performance per Dollar	1.4	6.9+393%
Codename	GM204	Strato
Release	August 30 2015	May 5 2015
Ranking	#525	#674

Search GRID M6-1Q on Amazon

Search Radeon R9 M385 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.